New Mars Forums

Official discussion forum of The Mars Society and MarsNews.com

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Announcement: As a reader of NewMars forum, we have opportunities for you to assist with technical discussions in several initiatives underway. NewMars needs volunteers with appropriate education, skills, talent, motivation and generosity of spirit as a highly valued member. Write to newmarsmember * gmail.com to tell us about your ability's to help contribute to NewMars and become a registered member.

#1 Re: Human missions » nasa technology transfer program » 2016-03-28 23:41:07

The claim for exclusivity is most likely more of a red herring that business people use to fleece the more engineering minded.

I have known a number of engineers in my life who I find hugely frustrating. I consider them the guys who know all the answers but don't know the right questions to ask. I would propose ideas and would repeatedly be met with, "yeah, someone is probably already working on that."

I couldn't make them understand. How many brands of automatic drip coffee makers are there? How many brands of automobiles? It is the engineer who says, "someone is already doing that" and the business minded who say "I need to get my piece of the pie!"

Battery operated power tools were developed for the space program. They sold the tech. So that would make it "exclusive"? Yet, how many brands of cordless tools are there? I know of at least four off the top of my head. So how does that concept of "exclusive" have any real value. Anything that is engineered, can most likely be reverse engineered. Changes can be made to avoid patent infringement.

But overall I think the concept is merely a negotiation tactic. Just my opinion.

#2 Re: Human missions » nasa technology transfer program » 2016-03-28 13:18:44

SpaceNut wrote:

Ya no funds or just barely any flow is not much better....

But the technology is not free and is sold by Nasa...

Lots of web site links.... for nasa technology transfer program....

Perhaps "sold" should be replaced with "licensed" for a better long term return on investment.

#3 Re: Life support systems » 3D Printers » 2016-03-25 22:03:39

Well, the reservations I had sprung from reading that the 3D printed glass will work at 1000 degrees C. The idea of silica fused glass seemed exciting because silica is apparently abundant on Mars. However, the additive that brings the melting point down to 1000 degrees from 2000 degrees , I believe I read was sodium-bicarbonate, does not appear to be abundant...or even present from what have read so far. Bicarbonates in general are on the rare side.

Anyway, the higher temp of the silica fused glass indicates that it wouldn't be a candidate for printing. The print heads would be subject to the higher temps and dips would lead to clogging.

Aside from this, printing a window seems wildly impractical. Perhaps a something along the line of like a deco-block? Something that allows light but offers privacy could be a potential product. And if combined with a CNC removal process, to provide smooth finishes, more common items or lab glass.

But for large scale "flat glass" like a window it may be better to stick to more traditional methods.

#4 Re: Life support systems » 3D Printers » 2016-03-24 21:54:06

Excited about this article, but still with reservations. 3D printing transparent glass.

https://www.technologyreview.com/s/5409 … s-barrier/

#5 Re: Life support systems » Booze » 2016-03-23 17:55:43

Doesn't have to be a "breathalyzer" either. security hand scanner could check identity and alcohol levels. Mobile-friendly - Jun 7, 2015 - New Car Alcohol Sensors Test Breath, Blood To Stop Drunk Drivers ... Meanwhile, the touch-based system detects a person's blood alcohol level by using infrared tissue scanners.

#6 Re: Not So Free Chat » Politics » 2016-03-23 14:07:30

Okay, my view is probably not all that popular but here it is.

Republicans tend to go to war and funnel money to the military industrial complex. They went from having a surplus under Clinton to trying to loot Social Security to fund the Gulf War. The Republican party is largely for people who earn a great deal of money, not Middle Class (and Mitt Romney and Obama agreed "Middle Class" BEGINS at $250,000 a year....I have no idea if that is starting from the bottom going up or top going down) There are a large portion of people who vote against their best financial interests because the Republicans represent their religious views (largely Christian conservatives.)

Democrats funnel money into the health care industry the way Republicans funnel it into the military. Big Pharma uses the govt. as a subsidy to offer lower priced drugs over seas and "remain competitive". This is basically done through Medicare as the majority of people using drugs are seniors. However, Democrats represent the economic interests of the poor by increasing the taxes of the wealthy and redistributing it to the poor as public services.

Democrats get bashed for taxing and placing burdens on business. This is especially harmful to small business and can cause them to fail. "They are punishing the 'job creators'." And for the small business this is absolutely true. But for mega-corp, who out sources their jobs to India, China, Philippines, etc.. The extra taxes are a nuisance that bite into the quarterly bonus of their management, so they like to push the publicity of the small business damaged by taxation.

Also, I do believe in higher taxation for the wealthy. If you have more stuff you want to protect but you don't ever have to send any of your kids into war to protect it...you better be writing checks like there is no tomorrow and be happy that you can spare their lives by doing so.

In the end politics should be about voting in your own best interest whatever that may be.

Anyway, like I said, probably not the most popular view, but that's it.

#7 Re: Life support systems » 3D Printers » 2016-03-22 23:24:17

Sorry, I often get off on tangents.

It is difficult for me to separate what the goal object is from the materials and tools.

3D printers can make a variety of items from a variety of materials and the potential is very exciting. Permanent items, biodegradable items, tools, parts, or whole structures, but it all hinges on materials, need, and conditions will vary as well.

#8 Re: Life support systems » Booze » 2016-03-22 09:26:04

So, in the Martian economy, based on supply and demand economics, beer would be the drink of the elite. At least until a 12 year Martian scotch comes into being. wink

#9 Re: Life support systems » 3D Printers » 2016-03-21 23:13:59

SpaceNut wrote:

Thanks for the links they are interesting but there is not much given in the way of how large the system is or of the mass that it would be to send to mars even if its sent in pieces.
The other is that it appears to be a wet type that fast drys which would be a problem for mars with the low quantity of water and colder temperatures that would effect the concrete / cement setup....
The cement so far proposed is a sulfur base mixture but that is one that is not going to be odor free....

Okay, scale is a variable.

But how about this as a theoretical?

Say you have bots that are able to harvest the iron from the surface and a bot that can use that with a laser for 3D printing truss work?
Truss is not particularly tall, but rather you have say an 18" height and width but a run of 20'? Then stand up the pieces and lash them together with cables (or other printed pieces) and you have made yourself a gantry to move the business end of the printer about.
Now this gantry could also in theory be wrapped in a plastic perhaps much like you tent a house for fumigation.

And even a noxious odor cement...would the odor travel towards the higher pressurized interior or gravitate to the exterior?
Can that structure be coated with an interior sealant? Plastic sheeting? The sheeting works with it in a symbiotic relationship like rebar works with cement. Rebar makes cement stronger. Cement protects rebar from oxidation. Similarly, cement could protect plastic from exterior elements, sandstorms and radiation, while the plastic would protect the cement from interior humidity and keeps the noxious fumes out.

There is also the recent article about CO2 based cement. However I don't know the science.

Truthfully, I don't nuthin' 'bout nuthin'.

But I have a fair track record among friends of looking at existing tech and forecasting what is to come, an amateur futurist if you will.

I don't know the first thing about chemistry, but it seems that most of what I have ever heard/read is that the majority of functions will require air, water, or heat/energy to garner a chemical reaction to convert what is available to what we need (or at least what we currently know we need) on Mars.

I really believe in the necessity to have a bot that can refine and print the iron present on Mars. It will be THE FUNDAMENTAL material to build structures, but also to create tanks that can store oxygen, water, possibly nitrogen. It makes much more sense to have stockpiles of necessities on hand rather than have to rely on making things AFTER humans arrive.

#10 Re: Life support systems » 3D Printers » 2016-03-21 01:02:04

SpaceNut wrote:

Thanks for the utube video's are there actual links to the companies and or written process documents?
I noticed many other video's on the pages as the relate but many had very negative comments to them...

The 3 D printing Idea is something to consider once we can process mars to use it in the printers....

Well, the "Spider" video was done not by a company but as part of a university challenge. The cement printing, I didn't find that particular company but here is a link to another company.
http://www.totalkustom.com/

Companies that do the styrofoam formed cement construction,
http://www.quadlock.com/
http://reddiform.com/
http://www.smartblock.com/

The Hoberman sphere and B.Fuller domes have been around for...what 50 years? Both genius BTW. Those are the kinds of things most of the rest of us can only aspire to.

#11 Re: Life support systems » 3D Printers » 2016-03-21 00:51:02

louis wrote:

Well all things degrade over time - indeed the degrading of plastics in our oceans is a serious issue. I think bioplastics would be useful on Mars in the early colony particularly with respect to producing things such as grow-bags for plants, food processing and parts for various kitchen and farm utensils. 

This link suggests durable bioplastics are feasible:
 
http://sciencelearn.org.nz/Innovation/I … ioplastics


Some items you would want to be durable, others you may want to have break down.

Interesting stuff with filaments made from organic sources like hemp and algae

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-gjJRsLDP0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zFbkKYtIKPY

Conversely, some things you want to be very durable. Like this jet engine.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRQB1SY4d6U

#12 Re: Human missions » Mars City - Your vision? » 2016-03-20 13:49:39

Tom Kalbfus wrote:
Terraformer wrote:

Have I given my vision yet, for Canyon City?

10-20 storey buildings built along the walls of the canyon, a clear roof that uses water for radiation protection, and open space on the canyon floor. Probably an artificial canyon, maybe built by digging down to the floor of a frozen sea.

http://www.blastr.com/sites/blastr/file … k=RcHV39nk
Something like this maybe?

This is pretty cool looking.

It splits the difference between the dome and subterranean ideas. Canyon walls can provide some protection from storms and could even extend out into subterranean extensions. Compartmentalized (most likely.)

It is a nice example of things that don't have to be either/or.

#13 Re: Human missions » Mars City - Your vision? » 2016-03-20 13:34:40

SpaceNut wrote:

Dexter2999 the image on the right could be a hill side construction using the very hill side to mine the insitu resource to actually make the glass, steel and mars cement needed to create it but until we can land the equipment it will have to wait untill raw man power can perform the tasks of construction and building of such structures.

Oh, I am sure that any "artistic" structure will require humans there.

But robots are capable of a whole lot. I think our perspective is more the limit. And that perspective will most likely have to change.

We can't build everything here and carry it with us. It just isn't practical. So, drones will be needed to find and stockpile resource materials. Iron, certainly, but why not have them also creating stores of oxygen, nitrogen, and water?

Speaking of practical, how many engineers and architects are actual builders? Large scale projects currently require large scale workforces to construct. Traditional methods just don't seem to make sense.

New methods are needed. New ideas. Or at least new application of existing ideas. Here are some video links to some interesting tech.

Ten houses printed in 24 hours in China
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SObzNdyRTBs

Spider like 3D printing
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNg8HtcDUF8

This one is using styrofoam as forms for concrete construction
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p3v6VgiM5hY

Expandable structure Hoberman sphere at LSC
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IN5AgauUpPA

Or modular construction inspired by Buckminster Fuller
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Bn2o-xyS6M

Remember this? XANADU (now torn down)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=36lNS1ruK4s

EDIT: I just think we can and need to take a look at existing ideas and see if can't extrapolate them into something more advantageous.

#14 Re: Human missions » Mars City - Your vision? » 2016-03-19 22:05:13

Domes small and large, compartmentalized, redundant systems. Subsurface facilities are also a must. I'm thinking those lava tubes need to be used to house inflatable structures that get reinforced.

To the comment earlier in the thread "adversity breeds camaraderie", I think that only applies to perceived peers. Any elitist would more than likely default to a sense of entitlement and competition for resources kicks in. This is probably not a consideration for a NASA mission in which crew is screened and groomed, but in reference to Elon Musk's idea of tourism this is almost guaranteed to be a given.

Saw this pic today....this looks like it should be on Mars. (Valencia Science Center, Spain)
City-of-Arts-and-Sciences-Valencia.jpg

#16 Re: Not So Free Chat » New free chat issue - Opinions? » 2016-03-18 17:26:49

I dislike the legal maneuvering behind modified seeds/crops. Pushing these on the farmers of Iraq is as ugly as predatory lending practices of the World Bank who seize water rights in underdeveloped countries.

And the logic eludes me in the proposition that if modified crops pollinate a neighboring crop of non-modified crops, the owner of said non-modified crops is subject to legal action. WTF? If you do something on your property that goes airborne and contaminates my crops/property YOU should be the one libel for damages. (By my way of thinking anyway.)

#17 Re: Mars Analogue Research Stations » Fire Ends Mock Mars Mission in Utah Desert » 2016-03-17 23:31:18

Do they crowdsource for funds for this kind of stuff at all?

#18 Re: Life support systems » Booze » 2016-03-17 17:59:16

While beer is wildly popular, I think wine, cider, and perhaps vodka of rice or potatoes might be a better yield of crops and diversity of use.

And we might yet want to revisit mead as bees could be useful for honey and crop pollination purposes.

#19 Re: Life support systems » bamboo » 2016-03-17 16:05:36

Bamboo is certainly useful. Care should be taken in that bamboo can be somewhat invasive in its growth.

I think hemp would be a no-brainer as well.
http://www.hempbasics.com/shop/hemp-information

#20 Re: Life support systems » Use of caves-discussion » 2016-03-17 15:01:11

I'm all about the cave or lava tube usage idea.

I see where the maps of the lava tubes cite collapse points, so reinforcement is probably prudent. I've been obsessed with this idea of using the lava tube as an exo-structure and the assembling an interior  structure of a somewhat smaller scale that is pressurized and then fill the void between the two structures with a reinforcement matrix and an aerated concrete.

I read an article online about an experiment to produce concrete from CO2.
http://phys.org/news/2016-03-carbon-dio … .html#nRlv

Soil providing protection of sandstorms, radiation, etc... all great. I am relatively new to all of this. Has there been any data on the average temp of Mars sub-surface? Like the earth homes maintain a 70 degree temp easily by raising the earths 50 avg temp (below the frost line from what I gather).

And if there are lava tubes, what is the prognosis on using thermal energy sources?

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB