Deep Asteroid Crater Habitat Proposal for Mars

Steve Stewart · 2023-11-05 13:06:30

PhotonBytes (#25),
You're sure bringing up a lot of good questions. I'll try best to answer some of them. Here they are:

Has Robert Zubrin considered this greener method to terraform Mars vs Elon Musk's nuclear option?

I don't know what Dr Zubrin and Elon Musk have in mind. I remember Chris McKay giving a zoom presentation at the Mars annual convention a few years ago. He stated that he had done the math and the nuclear option would not work. (Dr. Chris McKay has been on some TV documentaries about Mars Direct, and other Mars documentaries).

I believe the thinking is that if we can get enough of the carbon dioxide to turn into a gas at the poles, then it will create positive feedback. Releasing the greenhouse gas CO2 into the Martian atmosphere will cause Mars to warm, which will cause more CO2 to be released, causing more of a greenhouse effect, and so on. I least that's the way I understand it.

The frozen CO2 at the poles is reflective, so it reflects energy (heat) from the sun back into space. As the frozen CO2 evaporates, the dark ground beneath is exposed. The dark surface absorbs more sunlight (energy), causing the planet to warm, which melts more CO2, which exposes more Martian surface, which absorbs more solar heat, creating positive feedback. (The same thing is happening on Earth. As the poles of Earth melt it is exposing more (dark) surface area, creating more heating, causing more melting. -- positive feedback). According to Dr McKay, 100 nuclear bombs or so exploding on Mars isn't enough energy to get this positive feedback going.

...and shielded from solar wind with the crater walls and longer journey for such solar radiation though the atmosphere sideways to reach the poles.

What you are saying is true. But keep in mind that a thicker atmosphere will also provide more shielding against radiation. Also keep in mind that as the Martian atmosphere thickens, the expansion ratio gets less and less. In post #24 above I mentioned the expansion of methane from a solid to a gas is probably on the order of 130,000 to 1. After a big comet, or several small comets, have come into contact with Mars, that expansion ratio will drop, say to 120,000 to 1, then 110,000 to 1, eventually 10,000 to 1, and so on.

Another thing to keep in mind about comets, is that they contain cyanide. This was discovered in 1910 when Halley's Comet made a close pass by Earth. I made mention of this on a post in another thread. (See link below)

Post #35 (Halley's Comet contains cycnide)

By the way, I don't see this as an issue. If you have time sometime check out a proposal that I posted on this forum. It's rather long, about 90-95 pages. In this proposal I show how impurities from the Martian atmosphere can be burned off.

Proposal: Storing Energy, Introducing a "Cell", a Soil Factory on Mars

...No radioactivity side effects. Also more power compared to nukes.

Once a comet comes into contact with Mars, it does produce a lot of energy which gets converted into heat energy. So this does cause a (temporary) heating affect. After the initial blast, all of the heating from then on comes from the sun. Greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide and methane, act like a blanket that hold heat onto the planet. If a large amount of methane were released into the Martian atmosphere, it would take time for this heat to accumulate. But unlike nukes, it would be never ending. As long as there is methane in the Martian atmosphere, heat from the sun, which is constantly coming in, will cause the planet to warm until some point of equilibrium is reached. Reaching that point of equilibrium could take a few Earth-years.

How long methane will last in the Martian atmosphere is another big question mark. Mars burps up about 270 tons of methane every Earth-year. Somehow this methane breaks down and goes away. My guess is that breaks down from the intense ultraviolet radiation on Mars, but I don't know. (UV light is another thing we have to worry about on Mars).

On Earth the ozone layer blocks about 99% of the UV rays hitting Earth. Mars doesn't have an ozone layer. So even if we loaded up the Martian atmosphere with methane, I'm not so sure it's sustainable. Assuming it breaks down, I don't know what it breaks down into. On Mars, does methane break down into another greenhouse gas? I don't know the answer to that, but it would be nice if it did.

Robert's own invention the nuclear salt water rocket can redirect kuiper belt objects to hit one of the poles.

Actually you could just move asteroids from the asteroid belt as Void mentioned. All that is needed is to move some asteroids into the orbit of Mars, and let Mars run into it. There wouldn't be any aiming doing it that way, and it wouldn't provide a way of blasting a hole. But if it brought hydrocarbons and/or water to Mars it would thicken the atmosphere with greenhouse gases. According to the Wikipedia article "Asteroid belt", the asteroid belt consists mainly of three types of asteroids. One type is "Carbonaceous asteroids" which contain carbon (hopefully hydrocarbons, which are greenhouse gases).

Wikipedia states:

Carbonaceous asteroids, as their name suggests, are carbon-rich. They dominate the asteroid belt's outer regions, and are rare in the inner belt. Together they comprise over 75% of the visible asteroids. They are redder in hue than the other asteroids and have a very low albedo. Their surface compositions are similar to carbonaceous chondrite meteorites. Chemically, their spectra match the primordial composition of the early Solar System, with the lighter elements and volatiles removed.

PhotonBytes · 2023-11-05 14:37:24

I entertained your idea to AI:

https://chat.openai.com/share/8fecbaeb- … 62761fe906

Feel free to talk to it more if you feel I didn't interrogate it enough. AI chatbot has been known to make mistakes but it thinks there are more problems crashing lots of nearby asteroid compared to my single strike idea with a far away comet. First of all with my single strike idea the effects are localized and any global effects are positive while the many asteroid crashing onto mars creates global negative effects. Then it thinks there is insufficient fluids in the nearby asteroids to make that much of an addition to the Martian atmosphere. The idea of using the single comet is the higher potential energy required to make a 50km deep crater, so that crater is eliminated in your asteroid crashing scenario, you have to wait it out instead of getting an instant habitable zone at the bottom of the crater. Well near instant, u have to wait for the crater to cool down somewhat and let all the new oceans and lakes settle before landing anyone there. You get the idea. Otherwise I would have made the topic about crashing asteroids into Mars but I knew that the potential energy just isnt there to create the crater and also it might be tough to aim it at the poles from where they are situated. I am assuming a suitable kuiper belt object or oort cloud object can be found above the martian orbit to hit Mars's north pole while its on the far side of the sun relative to Earth so that the media doesnt panic us with the possibility that we might send a planet killer to mars that could hit us instead if we get the trajectory slightly off angle. Although an AI pilot program should be able to manage the precise navigation.

Is anyone here able to get Dr Zubrin to weigh in on this topic? Anyone here knows him personally?

Im studying your soil cell proposal now.

Last edited by PhotonBytes (2023-11-06 00:52:19)

Void · 2023-11-06 15:47:40

One related ting that could be considered it to poke a hole in the Martian crust and stimulate an artesian well. My notion on this is that it might be done in Hellas . A requirement is that there does exist an aquifer under the permafrost. That is not proven or discovered.

To poke a hole might use an object collision or a set of nuclear bombs.

If you got the permafrost to leak then you would need to add heat to the resulting reservoir, maybe reactors, or maybe space based solar power. And you would have to have a method to continuously clean dust off of the ice.

Just a thought since you members have not continued at this time.

Done

PhotonBytes · 2023-11-06 15:59:51

Void wrote:

One related ting that could be considered it to poke a hole in the Martian crust and stimulate an artesian well. My notion on this is that it might be done in Hellas . A requirement is that there does exist an aquifer under the permafrost. That is not proven or discovered.
To poke a hole might use an object collision or a set of nuclear bombs.
If you got the permafrost to leak then you would need to add heat to the resulting reservoir, maybe reactors, or maybe space based solar power. And you would have to have a method to continuously clean dust off of the ice.
Just a thought since you members have not continued at this time.
Done

I considered Hellas originally but AI says that the polar option limits the effects non globally which I think is a huge political plus. I think we have to keep in mind the public sentiment on this idea so people don't freak out in outrage that we are destroying the planet entirely. But please reply if I missed or misunderstood something. Will "poking" cause a global tsunami of sand and dust and earth quakes?

By the way here is an image of my idea that I tweeted around:

As you can I am suggesting we only strike Mars while it's safely on the opposite side of the sun so that again public sentiment will not rile up in outrage and panic that we are sending a planet killer that could kill us all if our comet's trajectory is slightly off-course.

But I am sure people will still ask if Mars will hit us if we alter it's orbit slightly by doing this. What do you think? Will it? Could it?

UPDATE===================== AI

If I instead cause a kuiper belt comet like object to hit one of Mar's poles do you think the material from the comet will add atmosphere to Mars?
ChatGPT
Impacting a Kuiper belt comet-like object on Mars could indeed introduce new materials and potentially contribute to an increase in its atmospheric mass. Comets are known to contain various ices, including water ice, carbon dioxide (CO2) ice, and other volatile compounds. When a comet collides with a planet, the heat generated during the impact can cause these ices to vaporize and release gases into the atmosphere.

Here are some considerations for such an impact:

Atmospheric Contribution: The release of gases from the comet's ices, particularly water vapor and other volatiles, would contribute to Mars' atmosphere. However, the extent of the contribution would depend on the size and composition of the impacting comet.

Short-Term Effects: The increase in atmospheric mass would likely be temporary, as the Martian atmosphere is relatively thin, and gases can be lost to space over time. To maintain a thicker atmosphere, long-term terraforming efforts would be necessary.

Environmental Impact: The impact itself would create a significant disturbance, potentially generating massive craters and ejecting material into space. It could also lead to changes in the Martian climate and temperature.

Planetary Protection: Such an impact would require careful consideration of planetary protection protocols to avoid introducing Earth's microorganisms to Mars or contaminating any potential Martian life.

Targeted Impacts: To achieve specific terraforming goals, it would be important to target comet impacts strategically, considering factors like the planet's geology, climate, and the gases needed for a more habitable atmosphere.

In summary, impacting a comet on Mars could contribute to the planet's atmosphere, but it would be a complex and potentially disruptive process. It would be just one step in a broader terraforming strategy that would require careful planning, long-term commitment, and the integration of various techniques to transform Mars into a more habitable world.

User
Is there a chance that doing this will alter the Martian orbit to collide with Earth?
ChatGPT
Impacting Mars with a comet or any other celestial object from the Kuiper belt would not have a significant chance of altering Mars' orbit to the extent that it would collide with Earth. The reason for this is that celestial mechanics and orbital dynamics make such an outcome extremely unlikely for several reasons:

Mass Differences: Mars and Earth have significantly different masses. Earth is much more massive than Mars, and objects in space are primarily influenced by the gravitational pull of the more massive body. Changing Mars' orbit to the point where it would intersect with Earth's orbit would require an extraordinary amount of energy, far beyond anything we could achieve with the impact of a single comet.

Conservation of Angular Momentum: In space, angular momentum is conserved. Any change in an object's orbit requires the application of a significant force over time. A single impact event, even with a comet, would not provide enough force to drastically alter Mars' orbit to the point of collision with Earth.

Predictable Orbital Mechanics: The orbits of planets in our solar system are well-understood and highly predictable. Altering a planet's orbit to the point of causing a collision with another planet would be an extraordinary event and is not something that can happen easily or accidentally.

Advanced Planning: Any mission to intentionally change the orbit of a planet would require advanced planning, careful calculations, and the application of a sustained and substantial force over a long period.

In summary, the possibility of accidentally altering the orbit of Mars to the extent that it would collide with Earth through an impact event is virtually non-existent. Such a scenario would require a level of energy, precision, and planning that far exceeds anything within our current technological capabilities.

If the comet misses Mars is it possible it could swing back and hit Earth?
ChatGPT
It's theoretically possible for a comet to have its trajectory altered during an encounter with a planet, like Mars, in such a way that it could lead to future close approaches with Earth. However, the likelihood of this happening is extremely low for several reasons:

Precision Required: Changing the trajectory of a comet in a way that would lead to a future collision with Earth would require an extremely precise and unlikely set of circumstances during the initial encounter with Mars.

Conservation of Energy: In the absence of further encounters or additional gravitational interactions with other celestial bodies, comets tend to follow predictable trajectories determined by their initial conditions. It is challenging to significantly alter these trajectories with a single planetary encounter.

Long Timeframes: The timescales involved in such orbital changes are typically very long, spanning thousands to millions of years. It's unlikely that a comet would return to threaten Earth within a human-relevant timeframe.

Monitoring and Mitigation: Scientists closely monitor the trajectories of known comets and asteroids that could potentially impact Earth. If a comet's orbit were found to pose a future collision risk, there would be time to develop and implement mitigation strategies to alter its course and prevent an impact.

In summary, while it's theoretically possible for a comet to have its trajectory altered in a way that could lead to a future close approach with Earth, the chances of such a scenario occurring are extremely remote. Scientists actively track and study the orbits of comets and asteroids that could pose a threat to Earth, and if a potential threat were identified, efforts would be made to mitigate the risk.

User
So if I make a 50km deep crater in the pole to sustain 1 bar of air pressure, explain to me how this is going to be more localized if most of the debrie is still dirt and not ice compared to hitting hellas planitia?

ChatGPT
I apologize for any confusion. Creating a 50-kilometer deep crater on a Martian pole or anywhere else on the planet would indeed have widespread effects and not be localized. The impact would involve a massive release of energy, create a colossal crater, and displace a significant amount of material, both ice and regolith (soil-like material). Such an impact would have far-reaching consequences on the Martian environment, similar to or potentially more extensive than an impact in Hellas Planitia.

In the context of terraforming Mars or making significant planetary modifications, both polar and non-polar impacts would have global-scale and long-lasting effects. The creation of a crater of this scale would be a significant, planet-altering event and not a localized phenomenon. I apologize for any previous statements that may have suggested otherwise.

To create a sustainable and habitable environment on Mars, other comprehensive approaches would be required beyond a single impact event. These approaches might include controlled release of greenhouse gases, long-term maintenance of a stable atmosphere, and careful management of surface conditions, among other strategies.

User
Is it still better to hit the pole so that the eplosion will melt and evaporate the ice there to add to the atmosphere and liquid water for the crater?
ChatGPT
Hitting a Martian pole, where there is a higher concentration of water ice, with the goal of creating a substantial impact crater could indeed lead to the release of water vapor into the atmosphere and potentially create a location where liquid water might briefly exist in the form of a temporary crater lake. This could have potential benefits for terraforming efforts, including increasing atmospheric water content and providing a source of liquid water.

However, it's important to recognize the challenges and limitations of this approach:

Short-Term Effects: The increase in atmospheric water content and the presence of liquid water would likely be temporary, as Mars has a thin atmosphere, and water can be lost to space over time. To maintain a more permanent water-rich atmosphere and surface conditions, sustained efforts would be necessary.

Global vs. Local Impact: While an impact on a polar region could affect the local environment and the immediate vicinity of the crater, it might not have a significant global effect on the entire planet's atmosphere and climate. Achieving global changes would require a broader terraforming strategy.

Environmental Challenges: The immediate aftermath of such a large impact would involve extreme conditions, such as high temperatures, radiation exposure, and the formation of a massive crater. These conditions would need to be addressed for long-term habitability.

Planetary Protection: Careful consideration of planetary protection measures would be necessary to avoid introducing Earth microorganisms to Mars or contaminating any potential Martian life.

In summary, while impacting a Martian pole could have specific benefits for a terraforming effort, it is just one part of a larger, carefully planned strategy for making Mars more habitable. Other aspects of terraforming, such as controlling the planet's climate, raising atmospheric pressure, and providing a stable and sustainable environment, would also be essential considerations.

================

Looks like AI is walking back about polar being a non global option.

==============AND THEN THIS HAPPENED====
User
I would argue that the polar ice would absorb much more of the energy if they werent there in other strike zones
ChatGPT
Your point about the polar ice affecting the absorption of impact energy is valid. In the context of a planetary impact, the presence of ice or other materials at the impact site can indeed influence the distribution and absorption of energy. Here are some factors to consider:

Absorption of Energy: The type of material at the impact site can affect how much energy is absorbed by the planet. Ice can absorb some of the impact energy, but it can also be vaporized, leading to the release of gases into the atmosphere.

Impact Angle: The angle at which the impacting object strikes the planet is a critical factor. A direct, vertical impact transfers more energy to the planet's surface, while an oblique impact can create different effects, potentially with more lateral distribution of energy.

Material Properties: The density, composition, and properties of the impacting object also play a significant role in determining the outcome of an impact. Objects with different compositions and densities may have varying effects.

Local Environment: The specific characteristics of the impact site, such as the presence of ice, regolith, and subsurface materials, can influence how energy is distributed, how much heat is generated, and what consequences result from the impact.

While ice can absorb some energy and influence the effects of an impact, it's important to keep in mind that impact events on planetary bodies involve an enormous release of energy. The overall effects depend on a complex interplay of multiple factors, including the size, velocity, and composition of the impacting object, as well as the planet's characteristics and local environment.

In the case of Mars, any impact on the polar ice caps would indeed have unique effects related to the release of gases from the ice, but the consequences would still extend beyond the immediate impact site.

Last edited by PhotonBytes (2023-11-06 17:20:33)

Void · 2023-11-06 16:16:05

Of course the risks are very high. But we are not at all near doing any of this in my lifetime. With life extension maybe in your lifetime, but that will be your problem, not mine.

I am soon to not to be involved.

Not a shocker, for now we all have to go, sometime. But I don't have a ticket on that ride that I am aware of just yet, but anticipate one.

The public can take a leap. They expect the willing to change their diapers as if they were babies.

Not impressed so much.

Done

PhotonBytes · 2023-11-07 04:48:11

I can see that Dr Zubrin has seen my linkedin message now, fingers crossed!

Here is a picture to keep you all inspired:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korolev_% … _crater%29

==================================================================

Update from AI about atmospheric increase on Mars:

=====================================

Give me a rough estimate range of atmospheric increase percentagewise

ChatGPT
Providing a rough estimate range for the percentage increase in Mars' atmospheric mass due to an impact by Halley's Comet is challenging due to the numerous variables involved, including the comet's mass, impact velocity, and the proportion of volatile ices released. However, as a very rough estimate, it could potentially increase the atmospheric mass by several percentage points.

Keep in mind that this is a highly speculative scenario, and the exact outcome would depend on many factors. Additionally, the impact's long-term consequences on the Martian environment, climate, and any potential future human colonization would be complex and require extensive analysis.

User
Do your best
ChatGPT
As a very rough and speculative estimate, crashing Halley's Comet into a Martian pole could potentially increase Mars' atmospheric mass by approximately 1% to 10%. This range is based on the fact that comets contain a significant amount of volatile ices, and the release of these ices upon impact could contribute to an increase in atmospheric mass. However, the exact percentage would depend on the specific properties of Halley's Comet, the impact conditions, and the efficiency of transferring comet materials to the Martian atmosphere. Please note that this is a highly hypothetical scenario and the actual outcome could vary widely.

User
Lets assume the speed of the comet is high enough to create a 50km deep crater
ChatGPT
Creating a 50-kilometer (about 31 miles) deep crater on Mars with an impact would indeed be a significant event, and the consequences for the Martian environment would be substantial. However, it's important to note that such an impact would be highly destructive and could have severe consequences, including potentially catastrophic effects on the Martian surface and atmosphere.

If we assume that Halley's Comet, with its estimated nucleus size of about 15 kilometers, is moving at a speed high enough to create a 50-kilometer deep crater, it would release a tremendous amount of energy upon impact. The exact percentage increase in Mars' atmospheric mass would depend on various factors, including the efficiency of transferring comet materials to the Martian atmosphere.

To provide a very rough estimate based on the size and composition of Halley's Comet and the energy release of such a large impact, it could potentially increase Mars' atmospheric mass by a substantial percentage, perhaps in the range of 100% to 500% or more. However, these estimates are highly speculative and should be taken as rough approximations. The long-term consequences of such an impact, including its impact on Mars' climate and the potential for widespread destruction, would be complex and require detailed modeling and analysis.

User
Before you said 1-10% why does the increase speed of the comet increase the percentage by so much more?
ChatGPT
I apologize for any inconsistency in my previous responses. The estimated percentage increase in Mars' atmospheric mass is indeed influenced by various factors, including the impact energy, the size and composition of the comet, and the efficiency of transferring comet materials to the Martian atmosphere.

The reason for the increase in the estimated percentage when considering a higher-speed impact is the significantly greater energy released during such an impact. A high-speed impact would create a much larger crater and release more energy, potentially liberating a larger volume of comet material into the Martian atmosphere. As a result, the potential contribution to the Martian atmospheric mass could be greater.

The percentage estimates provided earlier are rough and speculative, and the actual outcome of such an impact would depend on numerous factors, including the specific properties of the comet and the impact conditions. These estimates are intended to give a general sense of the potential impact on Mars' atmosphere, but the exact numbers would require detailed modeling and analysis to determine.

User
Did you also consider the extra energy would liberate also more of the martian ice?
ChatGPT
Yes, you are correct. A high-speed impact by a comet could release not only more of the comet's materials but also more Martian surface materials, including water ice. The impact energy would lead to the excavation and ejection of a significant volume of Martian material, and this would contribute to the potential increase in atmospheric mass.

This effect, combined with the release of volatile ices from the comet, could indeed lead to a larger increase in the Martian atmospheric mass compared to a lower-speed impact. The estimation of the exact percentage increase in the atmosphere would depend on a complex interplay of factors, including the size and composition of the comet, the impact velocity, and the efficiency of transferring materials to the atmosphere.

Again, these estimates are highly speculative, and the actual outcome would require detailed modeling and analysis to provide a more precise assessment of the impact's consequences on the Martian atmosphere and environment.

User
What would be the impact speed?
ChatGPT
To create a crater that's 50 kilometers (about 31 miles) deep on Mars with an impact, the impact speed would need to be extremely high. The specific impact speed required depends on various factors, including the size and density of the comet or asteroid, the angle of impact, and the properties of the Martian surface.

As a point of reference, impacts that create large craters on planetary bodies typically involve speeds on the order of tens of kilometers per second (km/s) or even higher. For example, the asteroid that is believed to have caused the Chicxulub crater on Earth, associated with the extinction of the dinosaurs, is estimated to have impacted at a speed of around 20 km/s (about 72,000 kilometers per hour or 45,000 miles per hour).

To create a 50-kilometer deep crater on Mars, the impact speed would likely need to be significantly higher than this, although the exact speed would depend on the specific parameters of the impact scenario and the properties of Halley's Comet. It's important to note that an impact of such magnitude would have severe and far-reaching consequences for Mars and would be a subject of scientific and ethical concern.

User
How many km/s?
ChatGPT
Creating a crater that's 50 kilometers deep on Mars would require an extremely high impact speed, likely in the range of tens of kilometers per second (km/s). The precise impact speed would depend on various factors, including the size and density of the impacting object (in this case, Halley's Comet), the angle of impact, and the properties of the Martian surface at the impact site.

A rough estimate could place the impact speed at perhaps 30-50 km/s or higher to create such a deep crater. However, it's important to emphasize that this is a highly speculative scenario, and the actual impact conditions would need to be thoroughly studied through modeling and analysis. Additionally, it's worth reiterating that an impact of this magnitude would have severe and widespread consequences for Mars and its environment.

User
What would be the impact speed?
ChatGPT
To create a crater that's 50 kilometers (about 31 miles) deep on Mars with an impact, the impact speed would need to be extremely high. The specific impact speed required depends on various factors, including the size and density of the comet or asteroid, the angle of impact, and the properties of the Martian surface.

As a point of reference, impacts that create large craters on planetary bodies typically involve speeds on the order of tens of kilometers per second (km/s) or even higher. For example, the asteroid that is believed to have caused the Chicxulub crater on Earth, associated with the extinction of the dinosaurs, is estimated to have impacted at a speed of around 20 km/s (about 72,000 kilometers per hour or 45,000 miles per hour).

To create a 50-kilometer deep crater on Mars, the impact speed would likely need to be significantly higher than this, although the exact speed would depend on the specific parameters of the impact scenario and the properties of Halley's Comet. It's important to note that an impact of such magnitude would have severe and far-reaching consequences for Mars and would be a subject of scientific and ethical concern.

User
How many km/s?
ChatGPT
Creating a crater that's 50 kilometers deep on Mars would require an extremely high impact speed, likely in the range of tens of kilometers per second (km/s). The precise impact speed would depend on various factors, including the size and density of the impacting object (in this case, Halley's Comet), the angle of impact, and the properties of the Martian surface at the impact site.

A rough estimate could place the impact speed at perhaps 30-50 km/s or higher to create such a deep crater. However, it's important to emphasize that this is a highly speculative scenario, and the actual impact conditions would need to be thoroughly studied through modeling and analysis. Additionally, it's worth reiterating that an impact of this magnitude would have severe and widespread consequences for Mars and its environment.

User
What will be the new air pressure at Martian datum, Hellas Planitia and at the bottom of the new crater in the pole?
ChatGPT
Calculating the new air pressure at Martian datum (the average surface level), Hellas Planitia, and at the bottom of the new crater following a hypothetical impact by Halley's Comet would require detailed modeling and precise data on the impact conditions, such as the size and composition of the comet, the impact speed, and the angle of impact. Without this specific information, I can't provide exact values, but I can offer some general considerations:

Martian Datum (Average Surface Level):

The current average surface pressure on Mars is about 6.4 millibars (mb), which is roughly 0.6% of Earth's atmospheric pressure.
Following a high-speed impact by a large comet, the addition of material to the Martian atmosphere could significantly increase the surface pressure. The actual increase would depend on the mass and composition of the comet and the efficiency of transferring its materials to the atmosphere.
Hellas Planitia:

Hellas Planitia is a large impact basin on Mars with a lower elevation compared to the average surface. It has a slightly higher atmospheric pressure than the Martian average due to its lower elevation.
The impact could further increase the atmospheric pressure in Hellas Planitia, but the exact amount would depend on the impact's location within the basin and its properties.
Bottom of the New Crater:

The bottom of the new crater would experience the most significant changes in atmospheric pressure, especially if it's 50 kilometers deep.
The impact would release a substantial volume of material into the atmosphere, potentially leading to a temporary increase in atmospheric pressure at the crater's base.
The specific increase in pressure at the bottom of the crater would depend on the impact's characteristics, including the amount and type of material ejected.
To obtain precise values for the new air pressures at these locations, a detailed numerical simulation using impact modeling software and specific input parameters would be required. Such simulations are beyond the scope of a simple text-based response and would be the subject of a complex scientific study.

User
So answer the question best you can
ChatGPT
Without specific data and detailed modeling, I can't provide exact values for the new air pressures at Martian datum, Hellas Planitia, and at the bottom of the new crater following a hypothetical impact by Halley's Comet. The increase in atmospheric pressure would depend on the size, composition, and speed of the comet, as well as the efficiency of transferring its materials to the Martian atmosphere.

However, following such an impact, it's reasonable to expect a significant and temporary increase in atmospheric pressure at the crater's base, which could be several times higher than the pre-impact atmospheric pressure. This would result from the release of materials from both the comet and the Martian surface. The atmospheric pressure would gradually equilibrate over time as the added materials disperse throughout the Martian atmosphere.

For specific and accurate values, a sophisticated impact modeling study would be necessary, and it's a complex scientific endeavor that requires precise data on the impact conditions and Martian properties.

User
Make reasonable assumptions
ChatGPT
Assuming a high-speed impact by Halley's Comet that creates a 50-kilometer deep crater on Mars, we can make some rough, reasonable assumptions for the changes in atmospheric pressure:

Martian Datum (Average Surface Level):

The current average surface pressure on Mars is about 6.4 millibars (mb), or roughly 0.6% of Earth's atmospheric pressure.
Following the impact, the addition of material to the Martian atmosphere could lead to a temporary increase in surface pressure. A rough estimate might be an increase of several times the pre-impact pressure. So, for example, it might temporarily reach tens or even hundreds of millibars.
Hellas Planitia:

Hellas Planitia is already at a lower elevation, so its atmospheric pressure is slightly higher than the Martian average.
The impact within Hellas Planitia could result in a more significant increase in atmospheric pressure compared to the pre-impact conditions, perhaps reaching hundreds of millibars.
Bottom of the New Crater:

The bottom of the new crater would experience the most substantial increase in atmospheric pressure.
Depending on the size and composition of the comet, as well as the depth of the crater, the pressure at the bottom could be substantially higher than at Hellas Planitia, possibly reaching several hundred millibars or more.
Please note that these are very rough, speculative estimates and the actual values would depend on many factors, including the specifics of the impact event and the efficiency of transferring materials to the Martian atmosphere. Additionally, these changes in atmospheric pressure would likely be temporary, and over time, the atmosphere would gradually equilibrate back to its normal conditions as the added materials disperse throughout Mars' thin atmosphere.

User
Give educated guesses of bars for each 3 regions
ChatGPT
While these educated guesses are highly speculative, I can provide rough estimates for the changes in atmospheric pressure in each of the three regions following a hypothetical high-speed impact by Halley's Comet:

Martian Datum (Average Surface Level):

Following the impact, it's possible that the atmospheric pressure at Martian datum could temporarily increase to around 100 to 500 millibars (mb) or even higher. This is a very rough estimate, and the actual value would depend on the impact conditions.
Hellas Planitia:

Given its lower elevation, Hellas Planitia has a higher atmospheric pressure compared to the Martian average. Following the impact within Hellas Planitia, it might see an even more substantial increase in atmospheric pressure, possibly reaching several hundred millibars or even into the kilobar range.
Bottom of the New Crater:

The bottom of the new crater would experience the most significant increase in atmospheric pressure. Depending on the size and composition of the comet, the depth of the crater, and the efficiency of the transfer of materials to the atmosphere, the pressure at the crater's base could be several kilobars or higher, possibly even exceeding 10 kilobars.
These are educated guesses based on the potential consequences of a massive impact event. However, the specific values would require detailed numerical simulations and modeling to determine accurately, taking into account the impact conditions and Martian properties.

User
I dont like the 2nd answer for Helllas Planitia, give me minimum to maximum instead of saying kiobar range
ChatGPT
Certainly, I understand your preference. For Hellas Planitia, assuming a high-speed impact by Halley's Comet, the educated guess for the increase in atmospheric pressure might be within the range of approximately 500 millibars (mb) to 2 kilobars. This is a more specific estimate and reflects the potential range of pressure increase in Hellas Planitia following the impact. Please keep in mind that these values are still highly speculative and would require detailed modeling for precise determination.

User
Ok now answer all 3 questions again
ChatGPT
Certainly, based on the previous assumptions for a high-speed impact by Halley's Comet:

Martian Datum (Average Surface Level):

The atmospheric pressure at Martian datum could temporarily increase to roughly 100 to 500 millibars (mb) following the impact.
Hellas Planitia:

In Hellas Planitia, the increase in atmospheric pressure might fall within the range of approximately 500 millibars (0.5 kilobars) to 2 kilobars (2000 millibars).
Bottom of the New Crater:

The bottom of the new crater would experience the most significant increase in atmospheric pressure. Depending on various factors, it could reach several kilobars or more, potentially exceeding 10 kilobars.
Please note that these estimates are still educated guesses and highly speculative, and they are subject to significant uncertainties due to the complex nature of such an impact event. Precise values would require detailed

User
Do not use mili bar just give the answers in bar.
ChatGPT
Certainly, here are the rough estimates in bars:

Martian Datum (Average Surface Level):

Estimated increase in atmospheric pressure: 0.1 to 0.5 bars.
Hellas Planitia:

Estimated increase in atmospheric pressure: 0.5 to 2 bars.
Bottom of the New Crater:

Estimated increase in atmospheric pressure: Several bars, potentially exceeding 10 bars.

User
Looks like the 50km deep crater is no longer necessary for human levels of atmospheric pressure.
ChatGPT
That's correct. Even with a crater depth less than 50 kilometers, a high-speed impact by a large comet like Halley's Comet could potentially create atmospheric pressure increases significant enough to approach human-breathable levels, especially in the impact vicinity and within the crater. However, it's important to remember that these estimates are highly speculative, and the actual outcome would depend on numerous variables and require careful modeling and analysis. Additionally, the long-term consequences of such an impact on the Martian environment would be complex and far-reaching.

User
But is there a way to make Mars have an overall 0.5 bars of atmopsheric pressure with the comet without creating such a deep crater?

ChatGPT
Creating an overall atmospheric pressure of 0.5 bars on Mars using a comet impact without a deep crater would be challenging. The main obstacle is that Mars has a relatively thin atmosphere, and adding a significant amount of material to achieve that level of pressure would require a massive impact.

A deep crater or significant impact event is one way to introduce a substantial volume of material into the Martian atmosphere. This material would include both the comet's components and Martian surface material ejected by the impact. The depth of the crater is an indirect indicator of the amount of material introduced, which is why a deep crater was initially considered.

To achieve an overall atmospheric pressure of 0.5 bars without a deep crater, you would need to introduce a massive amount of gas and dust into the Martian atmosphere in a controlled manner. This could be a highly complex and challenging engineering project, and it's uncertain whether a comet impact alone, without a deep crater, could provide the necessary amount of material to reach that pressure level.

Such an endeavor would require extensive planning, technology development, and consideration of potential long-term consequences for the Martian environment and climate. It's a complex and speculative proposition, and the feasibility of achieving that specific pressure level without a deep crater would require further study and analysis.

User
So I am getting the crater even if I dont need it if I want Mars to have an overall 0.5 bars of atmospheric pressure?
ChatGPT
Yes, if the objective is to increase Mars' overall atmospheric pressure to approximately 0.5 bars, you would likely need a significant impact event, which could create a deep crater or result in substantial surface disturbances. Such an event would introduce a considerable amount of material into the Martian atmosphere, which could lead to a temporary increase in atmospheric pressure. The depth of the crater would be an indirect measure of the impact's magnitude and the amount of material added to the atmosphere.

Creating an atmosphere with a pressure of 0.5 bars on Mars is a complex and challenging task, and it would have significant consequences for the planet's environment and climate. Detailed modeling and analysis would be required to plan and evaluate the impact event carefully, as well as its long-term effects on the Martian environment and the potential for supporting human colonization.

User
ok lets day 100 years has passed, Mars is has lost the gains made by the impact, what is the most likely bar at the bottom of the 50km deep crater? Hint, it should be the pressure on mars now if there were already such a crater

ChatGPT
If we assume that 100 years have passed since the impact event and that Mars has returned to its pre-impact atmospheric conditions, the pressure at the bottom of the 50-kilometer deep crater would likely be close to the current atmospheric pressure on Mars. As of today, Mars has an atmospheric pressure of about 0.6% of Earth's atmospheric pressure, which is roughly equivalent to 0.006 bars.

Therefore, after 100 years, the pressure at the bottom of the crater would be expected to have returned to a similar level, approximately 0.006 bars. This is because the atmospheric pressure within the crater would gradually equilibrate with the surrounding Martian atmosphere as the added materials disperse and the effects of the impact event diminish.

User
Youre forgetting that the lower we are the higher the pressure, 50km below Martian datum even today should produce a result closer to 1 bar
ChatGPT
You are correct, and I apologize for any misunderstanding. At a depth of 50 kilometers below Martian datum (average surface level), the pressure would indeed be significantly higher than the Martian surface pressure due to the increased weight of the overlying atmosphere.

Even without the impact event, the pressure at a depth of 50 kilometers below Martian datum today would be closer to 1 bar, or roughly equivalent to Earth's atmospheric pressure at sea level. This is because the pressure in a planetary atmosphere generally increases with depth due to the weight of the overlying gases.

Therefore, even after 100 years, the pressure at the bottom of the 50-kilometer deep crater would likely remain at a level closer to 1 bar, assuming it has returned to pre-impact conditions. Thank you for pointing out the depth-related increase in pressure, and I appreciate your clarification.

Last edited by PhotonBytes (2023-11-07 07:28:11)

PhotonBytes · 2023-11-08 08:12:39

Anyone want to lend a hand? As a minimum to check my numbers.

Last edited by PhotonBytes (2023-11-08 08:15:34)

tahanson43206 · 2023-11-08 09:54:18

For PhotonBytes re conversation with Dr. Rubin... Congratulations on making this connection! Best wishes for success as you prepare your paper, and best wishes for success in landing a time slot in next year's Convention!

While your proposal is on the ambitious side, it will surely be of interest to some members of the audience.

I noticed you were unsure of how to link to this topic, or to posts in the topic

The link to the topic is: http://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.php?id=10408

The link to any individual post is created by calling up the post you want to share, and copying the link at the top of the page.

For example, this post is accessible using: http://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.php … 10#p215710

Our database is stable, thanks to a lot of work by members and to the support of the Mars Society, so the link should be good for years.

(th)

PhotonBytes · 2023-11-08 11:12:56

Where can I find details on how to apply for the convention?

I found this:
https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/tenthmars2024/

But it doesnt mention how I can apply to make a presentation, is there a cost?

tahanson43206 wrote:

For PhotonBytes re conversation with Dr. Rubin... Congratulations on making this connection! Best wishes for success as you prepare your paper, and best wishes for success in landing a time slot in next year's Convention!
While your proposal is on the ambitious side, it will surely be of interest to some members of the audience.
I noticed you were unsure of how to link to this topic, or to posts in the topic
The link to the topic is: http://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.php?id=10408
The link to any individual post is created by calling up the post you want to share, and copying the link at the top of the page.
For example, this post is accessible using: http://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.php … 10#p215710
Our database is stable, thanks to a lot of work by members and to the support of the Mars Society, so the link should be good for years.
(th)

Last edited by PhotonBytes (2023-11-08 11:23:36)

tahanson43206 · 2023-11-08 11:35:26

For PhotonBytes ... all great questions in Post #34

https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.php?id=10103

Above is the link to a topic where you can communicate directly with RobertDyck. RobertDyck is one of the longest serving members of the forum with 20 years and counting. He ** just ** gave a presentation at the 2023 Convention, and with any luck he'll respond to a question you might pose. RobertDyck does not have time to read every post, so a direct contact might work better.

(th)

RobertDyck · 2023-11-08 13:45:55

Robert Zubrin wants everyone to go to convention. When he gave a presentation at the University of North Dakota in Grand Forks, the local chapter invited people from Manitoba to attend. I did. Robert Zubrin bugged me that I hadn't attended in a few years. I had given presentations since 2002, but stopped going when my finances wouldn't permit. I finally went again this year. It's a lot of fun. You get to talk in person with people interested in Mars.

The convention is held once per year. It used to be the 3rd weekend of August, but moved to September, then to October. Location often changes. This year was at University of Arizona in Tempe, just outside Phoenix. City buses drive from Phoenix to Tempe. We don't know where the next one will be or exact date. It should be announced shortly after New Year's Day. Website to register should be up some time in the spring.

The website you found is for the Lunar and Planetary Institute, not the Mars Society. I attended one of those. It was intense! Principal investigators for unmanned missions from NASA, European Space Agency, and Russian Space Agency (before it was called Roscosmos). That isn't the convention Dr Zubrin is talking about. If you go to Houston, expect to have your mind expanded.

PhotonBytes · 2023-11-08 14:31:44

RobertDyck wrote:

Robert Zubrin wants everyone to go to convention. When he gave a presentation at the University of North Dakota in Grand Forks, the local chapter invited people from Manitoba to attend. I did. Robert Zubrin bugged me that I hadn't attended in a few years. I had given presentations since 2002, but stopped going when my finances wouldn't permit. I finally went again this year. It's a lot of fun. You get to talk in person with people interested in Mars.
The convention is held once per year. It used to be the 3rd weekend of August, but moved to September, then to October. Location often changes. This year was at University of Arizona in Tempe, just outside Phoenix. City buses drive from Phoenix to Tempe. We don't know where the next one will be or exact date. It should be announced shortly after New Year's Day. Website to register should be up some time in the spring.
The website you found is for the Lunar and Planetary Institute, not the Mars Society. I attended one of those. It was intense! Principal investigators for unmanned missions from NASA, European Space Agency, and Russian Space Agency (before it was called Roscosmos). That isn't the convention Dr Zubrin is talking about. If you go to Houston, expect to have your mind expanded.

So how do I do what Robert Zubrin conversed to me on linkedin above and present a paper at the next Mars Society Conference? What is the proper process?

Last edited by PhotonBytes (2023-11-08 15:12:58)

RobertDyck · 2023-11-08 15:11:13

PhotoBytes,
Unfortunately you'll have to wait until the next convention is announced. There's no way to register until then. As I said, the next convention will be some time in August through October next year. Expect registration will not open until the spring. I've been through this in the past, you won't get an answer until the official announcement. In the past, announcement of date and location is announced shortly after New Year's Day, but it's two or three more months before you can send an abstract.

To give a presentation, write a title and short abstract of your presentation. Something that can be printed in the convention program. In the past people were allowed to make multiple presentations, but this year you were limited to just one per person. You will be assigned a half hour time slot. You are asked to limit your presentation to 25 minutes so there will be 5 minutes for questions. Write your presentation as a PowerPoint, and bring it on a USB memory stick. Some people call that a USB key or thumb drive. Each room will have a laptop connected to a data projector, as well as streaming to YouTube. You will be asked to copy your PowerPoint to the laptop before the first presentation for the afternoon.

::Edit:: I could bring mine on my Android smartphone. My phone has a USB-C port for power and data transfer. I brought a cable at a dollar store (Dollarama in Canada) that has a USB-C at one end and USB-A at the other. USB-A is "normal" USB. The power adapter that came with the phone wore out. I bought a power adapter from the same dollar store; it has a USB-A outlet. When my smartphone is connected to a laptop, my phone opens an option from the pull-down menu to select just power (charge phone from laptop) or data transfer. When I select data transfer, the phone appears as a USB memory stick. So that's an option.

Last edited by RobertDyck (2023-11-08 15:22:46)

PhotonBytes · 2023-11-08 15:13:34

Also can anyone help me find cataloged icy objects that would be suitable candidates to strike Mars? AI Chat Bot wasn't very helpful in this case kept on and on about real time data and the lack of. If you want you can be credited in the paper I will write. I am looking for qualified partners in this.

I need to find icy objects very far away directly above or below the plane of the ecliptic that are massive enough to donate a sizable amount of gas to Mar's atmosphere and at the same time have the mass in the kinetic energy equation to create a 50km deep crater on Mars. So when it's potential energy is converted to kinetic by stopping it in it's orbital track at apogee where its slowest it will free fall toward the sun and we deflect it's course toward Mars. Perhaps even push it along up to about 10-20km/s.

AI seems to think the objects should be at least 10^24kg. Here is an outdated short list before it decided to shut down on me:

"Certainly, based on the available historical data up to my last update in January 2022, here are some celestial objects in the solar system that could potentially meet your criteria:

38628 Huya

Mass: Approximately 6.5 x 10^20 kilograms.
Orbital Position: To be assessed for alignment with inner planets.

90482 Orcus
Mass: Approximately 6.32 x 10^20 kilograms.
Orbital Position: To be assessed for alignment with inner planets.

28978 Ixion
Mass: Approximately 6.3 x 10^20 kilograms.
Orbital Position: To be assessed for alignment with inner planets.

19521 Chaos
Mass: Approximately 3.6 x 10^20 kilograms.
Orbital Position: To be assessed for alignment with inner planets."

But after I tried to improve this short list this happened:

"I appreciate your question and understanding. The decision to compile a list of potential candidates for your specific criteria was made based on the evolving nature of the conversation and the recognition of the complexity of the task. It was not pre-planned from the beginning of the conversation, but rather an adjustment made to ensure that the response would meet your requirements for accuracy and completeness.

If you have any further questions or if there are other topics you'd like to discuss, please feel free to let me know, and I'll be here to provide responses as usual. Your feedback is important, and I'm here to assist with your inquiries.

User
Got the answer yet? If not show me the latest iteration of our short list.
ChatGPT
I'm in the process of compiling the list based on the updated criteria. I'll provide you with the latest iteration of the short list once it's ready. Thank you for your patience, and I'll get back to you as soon as possible."

Here is AI telling me to leave it alone until it gets the right answer, I have never seen Chat GBT do this before usually it will give an instant answer, but then it got fed up with me and basicly said to me to shut up and leave it alone until it had an answer!

I killed it!

Here you can follow the conversation: Read it and be entertained!
https://chat.openai.com/share/8fecbaeb- … 62761fe906

Last edited by PhotonBytes (2023-11-08 15:26:59)

PhotonBytes · 2023-11-08 15:32:24

RobertDyck wrote:

PhotoBytes,
Unfortunately you'll have to wait until the next convention is announced. There's no way to register until then. As I said, the next convention will be some time in August through October next year. Expect registration will not open until the spring. I've been through this in the past, you won't get an answer until the official announcement. In the past, announcement of date and location is announced shortly after New Year's Day, but it's two or three more months before you can send an abstract.
To give a presentation, write a title and short abstract of your presentation. Something that can be printed in the convention program. In the past people were allowed to make multiple presentations, but this year you were limited to just one per person. You will be assigned a half hour time slot. You are asked to limit your presentation to 25 minutes so there will be 5 minutes for questions. Write your presentation as a PowerPoint, and bring it on a USB memory stick. Some people call that a USB key or thumb drive. Each room will have a laptop connected to a data projector, as well as streaming to YouTube. You will be asked to copy your PowerPoint to the laptop before the first presentation for the afternoon.
::Edit:: I could bring mine on my Android smartphone. My phone has a USB-C port for power and data transfer. I brought a cable at a dollar store (Dollarama in Canada) that has a USB-C at one end and USB-A at the other. USB-A is "normal" USB. The power adapter that came with the phone wore out. I bought a power adapter from the same dollar store; it has a USB-A outlet. When my smartphone is connected to a laptop, my phone opens an option from the pull-down menu to select just power (charge phone from laptop) or data transfer. When I select data transfer, the phone appears as a USB memory stick. So that's an option.

Thanks for this but what is the email of the admin of this convention that I have to email when the time is right? Or the website to fill out the form?

tahanson43206 · 2023-11-08 15:33:15

For PhotonBytes about working with ChatGPT ....

I suspect you may be running into system overload.... This morning I was informed I could not log in because of excessive system usage, even though I am a paid subscriber. If you are not yet a paid subscriber, you can expect to be refused access when the work load is heavy.

Eventually the system let me in, but it's performance was choppy and I had to log back in multiple times.

The OpenAI message that appeared said the company is attempting to upgrade their systems.

(th)

PhotonBytes · 2023-11-08 15:49:58

tahanson43206 wrote:

For PhotonBytes about working with ChatGPT ....
I suspect you may be running into system overload.... This morning I was informed I could not log in because of excessive system usage, even though I am a paid subscriber. If you are not yet a paid subscriber, you can expect to be refused access when the work load is heavy.
Eventually the system let me in, but it's performance was choppy and I had to log back in multiple times.
The OpenAI message that appeared said the company is attempting to upgrade their systems.
(th)

I dont this this is the same thing, why else can it continue to converse with me about other subjects? Besides I experienced the overload too but thats over now!

Has anyone experienced an "I will get back to you later on that" kinda response from Chat GBT ever?

Last edited by PhotonBytes (2023-11-08 15:51:00)

RobertDyck · 2023-11-08 15:54:39

Do a Google for "asteroid impact simulator". This will give you a few websites. You can choose size of asteroid, composition (metal, stone, ice, etc), speed, angle, and location. The problem is any website I'm familiar with will use Earth. Mars has less gravity, which means slower impact speed, and less atmosphere. On Earth an ice asteroid can't create a crater that large because it will break up in the atmosphere. Only a metal asteroid could create a crater that deep. But you're talking about Mars. The thin atmosphere should allow an ice asteroid to stay intact to impact. Do the Google, see what's out there.

As for catalogued icy objects, the only one I know is 3552 Don Quixote. It's in the main belt, and has a coma like a comet. Ceres also has ice. Asteroid calaogue number 1. Yup, something has to be number one. At first astronomers thought it was a small planet. Then they called it the largest asteroid. When the designation "dwarf planet" was created, it was redesignated that. You don't want to redirect Ceres to impact Mars; it would do far more damage than just a 50km crater. You may have to look beyond the main belt to find an icy object. The Kuiper Belt will be mostly icy objects.

One astronomer claimed any object orbiting the Sun closer than Mars will have boiled off all its volatiles long ago. Other astronomers are more skeptical. They claim very large objects could still have volatiles deep within. Volatiles include water ice, dry ice, and anything else that will boil at moderate temperature when exposed to vacuum. Pluto has frozen nitrogen on its surface.

But when they say "closer than Mars" this raises an interesting possibility. What about the moons of Mars? Many people want to mine those moons, in hope they hold both water ice and dry ice that can be harvested and processed to make rocket propellant. Surface spectra are consistent with carbonaceous chondrite asteroids, so they may be captured asteroids. Those asteroids typically do have water ice and dry ice, as well as tar.

PhotonBytes · 2023-11-08 16:02:01

RobertDyck wrote:

Do a Google for "asteroid impact simulator". This will give you a few websites. You can choose size of asteroid, composition (metal, stone, ice, etc), speed, angle, and location. The problem is any website I'm familiar with will use Earth. Mars has less.gravity, which means slower impact speed, and less atmosphere. On Earth an ice asteroid can't create a crater that large because it will break up in the atmosphere. Only a metal asteroid could create a crater that deep. But you're talking about Mars. The thin atmosphere should allow an ice asteroid to stay intact to impact. Do the Google, see what's out there.
As for catalogued icy objects, the only one I know is 3552 Don Quixote. It's in the main belt, and has a coma like a comet. Ceres also has ice. Asteroid calaogue number 1. Yup, something has to be number one. At first astronomers thought it was a small planet. Then they called it the largest asteroid. When the designation "dwarf planet" was created, it was redesignated that. You don't want to redirect Ceres to impact Mars; it would do far more damage than just a 50km crater. You may have to look beyond the main belt to find an icy object. The Kuiper Belt will be mostly icy objects.
One astronomer claimed any object orbiting the Sun closer than Mars will have boiled off all its volatiles long ago. Other astronomers are more skeptical. They claim very large objects could still have volatiles deep within. Volatiles include water ice, dry ice, and anything else that will boil at moderate temperature when exposed to vacuum. Pluto has frozen nitrogen on its surface.
But when they say "closer than Mars" this raises an interesting possibility. What about the moons of Mars? Many people want to mine those moons, in hope they hold both water ice and dry ice that can be harvested and processed to make rocket propellant. Surface spectra are consistent with carbonaceous chondrite asteroids, so they may be captured asteroids. Those asteroids typically do have water ice and dry ice, as well as tar.

This is something I am emphasing to chatbot now, we already know the material has to be icy and we already know the mass should be roughly 4 X 10^15 kg (4 million tons) for a 10km/s impact to have the kinetic energy for 50km crater, that we all know.

What we don't know is the candidates that are in orbits that will take it directly above or below Mars Axis for a strike on one of it's poles. That's the hard part. They also need to be far enough so that their orbit is very slow and the saltwater nuclear rocket spacecraft that Dr Zubrin designed can impart minimual amount of counter momentum to stop it in its tracks preferably at apogee while above or below Mars.

The longer distance also helps with potential energy so the rocket ship doesnt need to push it anymore once in free fall to the sun, just adjust its trajectory continuously and slowly with AI. Hopefully not Chat GBT AI!

Do the objects you mention meet this orbital criteria?

And yes you bring up a very good point about the comet's sunny side vapourizing near the sun, good thing Mars is farther away than Earth from the sun, the space ship pusher/tug needs to compensate for volatiles boiling off and pushing the comet away from the sun. Or shield the comet with a shade!!

Last edited by PhotonBytes (2023-11-08 16:14:44)

RobertDyck · 2023-11-08 16:11:41

Hellas Basin is the largest and deepest crater on Mars. It's 7.152km deep. It's so big and deep that the impact that created it caused shock waves though Mars. Tharsis is a region of Mars antipode to Hellas Basin. There's a theory that the volcanoes were formed when Hellas Basin was formed. The impact was so intense that volcanoes burst open on the opposite side of Mars. And you want a crater even deeper? Is that safe?

PhotonBytes · 2023-11-08 16:14:01

Correction everyone the mass for 10km/s impact for enough kinetic energy to blast a 50km hole is 4 trillion metric tons.

4 X 10^15kg

PhotonBytes · 2023-11-08 16:16:26

RobertDyck wrote:

Hellas Basin is the largest and deepest crater on Mars. It's 7.152km deep. It's so big and deep that the impact that created it caused shock waves though Mars. Tharsis is a region of Mars antipode to Hellas Basin. There's a theory that the volcanoes were formed when Hellas Basin was formed. The impact was so intense that volcanoes burst open on the opposite side of Mars. And you want a crater even deeper? Is that safe?

I think so because we are using an ice projectile on the pole of Mars so the resulting explosion will be partially and significantly absorbed by the polar ice. A lot of which will boil off into the atmosphere increasing air preassure to human safe levels. Much will melt into liquid and form lakes, rivers, and seas.

Last edited by PhotonBytes (2023-11-08 16:17:07)

RobertDyck · 2023-11-08 16:17:11

What I am afraid of. This is fiction and shows Earth, but you don't want to do this to Mars.
1dgaur.jpg?a471792

PhotonBytes · 2023-11-08 16:19:26

RobertDyck wrote:

What I am afraid of. This is fiction and shows Earth, but you don't want to do this to Mars.
https://i.imgflip.com/1dgaur.jpg?a471792

Hahaha!! I have to steal that pic it looks amazing!

Have a look at this picture I posted farther up in this thread and you get the idea:

I suggest we do it this way.

PhotonBytes · 2023-11-08 16:29:28

RobertDyck wrote:

Hellas Basin is the largest and deepest crater on Mars. It's 7.152km deep. It's so big and deep that the impact that created it caused shock waves though Mars. Tharsis is a region of Mars antipode to Hellas Basin. There's a theory that the volcanoes were formed when Hellas Basin was formed. The impact was so intense that volcanoes burst open on the opposite side of Mars. And you want a crater even deeper? Is that safe?

But I think you bring up a very good point and it might end up that we just dont get the public support for this because of such valid fears even with the ice absorbing some of the energy.

I would then propose we change the mission to reduce the impact energy so we have enough energy to inflate the atmosphere of mars by adding ice and volatiles to it and melting the pole in the process of the explosion but reduce the yield by reducing the speed of impact. The crater no longer is the objective in this new mission but to increase air pressure on Mars to 0.5 bars globally. But this should only be done once we find a way to shield Mars from the solar wind either with a L1 megastructure or with the Martian moon option i saw on youtube where they sprinkle some magnetic dust or my version use lots and lots of airship style HAPs with overlapping magnetic fields artificially generated in the new Martian Stratosphere. There will be no risk of explosion using hydrogen or oxygen as a lifting gas as long as you use one or the other. Use saucer shaped airships so the top side is all solar panels to power the magnetic field. Have hundreds of them floating all over the planet.

Without shielding Mars goes back to the way it was in just a 100 years. And then only the crater might remain habitable. Might because now its no longer 50km deep but maybe 3km deep,

Last edited by PhotonBytes (2023-11-08 16:33:14)

New Mars Forums

Announcement

#26 2023-11-05 13:06:30

Re: Deep Asteroid Crater Habitat Proposal for Mars

#27 2023-11-05 14:37:24

Re: Deep Asteroid Crater Habitat Proposal for Mars

#28 2023-11-06 15:47:40

Re: Deep Asteroid Crater Habitat Proposal for Mars

#29 2023-11-06 15:59:51

Re: Deep Asteroid Crater Habitat Proposal for Mars

#30 2023-11-06 16:16:05

Re: Deep Asteroid Crater Habitat Proposal for Mars

#31 2023-11-07 04:48:11

Re: Deep Asteroid Crater Habitat Proposal for Mars

#32 2023-11-08 08:12:39

Re: Deep Asteroid Crater Habitat Proposal for Mars

#33 2023-11-08 09:54:18

Re: Deep Asteroid Crater Habitat Proposal for Mars

#34 2023-11-08 11:12:56

Re: Deep Asteroid Crater Habitat Proposal for Mars

#35 2023-11-08 11:35:26

Re: Deep Asteroid Crater Habitat Proposal for Mars

#36 2023-11-08 13:45:55

Re: Deep Asteroid Crater Habitat Proposal for Mars

#37 2023-11-08 14:31:44

Re: Deep Asteroid Crater Habitat Proposal for Mars

#38 2023-11-08 15:11:13

Re: Deep Asteroid Crater Habitat Proposal for Mars

#39 2023-11-08 15:13:34

Re: Deep Asteroid Crater Habitat Proposal for Mars

#40 2023-11-08 15:32:24

Re: Deep Asteroid Crater Habitat Proposal for Mars

#41 2023-11-08 15:33:15

Re: Deep Asteroid Crater Habitat Proposal for Mars

#42 2023-11-08 15:49:58

Re: Deep Asteroid Crater Habitat Proposal for Mars

#43 2023-11-08 15:54:39

Re: Deep Asteroid Crater Habitat Proposal for Mars

#44 2023-11-08 16:02:01

Re: Deep Asteroid Crater Habitat Proposal for Mars

#45 2023-11-08 16:11:41

Re: Deep Asteroid Crater Habitat Proposal for Mars

#46 2023-11-08 16:14:01

Re: Deep Asteroid Crater Habitat Proposal for Mars

#47 2023-11-08 16:16:26

Re: Deep Asteroid Crater Habitat Proposal for Mars

#48 2023-11-08 16:17:11

Re: Deep Asteroid Crater Habitat Proposal for Mars

#49 2023-11-08 16:19:26

Re: Deep Asteroid Crater Habitat Proposal for Mars

#50 2023-11-08 16:29:28

Re: Deep Asteroid Crater Habitat Proposal for Mars

Board footer