** this ** topic is about harvesting water from comets.
As you (Mars_B4_Moon) are searching the Internet, please watch for items that would stimulate Calliban (and others) to equally interesting posts that focus on the singular challenge of matching orbits with comets and harvesting water for delivery to various Solar System destinations based upon customer requirements.
It is NOT coincidental that this topic is closely associated with another topic on harvesting water from moving air masses for delivery to customers on land.
We are ** starting ** to see some progress as the value of that idea begins to take hold.
Comet harvesting is in the same league... hard to do but ** very ** rewarding.
(th)
]]>Whereas the colonisation of America gave the colonists new fertile land, timber, meat and furs, all free from the overcrowding and limited opportunities of Europe, nothing like that exists on Mars. We know it will be very difficult to survive. The soil is not fertile, it is toxic. The air is not breathable. Water is frozen as hard as stone. There are places a lot more hospitable than that on Earth where very few people live. Think Siberia, Greenland, Antarctica. All of them far more habitable than Mars. And yet these places are not seeing a colonisation rush. It is sensible to ask what it is that Mars has that these places do not have? Why would we expect people to rush to a place that is so thoroughly inhospitable?
]]>Might go in a Space mining or Oceans Colonized Topic
The Many Failures and Few Successes of Zany Iceberg Towing Schemes,
https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/ … es/243364/
not economically feasible they say, even towing from Antarctica to South Australia.
ESA worked on a closed-loop system called Melissa that would recycle all the resources the crew would need to survive on Mars: food, water and oxygen.
Doomer party pooper articles
Humans won’t colonise Mars because it’s too hard and no fun, says Professor Brian Cox
https://inews.co.uk/news/science/humans … ox-1683766
Elon Musk’s Plan to Send a Million Colonists to Mars by 2050 Is Pure Delusion
https://gizmodo.com/elon-musk-mars-colo … 1848839584
older newmars discussion
Colonizing / terraforming small asteroids
https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.php?id=9110
Comet Neowise is reported to be on the order of 3 miles in diameter (nearly 5 kilometers).
I think it is a shame that humans are currently unable to send a probe to this object, let alone to collect material for a variety of purposes.
I looked for an online resource that would show the object's path through the Solar System, but the closest I came was the SkyLive site, which shows the comet against a background of stars.
(th)
]]>The object is releasing material like a comet, but it appears to have been captured.
This suggests it still may be around when NASA's planned probe gets there:
https://gizmodo.com/freaky-active-objec … 1843587415
Excitingly, NASA will be launching a probe to visit the Trojan asteroids. Called Lucy, the spacecraft will investigate a half-dozen Trojans between 2027 and 2033. This mission will shed new light on these mysterious objects, including their chemical composition and how they found themselves within Jupiter’s orbital path.
I'm not sure about the energy economics, but at least there appears to be a prospect that substantial amounts of water may be available in Jupiter's orbit.
This topic was created to think about harvesting water and other useful materials from comets that fly close to Mars, but it might be easier to go collect materials from a sitting duck.
(th)
]]>https://www.space.com/bright-comet-atla … -2020.html
This article, by By Joe Rao 24 days ago, includes an ephemeris for those who might be able to plan ahead for a possible viewing.
The comet is thought to have been around the Sun before (old) but (perhaps) consist of a part of the first trip package, and therefore "new" in terms of behavior with respect to the exposure of volatiles.
While we are some years away from being able to mount expeditions to harvest such travelling repositories of potential wealth, we can certainly foresee that at some point at least one expedition will set out to intercept the comet and redirect the most valuable materials for use where needed.
That time won't be too different from the present, when expeditions still head out into the (now well-charted) oceans to collect fish for sale on shore.
(th)
]]>Thank you for this interesting addition to the scope of the topic. In pursuing your idea, I found a web site I'd not seen before. The lead author of the site appears to have been making a significant effort to collect useful information about Delta-v between various solar system objects (and a great deal more).
http://www.projectrho.com/public_html/r … ntable.php
Ganymede shows up in a table called "Delta-v and Travel Time for ROUND Trips To or From Terra's Surface"
The author introduces a term I have not seen before, for ion drive (type) engines: "Brachistochrone"
About 1/3rd of the way down the page, the author shows a table that is more helpful for the Ganymede proposal.
This table is entitied "Solar system", and it includes a set of planets and objects along X and Y axis. Jupiter (with respect to Mars) shows 25,265 Delta-v and an estimated flight time of 2 years and 3 months (rounded up). The author reminds the reader that the software used is not "NASA grade".
Never-the-less, if you are serious about planning to harvest useful materials from Ganymede, I'd like to encourage you to create a topic in the Interplanetary Transportation Index topic, and begin to develop the details of how that would be done.
You will (I hope) be thinking about creating a business with Ganymede and Mars as the first leg of a trade pattern.
You will have an opportunity to report (in the context of the NewMars forum) your discoveries about the various obstacles to be overcome in setting up your business.
I'd like this topic to focus closely to the idea of working with comets.
Unlike your sensible and practical idea to harvest materials from Ganymede, a comet harvest strategy is dependent upon random events offered by the Universe. The potential advantage of a comet harvesting strategy is that the source of materials can be expected to come close to the intended end user upon occasion. A proof of concept is the 2014 fly-by of a decent sized comet by Mars.
Thank you again for your contribution to this topic!
Best wishes for success with your new Ganymede topic!
It should be fun for you to develop, and you can be assured of at least ((one)) interested follower.
(th)
]]>It has no atmosphere, so they can put the ice on route easily with a cannon or a enormous rail-gun. With some small rocket "attached" (could use gravity drag, so no need to this attach to be spend in the collision), a multi ton rock with minor corrections could be easily targeted to Mars.
Launch as much as need... There is more than enough volatiles on that moons.
]]>So here is the initial topic specification:
This new topic under Terraformation is offered for those who might be interested in helping to figure out how to harvest water from comets that pass by Mars.
Your contribution is on topic, in the sense that water would certainly be harvested if an entire comet is directed on a collision course with a celestial object. However, I agree that it ** is ** very different in scope from the initial postings.
It seems to me quite reasonable to imagine a determined crew of engineers putting together a water harvesting expedition, to intercept a comet similar to the one that passed Mars is 2014. Whatever mass can be liberated from the moving comet can be decelerated over time and through a series of clever maneuvers, to deliver a cargo to a location where it can be harvested.
A time scale of 10 Earth years from today seems reasonable to me, for a successful execution of such an expedition, if a person of the caliber of Elon Musk or perhaps even Jeff Bezos were to decide it was worth taking the risk.
On the nation state side of the ledger, I can easily imagine Vladimir Putin deciding harvesting a comet is worth his consideration, if doing so would place Russia in an advantageous position with respect to whatever space development goals they may have in mind.
Thank you again for adding an interesting (and expansive) perspective to the topic.
(th)
]]>Else, I guess you just have to send ships to it to emplace the rigging others have previously suggested. If you could get comets into the trojan asteroid belt, they may remain stable for some time as far as evaporation. Then you might mine them. If you could get a gas giant planet to assist in the relocation by gravity, that seems fun. However we really should install human populations around the solar system before we would risk the extinction of the human race.
]]>Thank you for your interest (and indirect support) of the Comet Harvesting topic!
It would seem likely your prediction will come to pass. Each entrepreneur looking at prospects for a successful business in this specialty will surely consider the advantages and drawbacks of each approach to obtaining pure, fresh, potable water for exchange with others for valuable commodities.
It is worth noting that the water collected from comets or other passing repositories of material will most definitely need to be "processed" before it can be offered for sale or trade. The question for the entrepreneur to try to answer before making an investment in any option is which is likely to yield the greatest return for whatever investment is made.
A factor for any business planner is certainty. It is reasonable to try to increase confidence levels wherever possible, in taking on an inherently risky venture. The presence of abundant water (ice) can be confirmed remotely, so the risks of trying to dock with a comet will be rewarded with a payload of material suitable for (relatively inexpensive) processing at whatever processing location is chosen.
(th)
]]>For our Moon, Hydroxyl seems to move about. And apparently some water is produced. This requires the solar wind to push Hydrogen/Protons into the lunar soil. However that is not enough. It is apparently required for small impactors to contribute the energy to produce water from the Hydrogen/Protons, and the Oxygen in the lunar soil.
Mercury may be hot enough in places just from the sunlight.
So, the moons of Mars seem to be rubble piles and are very porous. Inside, I would expect them to be relatively cold. So at the very least their may be hydrated minerals inside of them. Just my guess.
Comets? Ya, OK. Down the road.
]]>For Louis re #6
As a student of economics, your vision of potential markets on Mars, or those which might be served by Mars residents, is well documented in the NewMars database.
I was surprised, therefore, to see your momentary hesitation to recognize the market opportunity for an enterprising comet harvester. It isn't a question of water being available on Mars, as you have correctly pointed out. It ** is ** a question of how a clever entrepreneur prices deliverables to acquire and maintain a sustainable share of the market.
Some will surely make the investments needed to provide a reliable supply of fresh, clean, potable water from the resources available on Mars. The competition I am seeing will come from those who acquire rights to off-planet resources, and provide fresh, clean, potable water to Mars customers at prices that are just a tiny bit lower than are possible for the planet bound supplier.
For Phobos, which will (according to some forecasts) become a major shipping hub for Mars, an off-world supplier will be much appreciated, and (i suspect) the competition there will be between off-world suppliers, and NOT from planet bound suppliers.
(th)
As a student of economics, your vision of potential markets on Mars, or those which might be served by Mars residents, is well documented in the NewMars database.
I was surprised, therefore, to see your momentary hesitation to recognize the market opportunity for an enterprising comet harvester. It isn't a question of water being available on Mars, as you have correctly pointed out. It ** is ** a question of how a clever entrepreneur prices deliverables to acquire and maintain a sustainable share of the market.
Some will surely make the investments needed to provide a reliable supply of fresh, clean, potable water from the resources available on Mars. The competition I am seeing will come from those who acquire rights to off-planet resources, and provide fresh, clean, potable water to Mars customers at prices that are just a tiny bit lower than are possible for the planet bound supplier.
For Phobos, which will (according to some forecasts) become a major shipping hub for Mars, an off-world supplier will be much appreciated, and (i suspect) the competition there will be between off-world suppliers, and NOT from planet bound suppliers.
(th)
]]>