New Mars Forums

Official discussion forum of The Mars Society and MarsNews.com

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Announcement: This forum is accepting new registrations via email. Please see Recruiting Topic for additional information. Write newmarsmember[at_symbol]gmail.com.
  1. Index
  2. » Search
  3. » Posts by JoshNH4H

#2401 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Un- conventional ways to LEO » 2007-12-31 11:46:58

Your "idea" is completely ridiculous.  Balloons are unreliable, low powered, expensive, flammable, and completely pointless. You're trying (and failing) to solve the dilemma of the 21st century with technology from the 18th.  Youve seen the balloon size for JP aerospace, it's simply not equipped for mass transport.  yes, basically the prime advantage of LEO over suborbit is that you can stay there.  But think of what comes with that, good space stations, power generation, communications satellites.  A whole economy that cannot be done in suborbit.  This idea is completely unfeasible and pointless. 

As a final note, this is NewMARS, not NewSUBORBIT

#2402 Re: Science, Technology, and Astronomy » Toshiba Builds 100x Smaller Micro Nuclear Reactor » 2007-12-31 11:14:35

but now, does it need any inputs but light from the sun? NO

It is theoretically possible to make it so that a rotating space station can have a biosphere that needs a negligible amount of input to sustain its biosphere.  This is what an outpost/base/colony of any size will need.

#2403 Re: Science, Technology, and Astronomy » Toshiba Builds 100x Smaller Micro Nuclear Reactor » 2007-12-31 10:30:02

Open loop refers to the biosphere, not the materials needs.  It is possible to go very, very close to closed loop, while the ISS in not now, nor will it ever, be anywhere approaching closed loop.

#2404 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Un- conventional ways to LEO » 2007-12-31 10:00:39

And you plucked those figures from which thin air? Wikipedia?

Firstly, wikipedia is very reliable.

Secondly, no, those are my own guesses.  However, I used them to illustrate that the only use for suborbit is quicker plane services.  Let me straiten something out for you:  If you were on a non-mooving pskyscraper 300 km tall, there would be about .95 g.  Suborbit is just like the vomit comet.  It has its applications, but very few of them.

#2405 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Un- conventional ways to LEO » 2007-12-30 19:00:24

yes, it can.  but only it.  Face it- the applications of suborbit are 1/100 the applications of LEO (which, in turn, is 1/10 that of the moon, which is 1/10 that of mars)

#2406 Re: Interplanetary transportation » You're all to Mars-centered!!!!!! » 2007-12-30 19:00:09

ace it- the applications of suborbit are 1/100 the applications of LEO (which, in turn, is 1/10 that of the moon, which is 1/10 that of mars)

Mars is The Object.  Other than Mars, the rest of the solar system is just one big mine.  Only Earth and Mars, Terraformed or not, can be a Home.  The moon will, in all probability, end up a no-man's land of mining towns and a few (seperate) tourist locations, which are generally circumvented because of the eventually created tourist resorts in closer GEO.   The current plan sees flags and footsteps around 2040.  With your plan, the first person there will be some greedy capitalist, somewhere in the neighborhood of 2150, there to bring the kind of chaos that the 'metanats' in RGB mars heft upon the martians. 

Do you really want that?





_____

#2407 Re: Meta New Mars » Spammer » 2007-12-30 17:09:12

Really, what's up with all of the completely unused members.  Over 1/3 (13/33 pages of users) has no posts.

#2408 Re: Science, Technology, and Astronomy » Toshiba Builds 100x Smaller Micro Nuclear Reactor » 2007-12-30 16:59:38

that's the name for a life support system that need outside materials.  Ex. Earth= Closed loop life support system.  ISS= open loop (needs air, water, food brought up, waste brought down.)

#2409 Re: Science, Technology, and Astronomy » 3 ideas. » 2007-12-30 16:57:02

still, that makes the official starting date for mars 6/13/1975.  (I'm assuming 12:00 midnight. it probably wasn't, but that's definitely close enough.  Could someone help me write a program to show the MTime, like the things you can put on the bottom of webpages. (in flash, java, C, etc.)

#2410 Re: Science, Technology, and Astronomy » Toshiba Builds 100x Smaller Micro Nuclear Reactor » 2007-12-30 09:18:51

Terraformer, you like the iss, don't you.  THE ISS IS A DEAD END.  It has an open loop life support system, it's orbit will decay in a matter of years, it's ineffficient, in an unhealthy environment, and is much too expensive.

#2411 Re: Science, Technology, and Astronomy » 3 ideas. » 2007-12-30 09:16:34

ok, since the russian probe died, I'm sttill going w/ the viking landers.  How could I calculate the perihelion before they landed?

#2412 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Un- conventional ways to LEO » 2007-12-30 09:14:50

but then the station needs to boost to regain the velocity it lost by speeding the rocket up.  Balloons are only helpful in suborbit applications.

#2413 Re: Science, Technology, and Astronomy » gaetanomarano's opinions on space exploration » 2007-12-29 21:10:20

because he keep s posting similar things over and over, I made this thread for him.  Please post your opinions on problems with the space programs here.

#2414 Re: Interplanetary transportation » >>> Why the 5-segments SRB is a NONSENSE >>> » 2007-12-29 21:08:34

gaetanomarano, these persistent and blatant promotions of your website have now reached the level of spam. Furthermore, creating a new topic for this purpose is unacceptable. If you have something specific to say, say it in an appropriate topic. Please remove your message

I am going to create a thread for you in science and technology.  It will be called 'gaetanomarano's opinions on space exploration'.  Please post things like this there.

#2415 Re: Meta New Mars » 99999 messages posted!! » 2007-12-29 19:52:03

Our users have posted a total of 102750 articles
We have 1620 registered users
The newest registered user is Skamp_X

so that means 'only' 7350 messages to 111,111! 
Let's keep going. (#'s include this post.)

BTW, has anyone noticed that ATM, % of total posts fir any given user is roughly post #/1000

I'll try to put a countdown here every few months or so.

#2416 Re: Science, Technology, and Astronomy » 3 ideas. » 2007-12-29 19:42:42

About the Weitian calendar (see link at top)  What was the martian perihelion directly before the viking probes landed?  The viking probes were the first things to land on mars, right?

#2417 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Un- conventional ways to LEO » 2007-12-29 11:28:05

but just b/c you're in space doesn't mean that you're in orbit.  the redstone rocket went into space, but was only traveling at mach 10, while orbit is 25.

#2418 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Un- conventional ways to LEO » 2007-12-28 15:12:26

I have pressure on air density above.  about 1-2 km/s are lost to drag in a craft launching from earth.  Launching from balloons to remove this is somewhat silly, as if you go too high, the balloons become too big to be economical

#2419 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Un- conventional ways to LEO » 2007-12-28 08:28:08

What about giving it some added velocity by something cannon like at ground level.  Very jules verne, but still somewhat feasible.  nothing huge, maybe a ton of TNT (is that a lot? I dont know)  As it's not on the rocket, the rocket equation doesn't apply.

#2420 Re: Human missions » Space stations beyond ISS » 2007-12-25 07:28:18

Not to mention that, as  you have stated multiple times, this is an excercize in minimalization.  As such, smallest gee is lower cost, not to mention, you could make the station wider.  this gives more space to grow the food, which you have explained, is the chokepoint.  BTW, where did you get your figures for the amt. of m^2 /person (foodwise)

#2421 Re: Human missions » Space stations beyond ISS » 2007-12-24 19:27:50

also, lighter gravity would allow lighter materials.  Remember that the hull materials need to go from (presumably) ~650 mb to 0 mb, and support their own weight.

#2422 Re: Human missions » Space stations beyond ISS » 2007-12-24 15:34:21

acce4pting premise 2, wouldn't say, 1/2 g, or mars g be better?

#2423 Re: Intelligent Alien Life » Important Discovery! » 2007-12-23 15:34:34

See my userpage (http://www.newmars.com/wiki/index.php/User:Jumpboy11j) for the ones i've had, as well as my post history.  I'm currently working on a getting to mars mor efficiently by slingshoting around the moon.

If nasa, or anyone else conclusively proves that there is intelligent life on mars, I would like to think that I would believe them.  However, I think you may just be over-editing the images.

#2424 Re: Meta New Mars » Spammer » 2007-12-22 13:22:34

We're pretty busy guys. sad

I'm trying to be around often but it's physically impossible (sporadic internet access). I'd appoint more moderators but I gotta get the trust issue down first. Every time I appoint new moderators it's people I know well.

,

I would be glad to become a mod for Newmars

And maybe some sort of 'spammer vote' for the user's first 15 posts or so, like on their post, a mini poll saying 'mark this post as spam', and if it is, people camn vote, more than x number of votes and you (josh) get an e-mail?

#2425 Re: Intelligent Alien Life » Important Discovery! » 2007-12-22 13:13:56

An honest answer to your question is that I don't think members of this forum are particularly interested in what I have discovered otherwise there would have been more discussion and interest shown in the post.

If no one here is interested,  why bother posting it?

However, it can be guaranteed that if I was a high-flying Astrophysicist, Astronomer or well-known scientific author posting here and had made the same claim, there is no doubt that the discovery and subsequent claim would have received a great deal more attention. But this is not the point in question!

most people, even famous people, who " discover" life on mars are laughed out of the waters

What I feel is important is the high degree of in-depth visual research achieved and the many hours  I have spent examining a vast array of photographic and documentary eveidence. The image processing technique I use has definitely identified that there is a a multitude of rectilinear structures on the surface. This is evidence in itself and validates that the structures could only have been erected by an intelligent species that currently exists on the planet. I suspect the species is human-like in appearance and this claim will probably be validated in the due course of time. When this happens you will know whether or not I was correct in my current assertion.

if (NOT when) it is validated, I will believe you.  Not before.

There are many people posting on forums and the Internet who have laid claim to discovering this, that and the other, but nothing that relates to what is currently happening on the planet. Millions of structures means miliions of inhabitants. This evidence alone shows that the inhabitants must have a reasonable level of oxygen in the atmosphere and the most valuable commodity of all - water!

you've just said it yourself, many people have claims.  What makes yours different?

And BTW, the image you posted here is not the same image as the one referred to at the top of this thread. You also failed to include the credit to the image you imported - namely NASA/JPL/MSSS.

Sorry about that.  But I don't believe you.  But at least you're not like that Lschl13 person who trolls this website.[/i]

  1. Index
  2. » Search
  3. » Posts by JoshNH4H

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB