New Mars Forums
You are not logged in.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
Announcement
#751 2026-03-07 15:38:39
- SpaceNut
- Administrator
- From: New Hampshire
- Registered: 2004-07-22
- Posts: 30,646
Re: International Space Station (ISS / Alpha)
NASA must delay deorbiting the ISS, U.S. lawmakers say
U.S. lawmakers are moving to delay the International Space Station’s retirement, giving more time for commercial replacements to be built
Meghan Bartels
Fri, March 6, 2026 at 1:37 PM EST
NASA could soon be scrambling to shore up the U.S.’s presence in low-Earth orbit, thanks to a key Senate committee that wants the space agency to extend the life of the International Space Station (ISS) past its current retirement date. If made law, the move would have international consequences for human space exploration.
The Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation has added a draft measure to the NASA Authorization Act of 2026 that would order the space agency to extend ISS operations through 2032, two years longer than currently planned. The draft measure also forbids NASA from deorbiting the station until a replacement commercial space station is operational.
Perhaps the most ugly truth of human spaceflight is that the ISS is old and its days are numbered. Construction began in 1998, and humans have maintained a continuous presence on the orbiting outpost since November 2000. But space is a harsh environment, and the longer the massive station remains in orbit, the higher the chances are that a catastrophic failure could send it tumbling down to Earth.
Right now NASA and its international partners hope to keep the ISS working through 2030. (The station was built such that it requires both NASA and the Russian space agency’s full attentions; neither side can operate it alone.)
Then the station will die: SpaceX is building a beefed-up version of its Dragon vehicle to safely destroy the ISS in 2031. NASA hired SpaceX for the task in June 2024 on a contract worth up to $843 million—a remarkably tight time line to design and build a specialized vehicle for an operation that must proceed flawlessly or risk raining debris on Earth’s surface.
At the same time, NASA has also been working to support private companies to develop new orbital outposts that it could use to house astronauts and their research in low-Earth orbit. NASA worked with the now defunct company Bigelow Aerospace to test an inflatable module, for example, and the agency has hired Axiom Space to build what will initially be a module for the ISS but will subsequently undock and fly independently as the seed of a new station.
Yet just as NASA has repeatedly delayed the ISS’s retirement—the station was built to last 15 years—so, too, have the time lines for would-be commercial replacements slipped.
The Senate committee—and particularly its leaders, Republican senator Ted Cruz of Texas and Democratic senator Maria Cantwell of Washington State—are trying to speed things along via the authorization bill. Congress is meant to approve an annual authorization bill to set NASA’s priorities and an appropriations bill that allocates money, but the former is often neglected; the most recent finalized NASA authorization bill dates to 2022. And like all bills, the proposed measure must be approved by the full Senate and House of Representatives and then signed by the president to become law.
But even if the measure never becomes law, it’s an important signal of how key legislators think about NASA’s purpose and priorities. The language is stark. It sets an aggressive time line for making real progress on establishing commercial space stations: under the bill, NASA would need to release requirements for such stations within 60 days and final language to solicit proposals within 90 days and would have to enter contracts with two or more companies within 180 days. And the bill explicitly links the space station’s retirement schedule with the successful operation of a commercial replacement by forbidding a controlled deorbit until that time.
NASA and U.S. legislators alike have long worried that the inevitable demise of the ISS—whether controlled or not—could leave the country with no capacity for long-duration human spaceflight. Currently, the only other existing space station is China’s Tiangong station, which launched in 2021. Ultimately, it doesn’t seem like the U.S. is ready to give up on the ISS just yet.
Offline
Like button can go here
#752 2026-03-07 18:57:30
- GW Johnson
- Member
- From: McGregor, Texas USA
- Registered: 2011-12-04
- Posts: 6,178
- Website
Re: International Space Station (ISS / Alpha)
The thing is wearing out. The Zvevda module cracks and leaks are only one example. Sooner or later there will be a catastrophic failure in some module, causing a fast depressurization, and death of the crew. The longer this thing's mission is extended, the more likely such a fatal event is likely to occur. Simple as that!
The problem here is NOT how long the ISS can fly, it is that replacements for it have been delayed too long already. Corporate business is OK with that delay, greedy as they are; the problem has been inadequate government setting of goals for that corporate business arena by letting appropriate contracts. And that is mostly Congress's fault, but substantially partly the administration's fault, across multiple administrations.
GW
Last edited by GW Johnson (2026-03-07 18:57:42)
GW Johnson
McGregor, Texas
"There is nothing as expensive as a dead crew, especially one dead from a bad management decision"
Offline
Like button can go here
#753 2026-03-07 19:15:08
- SpaceNut
- Administrator
- From: New Hampshire
- Registered: 2004-07-22
- Posts: 30,646
Re: International Space Station (ISS / Alpha)
The original maker is no longer in business and all tooling is gone to make replacements.
So we are left to disposal at some point. Even the Halo stuff for the moon is basically junk as its not being done correctly by the clowns....
Offline
Like button can go here