You are not logged in.
Two weeks actually and about 60% of the trip will be through the van allen belts in some way or another.
It's a problem.
Offline
If you can only make one trip a month using the cable, then you might as well spend the elevator money on making regular rockets better, or making Shuttle-II.
[i]"The power of accurate observation is often called cynicism by those that do not have it." - George Bernard Shaw[/i]
[i]The glass is at 50% of capacity[/i]
Offline
I've been looking around for solutions and I found this:
http://www.tethers.com/HiVOLT.html]http … iVOLT.html
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/r … 20916.html
Offline
Ah Trevor, thanks for the links. I was wondering myself if it wouldn't be possible to generate a magnetic field above the 'cars' to push these dangerous charged particles out of the way.
And Bill, please don't be mad, I know you are pointing out that a space elevator isn't practical (profitable) for aspiring buisnesspeople, but Trev raises a good point. We must look at how much cheaper a space elevator would be compared to conventional rockets. More importantly, today's rockets are fantastic when they don't use up their fuel escaping Earth's gravity well.
Also, assuming that the demand is there to use our SE like O'Hare, feeding and taking care of our travelers can offset the cost of the SE. Make the tickets cheap, but charge them $10 for a pack of peanuts
Offline