You are not logged in.
Lo
It will mean killing a lot of people who are determined to kill us, but in the end it will save many more.
Hi Cobra, for one you kill, ten rise against you, such as you have to kill more and more, have hands filled with blood, as a true genocider, and that makes you not much different from those you are killing, that makes you a member fo Empire of Evil.
By the way what are the Values you are fighting for ? Respect of life ?
LO
I'm not judging US army behaviour. I know too much that french troops did commit torture during Algeria liberation war, and that was ordered by highest army command level. A whole class of age conscript soldiers came back to France, wakening at night with the long and desperate screams of tortured guys nightmares.
None of them never talked about Algeria, trying so hard to forget..
Just no reports of laughing soldiers merry with the atrocities they knew they were commiting, when trying to get informations on the coming on next terrorist attacks.
How can you ask me to accept my citizen young fellows to get involved with that again ?
LO
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/04/ … shtml]Your president reacts
LO
Anyone who has the power to make you believe absurdities has the power to make you commit injustices.
Not only injustices, atrocities too !
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/04/ … 3.shtml]US general suspended over abuse
I've changed my mind, I did support European troops sending to Irak,
now I'm too disgusted to think we can have any commitment with these non human sadist torturers
LO
1) go to Google
write : weapons of mass destruction
click "I'm feeling lucky"
2) go to Google
write : miserable failure
click "I'm feeling lucky"
How accurate answers Google gives !
LO
Zero G loving ant fun, it is scary.
No sense of fun, sure they didn'nt have a kinda 3D trempoline surrounding the lovemakers ???
LO
But in Iraq we missed our chance, lessons learned for next time.
There has been a lack of analysis, Saddam didn't hold the power just with Baathists, or there would have been a state of civil war in southern Irak, but he had agreements with some of main shiite clerics.
The point is does the population feel free or occupied, and by now, except for the Kurds, 95 % of Irakis feel occupied, smile at US by day and support mujahidins by night, so that any puppet government will be as hatred as occupiers.
The spectrum of a civil war is mainly a pretext for holding occupation, the goal being to insure having a proUS government letting freehands for oil control.
LO
Having ZeroG sex must be great
LO
I swear I didn't vote for Chirac
LO
Even the Europeans agree the world is safer with Saddam behind bars, and his sons dead.
You're daydreaming, boy, NOT THE SPANISHES ! :angry:
Nor the Brits nor the Poles which expect for terrorist attacks at anytime.
Sorry to say that, but Europeans deal with too low employment rate, extension of Europe and economic help to newcomers, while trying to keep budget balance.
They don't have a dime for Irak, and still have massively antiwar public opinion.
USA, GB and allies will have to deal with Irak whoever is at White House, so Americans have to prepare their minds to a long lasting and bloody occupation that will be much similar to IsraelvPalestine neverending conflict.
White House Says Iraq Sovereignty Could Be Limited
I guess that Irakis will not stand "limited sovereignty" that means US proconsulate for a long time.
LO
Spain apparently will follow NATO or UN led operations but not US operations, such as Iraq.
Pale blue paint for helmets is much cheaper in Europe than in USA
LO
moderate right party reculed, the socialists and other leftists were stable or slightly progressed and the so called far-right party, the equivalent of the american republican party (sorry but that's the truth, you don't like it, but that's the truth, the french FN is just a conservative, republican party, called far-right by leftist media) significantly improved its score.
2nd round of french elections contradicts you, Dickbill
Chirac's party gets severely spanked. Main reason is unexisting employment policy.
Pink socialist party wins in 20 out of 22 french administrative regions' councils,
total of left votes equals right + extreme right parties.
Openly racist FN party deflating.
Froggies keep on being unpredictable, even to themselves :laugh:
LO
I'm thinking to make my own telescope too.
You'd better not even try with a tv tube, that's so thick and heavy,
very difficult to cut, has'nt the right curve, glass cannot be covered with a reflective metal film by electrolyse.
You can find websites where you will have full help to make your own telescope.
Bon courage !
LO
Walking down the Quais de Seine, I saw a novel book, intittled "Les Xipehuz" by J Rosny Ainé, the "War of Fire" author.
I was attracted by the strange tittle. After a short bargain with the bouquinist I bought it 10 €.
What a luck, this 1887 short novel is among the very first books, may be the very first one where ETs confront Humans, old ages humans living very much as the Red Indians. It starts as a clan of humans join their summer pasture territories, see bright luminous shapes flying in the air and think that they must be gods. Ancients of the tribe order to youngsters to go process and present the gods with the best, food, flowers, and jewels the tribe has...then the slaughter starts on...
I shall not tell more, except that it's an amazingly modern and somehow quite poetic story.
US tittle : "Xipehuz and the Death of the Earth" R. Reginald (Editor), Douglas Melville (Editor) ISBN: 0405110200
Publisher: Ayer Company Publishers, Incorporated
I'm to read again "The Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldritch",
I think that Philip K Dick is "le plus grand auteur de ScienceFiction de tous les temps"*
* Translate yourself
LO
Don, so are you suggesting that the US has the right and duty to force a sovereign nation (Israel) to comply with demands against its will? The slope is getting mighty slippery here... Opposition agument getting murky...
Let me change just a detail in this quote to show you how surrealistic it is ???
Don, so are you suggesting that the US has the right and duty to force a sovereign nation (Irak) to comply with demands against its will? The slope is getting mighty slippery here... Opposition agument getting murky...
Indeed ! UNO 242 resolution is still valuable, as a member of UNO, shouldn't USA also make that resolution respected ?
May be your parents didn't suffer german army occupation.
No. My forefathers ended it. We do that sort of thing, when need arises.
Thanks to them, each July 14th, part of US regiments should parade on Champs Elysées as a reminding for those fallen on Normandy beaches.
That was a question to Dickbill
I think that as soon as Bush will be out, french troops should help secure Irakis.
Some would argue we're doing the same work now.
Slight difference, Irak was under irakis' dictature, not ruled by foreigner occupants.
---
Perle is a paranoîac, Paris wants Europe for an equal dialogue with USA, not to confront USA. And full seat for Europe, not the folding seat.
LO
Don Panic, go back and flagellate youserlf more
I'm not flagellating, as a Vietnam born one, I can fiercely attack and defend. Dont you think I'am a flagellating pacifist.
I never said I did like Islam. I've already said that just the way they prostate to pray trends to lead them to prostate before dictators too.
The matter is how USA is seen in islamic world and why some people decide to turn into an human bombs.
Clean hands F15 pilots dropping napalm bombs are never terrorists.
They just perform a job...
I try to see the other's motivations, if you cant do that you should be a very poor chessplayer, and up to see things closer, I've travelled to Israel where I met very nice pacific people as well as curled hair black hated fascists.
May be your parents didn't suffer german army occupation.
If they did, did they liked it ?
LO
And that is the uncomfortable truth we're going to have to come to grips with, terrorism does work, unless one is as committed to victory as completely as the terrorists are. They will be encouraged by the Socialist victory and they will be emboldened. We need to sharpen our defenses and steel our resolve. More is coming.
As long as USA hasn't GIVE ORDER to the Israelis to stop Palestine occupation with the same strength USA and UNO ordered Saddam to leave Koweit, ALL Arabs and Muslim will see USA as the main Islam ennemy, and you can speak a long time about your defense.
Up to muslim eyes, Bush and Sharon can be called "hitlers", YOU ARE THE THREAT.
As long as Europe has not taken economic sanctions at Israel,
we shall be seen as ennemies of the Arabs and of the Muslims.
That is our part of guilt.
Arabs say they offered peace, and as an answer, the Israelis kept on colonisation day after day, stealing more palestinian ground to give it to US and European jews.
That's mainly the reason for 9/11 tragedy.
For each palestinian death, we'll pay the price, for each iraki death, too.
C'mon keep blind let Sharon keep on stealing palestinian territory and prepare for defence !
LO
Political victory for al Qaeda in Spain equals powerful political ammunition for Republicans in America.
Depends on the way people will see it. Might be wet ammunitions.
When Polish President and Italian Prime say that they sent troops because WMDs lie, that's not real good for Bush.
Some point of History :
As US ambassador in Paris was conferring with De Gaulle about Cuba missiles crisis, he wanted to show air survey photographies of missiles, as evidences of the threat,
said president De Gaulle : "c'est inutile, la parole du Président des Etats-Unis me suffit"*
*"Its useless, words of the Predident of United States are enough"
All american citizens should be aware of the difference in the behaviour of a french president with a respected US President and G.W. Bush.
LO
I wonder how much financial support for al Qaeda comes from private parties in Egypt?
There is a traditionnal arab banking and credit letter system so anybody can send money from almost any part of the world to another part, not only from Egypt but from the whole islamic world.
Some of these money transactors are official, some unofficial, all rely on trust, and the fees are much lower than with real banks.
That is a very massive amount of money transactions escaping any control.
Any islamist militant can send money, so that terrorism funding is almost free, at web speed.
LO
Edit. Oh yeah. Part of the problem? Bush tried to fight a two front war. Defeat terror and suppress the Europeans diplomatically. Reshape the UN to strengthen the US position.
Not necessarily bad (open to argument) but two front wars are usually a bad idea.
Now we either empower Europe or suffer major setbacks in the war on terror
Wise. As a froggy, I'm amazed by the french incredible diplomatic influence, showed by UNO delegates applauses at de Villepin's speech.
Keeping France as close (even quite messy) ally and friend strengthens the US position. Bush administration acting to weaken France and push her in a rest of the world alliance v USA have been as mistake as for Stalin asking : "Vatican, how many divisions ?"
Vatican had its revenge on active USSR split off.
Alliance could have been set if USA had assured that France's interests in middle East were to be preserved.
There was an old US British Dutch and French agreement attributing to France "Mesopotamia oil".
With Clinton, the Frenchies had a fairly good opinion at USA, and same each side of Atlantic, Bush and his room strategists destroyed this relationship, and he personally cannot restore it, any kind of trust has gone,
only another US president can. Same for majority of european citizens.
LO
If you or people who think like you were in charge Saddam would still be running Iraq, and Kuwait, terrorists would have killed thousands more Americans after 9-11, and the US would have no respect in the world.
Political fiction isn't an argument. We sent troops for Irak War I, so Koweit was no more occupied by Saddam anyways.
We are aside USA in Afghanistan, and our elite Alpine "hunters" track Bin Laden in the mountains together with US troops.
You think we have more respect for USA because Bush II attacked Irak, "tu te mets le doigt dans l'oeil *" *"You put your finger in your eye". We are just scared when "la bêtise" reigns over Washington,
and this is sure not respect.
You loose any kind of objectivity, as the result of this attack is an enlargement of terrorist threat, it was supposed to shink it.
Or get conquered by Muslims again.
Spain had Reconquista without US troops help, if I remember History.
LO
Hi Cobra Commander
Okay, let's start with the WMD issue. It is a matter of documented historical record that Saddam's regime had these things. It has never once been documented that a stockpile of chemical weapons disappeared into the eigth dimension, so where are they? Just because the damn things are hidden doesn't mean they don't exist.
Unless you want to argue that bin Laden doesn't exist.
This argument is miserable : a question isn't an answer !
Irak has been visited for ten years by disarmament inspectors,
it was overflyed everyday by US and british air force and spy satellites.
When someone accuses, he must bring up evidences to make true his accusations, if he can't, he shuts up until he finds out !
That's the way before any fair Court of Justice.
And if french secret services reported to the french governement that Irak was not a threat, I have more trust on the french secret services which are much more accurate on middle east than US ones, and particularly about Irak, we're facing ME terrorism at home since 1986.
I never argued that bin Laden doesn't exist, 9/11 is a such heavily obvious evidence !
Why Iraq? Because Iraq was the largest military force in the region,
That was true before Irak War I, that was untrue before Irak War II, first war destroyed Irak war machine, UNO sanctions didn't let any possibility to Irak to import war material.
As for the previous statement, I seriously doubt that 80% of the European population opposed the action
He he, of course, pro war proudly demonstrate clandestinely...here
Well, if you call a liberated people a people occupyed by foreign troopers...and gangrened by day to day terrorist attacs and new gang crimilality that didn't exist before the invasion.
If you are sure that at the very moment these troops come back home, Irak will not turn into an ayatollah's islamic dictatorship, as a will of its Shiite majority.
You may be brilliant at wargames, but maps are not territories.
LO
Your last post is typical of the attitude of so many lefties, who will use anything, even the unnecessary death and injury of thousands of innocent people, to further their cause.
That's exactly what 80 % Europeans and rest of the World think about what Bush and his bunch did with the 9/11 tragedy as a reason to attack Irak, inflating US desire for a retaliation and adding lies about WMD, and Saddam's links with Al Qaeda.
Shaun, sorry to tell you, but that's a very ridiculous "righties"' argument.
LO Shaun
I'm aware that we are all targets for terrorists, as islamic fundamentalists based here in Paris suburbs have sent today a message to french government threatening with heavy terrorist action if the veil law wasn't to be removed.
30,000 French and German troops in Iraq would help solve the problem, perhaps better than raising a new division.
France + Germany, have 8.5 millions jobless people... among them more than a quarter million possible soldiers. One more bloody terrorist attack in Europe, and lots could raise, but more than 85% won't lift a finger as long as Bush and Rumsfeld bunch are in command. WMD lie destroyed any kind of trust. So, want some help ? You know how to vote...
But basically, the only way to fight terrorism is to bring welfare state, hopeful people don't blast themselves.
With Bush's weapon programs, there in no room for that point of view.
LO
heh, Rome fell because it stopped being a warmonger...
Totally untrue, or as true as the argument that Irak War II would lower terrorist threat. Go tell that to Spanishes...
Rome felt because the principle "Cedant arma togae*" was no more respected.
Armies' chieves alternately came to Rome with troops to grab power instead of defending the Empire.
*Weapons must be submitted to civilian power