You are not logged in.
I just now got around to reading Zubrin's comments on NASA's plan, posted here
http://www.marssociety.org/news/2005/1001.asp, and I had a couple thoughts.
1) Since there is going to be such a crunch to insure that we launch the CEV soon after the HLV gets the lunar mod into orbit, why not take a little different approach.
The way it is set up now we have to wait for the right conditions to lauch, and the weather at KSC is often erratic and there always seems to be a reason to delay launch. Instead of using the proposed launch system why not use something like Peagusus, where you can get the CEV above the weather and then launch?
2) Why the hell are we still flying the shuttle. I could think of a lot of things I could with $30bil over the next few years.
Grypd, you are asking the right question. Now that we know that we need Artificial Gravity, we need to find out how much. I know there have been discussion on how much G we need to make the transition for Earth to Mars good just on a comfort and adapation standpoint. But the question now is about our Immune system.
Is the human immune system so connected with it's evolution of Earth that it will only function to its fullest on Earth? If so then is it possible to develop a treatment to counter the change in G on Mars?
Or is it as simple as determining at what level of G does the immune system stop working.
http://home.businesswire.com/portal/sit … ewsLang=en
Got this from Google. What is your prediction on success of this technology?
I think it is great that there all these competitions for space developing technologies. Good things will come of these.
http://www.scienceblog.com/cms/microgra … genes_9069
This is a link to a blog talking about microgravity and our decreased immune system.
Even more of a reason to find a way to generate artificial G for a Mars mission.
I agree that it is not the difficulty of the job or the situation that make people lose their sanity, it is their perception of their situation. Hopefully the people that are going to Mars will percieve their situation as a positive one and will not have difficulties in that area. However, where I see the difficulties arising is in the interpersonal relations of the crew, missing home and loved ones, conflict between the crew, dealing with stress issues, that sort of thing.
But like Cobra pointed out, it is all about job security. I want to see the mental health professional as "mission critical" because that is my speciality, so I have some bias in the matter.
It is not the tough conditions that will generally cause insanity, it the isolation and total contrast to what we are used to, the distance, the lack of any familiarity. These are the factors that many psychologist feel will cause mental conditions on Mars, but hey no one knows how any bosy will handle it. I am sure quiet a few of the early explores went crazy to some degree, maybe even committed sucide, we don't know their stories. You never know how any one person will respond to trauma. I live in Oklahoma City and saw 1st hand the different effects the Federal Building Bombing had on different survivors. Uprooting yourself and moving to a different world in itself can be traumatic on some level. Then add in all the possible things that could go wrong. You will have to have psychiatrists on the first mission, or at least some one with a lot of skill in that field, because mental conditions or some sort are sure to develop, even if it is just interpersonal issues.
I can't imagine being crammed into a tin can for 4-6 months with the people I work with, without going a bit crazy, or homicidal.... LOL
Evilcitizen, you are correct. and with the distance there will be little any one on Earth can do. Besides by time you see political, social, and cultural changes on Mars there will definitely be some changes on Earth, though at a much slower rate. Like any kind of evolution, social evolution is slow and is only changed rapidly and dramatically in the event of major events, Natural disasters (NEO strike), great discoveries (SETI), etc...
Dook, I agree with you more than I would like too. The dreamer in me would like to see these things happen on a compressed time scale, but the realist in me knows it will not be in my lifetime, (barring human longevity increases greatly) before we get to a viable colonization point on Mars.
If we could some how convince NASA to scrap all the crap that is holding us back, but bureaucrats rule and so we wait.
Point taken, thanks for the feedback.
Do you envision the current plan as being successful, despite the problems that the critics are pointing out?
http://www.space.com/businesstechnology … tails.html
I was reading this site article when it came to me. WTF. Why are we even attempting this, because there isn't a better way??? Instead of using all this shuttle tech that is going to have to be completely overhauled, and according to the critics in the aforementioned article, may not work right anyway.
If this the model that NASA wants to use, "Apollo on 'roids", fine, whatever. but why doesn't NASA dump some $$$ into SpaceX and shoot for using the Falcon 9 or whatever number they would be up to that would have the lifting capacity?
[/url]
So GCNRevenger, are you saying this 2nd method would achieve a high enough velocity to make the application worth while, or would a more conventional propulsion approach be better and just throw out the Kinetic approach and the Ion tug cycler.
And then would using a tether to jettison just cargo containers be more cost efficeint, when you are not concerned about time? Probably the wrong thread for this discussion, sorry.
Just for clarification. I was not saying that the $20mil John Allen shelled out will get anyone to Mars. What I was inferring was, there are a lot of rich mother F--kers out there in this world, if they chose to go combine their resources, and bring in others with the plans and desires to go to Mars, for whatever purpose, they could do it. And they could do it a lot sooner than any nation could.
If Dook wants to wait until Mars is a mini-Earth then fine, he has a good point, even those of us that think we want to go to that barren planet right now, for whatever our reasons, I doubt many of us would be able to or willing to stay. To go to Mars while Mars is Mars is going to require a profound love for what the planet is, and a desire to be a trailblazer, to be able to detach from all material and emotional posessions and begin life anew.
That is a breed of humanity that seems very rare indeed in this day and age.
Marsman, if you had Bill Gate's money, would you do everything in your power to get yourself to Mars?
Is that the question you are asking? I know I would. Like Paul Allen footing the tab for SpaceShipOne, if I had that kind of money I would be looking at partnering up with Musk, Bigelow, Branson, whoever it took to get the resourses together to get hunanity, especially me, off this rock.
What kind of velocity/speed would a tether be capable of?
BTW: Thanks for all the feedback everyone.
Cool, that what I was thinking. Would this not be a fairly inexpensive way of doing this, especially if there was a Space Elevator lifting the cargo into LEO. The Ion engines should burn for a longitme and be easily serviceable with same approach you would use for getting the cargo to the cycler
What I meant was. To have the tether in LEO and as the cycler approached on its return to Mars fling the playload on an intercept course with the cycler. ????
Would a Space Tether create enough velocity to zip a payload to the cycler tugs?
Just a question to show off my ignorance.
Would it be possible/feasible to build a couple of Ion driven tugs that would travel between Earth and Mars. I believe I heard at some point that the longer you "burn" an Ion engine in space the faster it will go, up to some point. If so, then if you were to launch a couple Ion tug boats to circle Mars-Earth and use the zip around each body's gravity to help propel them you would get some craft blazing circles around the inner solar system.
Now with those blazing tugs you fling cargo vessels or manned vessels at them to be capture as they approach Earth and have the tugs zip on to Mars where the craft would jettison into orbit. I know my science is weak here, but it sounds cool. What do all you brilliant people think of that?
Go ahead and laugh if needed, I have a strong ego.
Work to develop your science and engineering expertise and piloting skills; those seem to be the criteria for selection.
The great thing about the prospects of settling another celestial body, moon, mars, asteriods, is that not only will they need engieneers, scientists and pilots, and the typical "astronuat" fields but they will need horticulturist, therapist, teachers, farmers, mechanics and many other fields.
What I would do is determine what it is you want to do, and figure out how that field is going to be needed in the exploration of space and then devote resourses in to being the best in your particular field and show how you can benefit the mission by being part of it. Sell your self. So when they are looking for the lucky the few you will the opportunity I am affraid I will never get.
I do not think race, creed, religion or any of those medevil ideas will hamper anyone who does not let it hamper themselves.
At first I felt that the first colonies on Mars would be nearly wholy scientific, becasue it would be scientist that would be going up there, because the nations fronting the cost of the mission in the first place are doing so in a scientific interest. Therefore the political nature of the colony would be based loosely upon whatever countries the scientist came from. But scientist really do not care about real politics, they just politic to gat money to do what they want.
Therefore, the first colonies should not really have any one politcal stance, nor a reason to have one, they are just doing science.
However, with the advent of companies like 4Frontiers with a doable plan of how to colonize from a capitialistic/resourse based veiwpoint, my thoughts on this are begining to change.
We may or may not have a group a national scientists settling the red planet first. It may be intrepid explores prospecting for their cooperation. If that is the case then the colony will not be based on the polictal structure of the Terran nations the people came from but from the mindset of the capitalistic cooperation, which would not be good. Capitalism without Democracy would run wild and I forsee a war in this.
What I would hope would happen is that those going to Mars are doing so because they do not like what has been happening on Earth for millenia and want to start over, but this I fear is a pipe dream infused from reading the Mars Triology too many times. LOL.
The LiftPort Group, as sited above, is doing a lot to bring the Space Elevator to reality.
If you combine the lifting potential and effeciency of the SE with system like a rail gun or a tether you could potentially launch 100s of tons of cargo to Luna or Mars for a fraction of the cost of rocket propulsion.
Just fling your cargo containers in the direction you want them to go, add some small rockets for directional control and orbital insertion (Mars missions) and wa la all the stuff you need is ready and waiting when you get there.
They sound like a good idea, but a even more practical one that will probably be technologically feasible by time we are on Mars is to have bionic space suits. I remember reading about someone who is designing nanites that are embedded into the matierial making it like muscle fibers giving the wearer added strength and enduance. DARPA is looking at it for the Future Warrior and NASA is for spacesuits and Lunar/Martian walker suits.
I admit I am a complete lay person here. So offer a question with a suggestion. If instead of pulling the crew quarters directly behind and in line of the thrust and radiation, or in some triangulation of engines that jeopardizes thrust, what about building the crew quarters as donut and pull it behind one engine, allowing the thrust to go through the whole in the middle.??
my question is, would the radiation be dispersed in a jet like the thrust or would it disperse more freely, thus defeating my idea?
Another good reason for the donut is you can spin it nicely to induce artificial-G for the long trips.
Or am I just talking out of my butt?
Hey people, not that I have not been enjoying the Mercury debate, but, forgive me if I am overstepping my bounds, isn't this supposed to be a post about 4Frontiers.
Okay now that I have said that. I wish the best to this company and I applaud their courage and motivation. The sooner we get to mars and the more people we have trying to get us there the better.
I feel that if other companies with even bigger ambitions, like LiftPort Inc. are showing small success towards a much larger goal, then start ups like 4Frontiers may have some luck. Even if they fail someone will learn from that and start anew.
Hey people, not that I have not been enjoying the Mercury debate, but, forgive me if I am overstepping my bounds, isn't this supposed to be a post about 4Frontiers.
Okay now that I have said that. I wish the best to this company and I applaud their courage and motivation. The sooner we get to mars and the more people we have trying to get us there the better.
I feel that if other companies with even bigger ambitions, like LiftPort Inc. are showing small success towards a much larger goal, then start ups like 4Frontiers may have some luck. Even if they fail someone will learn from that and start anew.