You are not logged in.
We don't need Mars as a stepping stone to the stars?
Sure, and we don't need America as a stepping stone to space. Numbers aren't everything. When humans are established on Mars, we will have a whole new economic and technological driver, with more favorable launch conditions to the asteroid belt and planets beyond. Mars is the ultimate stepping stone to the stars, artificial habitats are the ultimate cop-out.
Yeah, I'm for Mars for exactly those very reasons. Who wants to live in a tube anyway?
I just thought that at least there'd be an alternative if Mars wasn't viable, and considering "when it's steam boat time, you steam", I don't see why you couldn't do both scenarios, at least to some extent?
Wouldn't a transport system of scale economics from Earth to the rest of the Solar System or indeed from Mars to the asteroid field and beyond, require shipyards, starbases, intergravity transit infrastructure, i.o.w habitats principally built from space material and thus moonbases etc?
The power and energy requirements for acceleration to fractions of light speed for interstellar travel, is greater than what the entire world currently consume in a whole year. Don't the magnitudes suggest things like tapping the inexhaustible power of the Sun, that is building what is basically solar power satellites, just like the high frontier crowd say?The world needs the accumulated American research and scientific discoveries as a stepping stone to Mars, I don't see why it needs the United States per se (sorry!). If contrary to expectation, America would not lead this enterprise though, any power that did, would automatically be highly indebted to the legacy which NASA and superior US research has contributed to the world since 1945. A bit like there wouldn't have been a space program to start with without von Braun and his gang of hijacked German rocket scientists, but on a much greater scale.
America most likely to do it.
I understand for the time being this can't be of much help.
Chinese taikonaut successfully comes back.World hails.
Useless.SETI may give something useful.
PLEASE ENLIGHTEN ABOUT MARSHAL SAVAGE.I never heard.
Bill White: That sounds just like NASA and the U.S. in 1960-70. First-time enthusiasm for Space. Their only advantage: They know what works and doesn't work, which puts them only about five years behind, instead of twenty if they had to start from scratch as we did (would have been less if those darned Soviets had let us in on the secret of their intitial successes). Don't you start to feel a slight tingling tug inside you, to catch up with the Russian and now the Chinese flexibility to adapt their launch systems . . . that we never had to begin with?
OMPETITION BROUGHT MOON SUCESS.lET US HOPE A NEW FRONTIER MAY OPEN.
Lords byrons ideas are relevant.I f we have to leave earth where to go?
If life is already there in mars ,all calculations fail.
DOES IT CONTAIN ACTIVITIES WITHIN LUNAR ORBIT AND EXCLUDE MARS?
It may be gold?
Chinese success may accerate thing.We may watch oyt response.
The matter will take sense of national pride and we will go to mars eventually.
Mine Venus' atmosphere for CO2 for Martian terraforming, as well as ammonia and acids. Have constant transit between Mars and Venus to transfer terraforming materials. Build huge electromagnets in space to orbit Venus; these will pull on the planet's core and cause the planet to speed up. Maneuver Mercury into position orbiting Venus, ship CO2 from Venus to its new moon to begin terraforming there, crash ice-rich asteroids or maybe Jovian moons into Venus, and voila...three new worlds for the price of two.
Its so easy!
Regarding Mercury: My single suggestion for making it habitable, on the surface away from the Sun, would be to slow its rotation to match its orbital period. This should be possible since it's nearly that now, with a tendency towards synchronism already in force--it just needs a little help to "lock-in" for our purposes sooner. (The best way to do this is left as a "student exercise.") Domed surface colonies, shielded from the Sun, should then not only be feasible, but practical places to live, work and transport metals and minerals from, returning with tourists via Solar sailing ships galore! employed in continuous Mercury-Earth, Mercury-Venus and Mercury-Mars orbital commerce.
We may think of it seriously.
At the moment, we can't produce much antimatter or store it very well although we theoretically know how to do both. Initially i would imagine that antimatter would be used as an ignition source for fusion or maybe even plasma engines, only once we can properly produce and store large ammounts of the stuff can it be used for propulsion.
For a pure anti-matter powered space craft? If we have something of a reneissance in space travel and fast expansion out into the solar system, you might see governments showing off their new bad-boys in about 100 years.
It is a good idea.
Please tell salient features.
Excellent.It is too backdated.I a in 2100
Cindy may add a post please.
Byron s answer is convincing.
But for tourists wont it be nice?I long to go.
Useful information.Thank you.
So we may rest assured.
Robot is no substitute fo human observation and thought.
gOOD IDEA.bUT CATCHING SO MANY COMETS IS IMPOSSIBLE IN NEAR FUTURE.tECHNOLOGY DOES NOT PERMIT IT.
tHE ONLY ONE OF ITS TYPE.tHERE WILL BE TWO SUNRISES PROBABLY.iT WILL BE NICE TOURING PLACE.