You are not logged in.
AI Overview
For the flow of air exiting a pipe, the updraft velocity is a function of the thermal energy input (heat) and is described by the principles of the stack effect. In this phenomenon, heated air is less dense and creates a pressure difference that drives the flow.The updraft equation links the thermal energy, which is characterized by the temperature difference, to the resulting mass flow rate. Stack effect equation for flow rate The stack effect equation is a practical model for calculating the flow rate Q generated by a temperature differential. Q=C_{d}A\sqrt{2gH\frac{T_{i}-T_{o}}{T_{i}}}
where:
Q = flow rate typically in cubic feet per minute or m^{3}/s
C_{d} = discharge coefficient (for a smooth pipe opening, usually 0.65 to 0.70
A = cross-sectional area of the pipe m^{2}
g = gravitational acceleration 9.81\,m/s^{2}H = effective height of the pipe mT_{i} = average indoor or internal temperature (Kelvin)T_{o} = outdoor or external temperature (Kelvin)
This equation can be simplified for an enclosed pipe with a known height and a large opening.
It shows that flow rate is directly proportional to the square root of the temperature difference, T_{i}-T_{o}.
Relating thermal energy input to temperature change
The thermal energy input is related to the change in the air's internal temperature by the fundamental heat transfer equation: q=\.{m}c_{p}\Delta T where: q = rate of heat input W or J/s\.{m} = mass flow rate of air kg/sc_{p} = specific heat capacity of air at constant pressure 1005\,J/(kg\cdot K)\Delta T = change in temperature of the air as it passes through the pipe K Calculating updraft velocity To determine the velocity v of the exiting air, you can use the mass flow rate \.{m} and the air's final density \rho _{exit}: v=\frac{\.{m}}{\rho _{exit}A} where: \.{m} = mass flow rate kg/s\rho _{exit} = density of the air exiting the pipe kg/m^{3}A = cross-sectional area of the pipe m^{2}
By linking these equations, you can model how a specific thermal energy input q translates into a temperature change, which then drives the air flow Q and determines the exit velocity v.
The updraft is a self-sustaining process driven by the buoyancy created from the thermal energy input
So far so good with just extra coastal rain.
Forecasters watch tropical wave; Tropical Storm Kiko expected to become hurricane
Video NASA's New Space Station Has A Big Problem
NASA’s next-generation space station, built by Axiom Space, is meant to replace the ISS and pave the way for commercial space habitats. But behind the excitement, there’s a major problem that could jeopardize the entire project.
Indicates money issues and mismanagement but the first unit to be complete in 2025 and launched to connect to the Harmony side of the ISS.
AI Overview
SpaceX's Starship can carry a maximum of 100 metric tons of payload to the Moon, but this requires refueling the spacecraft in Earth's orbit. Without orbital refueling, Starship's cargo capacity for a lunar mission is significantly reduced.Orbital refueling for lunar missions
Because Starship is designed for full reusability, it expends most of its propellant getting into Earth orbit. To have enough fuel to travel to the Moon, land, and return, it must be refueled by multiple "tanker" Starships in low-Earth orbit (LEO).Mission architecture: This architecture involves launching a Starship lunar mission vehicle into LEO, followed by several tanker Starship launches to transfer propellant.
Payload capacity: With in-orbit refueling, the Starship Human Landing System (HLS) variant is designed to land up to 100 tons of payload on the lunar surface.
Number of refuels: The exact number of tanker flights required is still under development, with estimates ranging from 4 to over a dozen.
Payload for NASA's Artemis missions
For NASA's Artemis program, Starship will serve as the Human Landing System (HLS), which will ferry astronauts from lunar orbit to the surface. The HLS variant of Starship is specifically designed with modifications for lunar landing and operation.
Crew and cargo: The HLS includes features like an elevator to deploy crew and cargo to the lunar surface.Recent progress: As of late August 2025, a Starship test flight successfully deployed a test payload into Earth orbit, a crucial step towards demonstrating its payload capabilities. However, the much larger challenge of orbital refueling has yet to be demonstrated
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starship_HLS
AI Overview
An on-orbit payload half-fueled for a lunar mission is a theoretical scenario that does not align with SpaceX's current plan for Starship. For crewed lunar missions, the Starship Human Landing System (HLS) variant is designed to be fully fueled in low Earth orbit (LEO) by multiple tanker flights before departing for the Moon.The main reason for this full refueling is the physics of orbital mechanics:
Massive fuel requirement: A Starship carrying a significant payload requires nearly its full fuel load to achieve a lunar trajectory and land on the surface. It must rendezvous with multiple tanker Starships in LEO to receive enough liquid oxygen and methane to top off its tanks.
Delta-V demand: The change in velocity (delta-V) required to leave LEO, travel to the Moon, and descend to the surface is very high. A fully fueled Starship with a payload is designed to use almost all of its propellant for this portion of the mission.
Lunar landing: Unlike returning to Earth where atmospheric drag can assist with deceleration, the Moon's lack of atmosphere means the Starship must perform a propulsive, or rocket-powered, landing. This requires a substantial amount of fuel.
The Artemis III mission profileAs an example, consider NASA's Artemis III mission, which will use a Starship HLS to land astronauts on the lunar surface. The planned mission profile highlights why a half-fueled payload is not feasible:
A Starship HLS launches with its payload into LEO.The HLS is met by 10 to 20 tanker Starships to transfer propellant.
Once fully fueled, the Starship HLS departs Earth orbit for the Moon.
After landing, the HLS uses its engines to lift off from the lunar surface and return to lunar orbit, where it is not required to return to Earth as part of the initial contract.While early estimates from SpaceX indicated that only half-refueling might be necessary for the lunar HLS mission due to lower gravity, the most recent information and assessments suggest a much higher number of refueling flights are needed to fill the tanks completely. This is also due to the possibility of "boil-off," the evaporation of cryogenic propellants in orbit, which reduces the amount of usable fue
AI Overview
While specific fuel amounts are subject to change during development, SpaceX's Starship Human Landing System (HLS) requires a full propellant load of roughly 1,200 tons to return from the lunar surface to lunar orbit. This is followed by a journey back to Earth and is made possible by extensive refueling in Earth orbit.The departure profile for an Artemis mission
The Starship HLS lunar departure is part of a larger, complex mission architecture designed in cooperation with NASA for the Artemis program.Astronaut transfer: After exploring the lunar surface, astronauts board the Starship HLS from the Moon's surface.
Lift-off from the Moon: Using its powerful Raptor engines, the Starship HLS launches vertically from the lunar surface. It will use a combination of vacuum-optimized Raptor engines for primary ascent and side-mounted cold-gas or RCS thrusters for final adjustments and to mitigate lunar dust kick-up near the surface.Rendezvous in lunar orbit: The Starship HLS will then rendezvous and dock with a waiting Orion spacecraft in a Near-Rectilinear Halo Orbit (NRHO).
Transfer and return: The crew will transfer from Starship back into the Orion capsule, which will then transport them back to Earth.Why Starship needs to refuel for the moon mission
Unlike the Apollo lunar module, which was much smaller and had a two-stage design with a disposable ascent stage, Starship is a fully reusable, single-stage-to-orbit-from-the-moon system. It requires a significant amount of fuel for every stage of its journey:
Leaving Earth orbit (Trans-Lunar Injection): The ship needs fuel to depart low Earth orbit (LEO) and head toward the Moon.Landing on the Moon: Maneuvering into lunar orbit and performing a soft landing requires a substantial amount of propellant.
Leaving the Moon: Taking off from the lunar surface to rendezvous with the Orion capsule in NRHO requires a very large amount of fuel.The role of orbital refueling
Due to Starship's mass and the fuel needed for the round trip, it is impossible for a single launch to carry all the necessary propellant.Tanker flights: Multiple Starship tanker vehicles will launch from Earth and refuel a Starship propellant depot in Earth orbit.
Depot rendezvous: The Starship HLS for the lunar mission will launch, dock with the depot, and take on its full load of fuel before departing for the Moon. SpaceX's orbital refueling system is currently still under developmen
For the record, here are the NewMars members currently set up to log into the phpBB3 NewMars test site.
The test site is able to accept images for display on the NewMars site via link.
SpaceNut
GW Johnson
RobertDyck
CallibanThe login address is: http://40.75.112.55/phpBB3/ucp.php?mode … =index.php
The password is whatever you set when you opened the account. Most likely it is the same as you use on NewMars.
(th)
I have forgotten my account password from so long ago and the email option did not seem to function.
Then again its been over a year since I was last able to get on a real computer.
Currently I am using the laptop. Send to my email if you would.
Thank
You
AI Overview
The Falcon Heavy has a maximum payload of 63,800 kg (140,700 lbs) to Low Earth Orbit (LEO) when fully expendable and about 26,700 kg (58,860 lbs) to Geostationary Transfer Orbit (GTO). With boosters recovered, the LEO payload is around 57,000 kg, decreasing further if the core stage is also recovered. The payload capacity depends on the mission profile and whether the boosters are recovered for reuse.
Payload Capacities by Orbit and ModeFully Expendable:
LEO: 63,800 kg (140,700 lbs)
GTO: 26,700 kg (58,860 lbs)Mars: 16,800 kg (37,040 lbs)
With Boosters Recovered:
LEO: ~57,000 kg (126,000 lbs)Key Factors Influencing Payload Mass
Expendability:
The highest payload mass is achieved in a fully expendable configuration, where booster recovery is not prioritized, and therefore all available fuel is used for lift.
Booster Recovery:Recovering the two side boosters and the center core reduces the rocket's maximum lift capability to space because less fuel is available for the mission, according to Wikipedia.
Mission Profile:The intended orbit and trajectory for the payload significantly impact the required launch energy and, consequently, the maximum attainable payload mass, notes Space Exploration Stack Exchange.
Comparison or the
AI Overview
For version 2 of Starship, SpaceX promised a payload mass of 100–150 metric tons to low-Earth orbit (LEO) in a fully reusable configuration. This represents a significant increase over the payload capacity of its predecessor, Block 1.Payload mass by version
While SpaceX continues to rapidly iterate, the progression of Starship payload capabilities can be tracked by its different "Blocks".Block 1: An early version used for orbital test flights, with a reusable payload mass of about 15 tons.
Block 2 (Current): Features a stretched propellant tank, reduced dry mass, and a more robust heat shield design. This allows it to meet the promised reusable payload capacity of 100 to 150 metric tons.
Block 3 (Future): This next-generation version is expected to further increase payload to 200 metric tons in a reusable configuration and up to 400 metric tons in an expendable mode. It will be taller and will use more powerful Raptor 3 engines.
Factors influencing version 2 payloadThe higher performance of Starship version 2 compared to version 1 is achieved through several key upgrades:
Stretched tanks: Increases propellant capacity to boost performance.
Reduced dry mass: Optimizes the vehicle's structural design to carry more payload relative to its own weight.Advanced heat shield: Enhances thermal protection during re-entry to improve reusability.
Upgraded avionics: Supports more complex missions and capabilities, such as on-orbit refueling.Primary payloads for version 2
A primary driver for the increased payload capacity is the deployment of next-generation Starlink satellites, known as "V3" satellites.
Each V3 satellite is much larger and heavier than previous versions.A single Starship launch is expected to deploy a massive number of V3 satellites, potentially adding 20 times the network capacity of a Falcon 9 launch.
In addition to Starlink, the version 2 Starship will also be used for other critical missions, including the Human Landing System (HLS) for NASA's Artemis program
The usernames TestID* are not in the banned and the last id created is TestID18375.
This part of a rockets landing equations where the molecular content with the amount of resistance to movement and changes heat build up due to the friction that an atmoshere.
I just check the list of Banned and these are the unconverted accounts that remain. such as username Ufo_man is now testun1 as I need to find where it was left off at.
I was first removed from the banned list then the username was updated in the profile and set to inactive.
The old account shows 3 posts and while can set the post counter to 0 we might delete topics if they hold the first post if not removed so that the remaining discusion stays.
They forget that its been a main stay for making money for Elon to continue refining the BFR and Starship that will have a much lower flight rate which will rise costs even when its reused.
Sure its just 63 mT versus the promised 100 mT for starship which is not designed for the cargo or manned use at this time.
AI Overview
Falcon 9 has become the all time leader in cargo mass ...
The SpaceX Falcon 9's payload capacity depends on the specific version and whether the first stage is recovered. A fully expendable Falcon 9 can carry 22,800 kg (50,265 lbs) to Low Earth Orbit (LEO) and 8,300 kg (18,300 lbs) to a Geostationary Transfer Orbit (GTO). However, for reusable Falcon 9 flights, the payload to LEO is reduced to approximately 18,500 kg (40,800 lbs) and to GTO, it is around 5,500 kg (12,100 lbs).
Here's a breakdown of Falcon 9 payload mass limitations:
Expendable vs. Reusable
Expendable:
When the first stage is not recovered and expended, the payload capacity is at its maximum.
Reusable:
To enable the first stage to land and be reused, the rocket carries less propellant, resulting in a reduced payload mass to orbit.
Orbital Targets
Low Earth Orbit (LEO): A lower orbit, where the payload can often be heavier.
Geostationary Transfer Orbit (GTO): A higher, more challenging orbit, which typically lowers the rocket's available payload capacity.
Specific Figures for Falcon 9 Block 5 (Current Generation)
LEO: 22,800 kg (expendable) / 18,500 kg (reusable)
GTO: 8,300 kg (expendable) / 5,500 kg (reusable)
From what I read it did do a single engine burn but not for long as it was testing reigniting the engine in a vaccumn before it did a deburn from orbit. From what is described the starship look fairly beat up as it neared the ocean showing lots of burning on its skin.
Offtherock, tahanson43206 has direct server placement control or upload to it so it is hosted on it and then can be linked for image display.
They also have secondary hardening and machining as required after being made.
the MDRS is posted in the Mars Analogue Research Stations forum folder
For SpaceNut re post in HowTo...
https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.ph … 60#p233960
Thanks for that link to the discussion in the phpBB# forum!
Also ... your updates in the wind topic are interesting, for sure, but they are about rotary wind mills. The Airloom system does NOT use rotary blades. If you haven't had a chance to look at the web site, you might find the pictures interesting. I don't try to upload the pictures when I upload the monthly report. You will see a group of entrepreneurs at work.
***
Hoping your roof replacement is going well! We are enjoying a lull before the next hurricane.(th)
It is a misconception that the blade needs to be attached to a shaft that spins as the blade moves or spins in the plain of the belt that they are attached to a belt, acts as a summing of the wind forces that are pushing on the blades. The number of blade count increase from one to a sum that no long increases the force that is collected from the speed of the traveling wind.
The rotation takes place around the center of the struction that has pulleys that attach to the structure that alowws for the belt to move around it as the blade is pushed.
The belt allows for slow rpm wind to create power based on ratio of the belt length to shaft of the generator circumference. This is simular to that of an engine crank shaft to that of the alternator pulleys for ratio.
The rpm is measure and timed from a single point on the belt to get a number for the ratio of spin that the genrator will rquire.
Wind power is generated by the force wind exerts on the blades of a turbine, causing the turbine’s shaft to rotate at a speed of 10 to 20 revolutions per minute (rpm). To produce power efficiently, wind turbines require wind speeds above seven miles per hour for electricity generation
Wind Speed and RPM for1 kW Power Output
The wind speed and rotational speed (RPM) required to produce 1 Kw of power from a wind turbine are dependent on several factors, including the turbine's design, size, and the specific wind conditions.
Factors Influencing Power Output
Turbine Size and Design: Smaller wind turbines, often used in residential settings, typically require higher RPMs to generate power compared to larger, utility-scale turbines. This is because larger turbines compensate for slower rotation with longer blades, which capture more wind and have a greater swept area.
Wind Speed: The power produced by a wind turbine is directly related to the cube of the wind speed. This means that a small increase in wind speed can lead to a significant increase in power output. For example, if the wind speed doubles, the power output can increase by a factor of 2^3=8.
Tip Speed Ratio (TSR): The TSR is the ratio of the speed of the blade tip to the wind speed. Wind turbines are designed to operate efficiently within a specific TSR range, which influences the optimal RPM for power generation at a given wind speed.
Generator Requirements: Most generators require a specific rotational speed, often in the range of 1,000 to 1,800 RPM to produce electricity at the desired frequency of 50 to 60 hz.
Gearboxes are commonly used in wind turbines to increase the relatively slow rotational speed of the blades to the higher speed required by the generator.
Typical RPM Ranges for 1Kw Turbines
For small wind turbines, such as those rated for 1 Kw the rotor RPM typically falls within the range of 200 to 400 RPM to begin generating electricity. The exact RPM at which 1 Kw to begin generating electricity is produced will vary based on the specific turbine model and the prevailing wind speed.
torque and speed to generator 1kw of powerThinkingKicking off 5 searchesLooking at 77 sitesPutting it all together To produce 1 kilowatt (kW) of power, the required torque and speed are inversely related, meaning there isn't one single combination. You can use a high torque with low speed or low torque with high speed to achieve the same power output. The specific values depend on the generator's design and operating efficiency. Key relationship The fundamental relationship is expressed by the mechanical power formula:P=\tau \cdot \omega where: P is mechanical power in watts (W).\tau is torque in newton-meters (N·m).\omega is angular velocity in radians per second (rad/s). Since 1 kW is 1000 W, the ideal mechanical input power required is 1000 W. For a real-world generator, you must account for its efficiency, which will require a higher mechanical input than the electrical output. Calculating torque and speed To determine the values for torque (\tau ) and speed (n), you must choose one variable and calculate the other.
The formulas below include the constant for converting revolutions per minute (rpm) to radians per second. With revolutions per minute (rpm)\tau [N\cdot m]=9550\cdot \frac{P[kW]}{n[rpm]}n[rpm]=9550\cdot \frac{P[kW]}{\tau [N\cdot m]}
Note:
These formulas assume 100% efficiency. For a real-world generator, you must divide the output power by the generator's efficiency (e.g., 0.8 for 80% efficiency).
Example calculations for a 1 kW output:
The table below shows example torque values for a range of common speeds, assuming an 85% generator efficiency.Input Power (ideal): 1kW=1000WInput Power (with 85% efficiency): 1000W/0.85\approx 1176W Generator Speed (n) Input Torque (\tau )Calculation Example50 rpm224 N·m(9550\times 1.176)/50300 rpm37.3 N·m(9550\times 1.176)/300900 rpm12.4 N·m(9550\times 1.176)/9001800 rpm6.2 N·m(9550\times 1.176)/18003600 rpm3.1 N·m(9550\times 1.176)/3600
Factors that influence the required torque and speed Generator efficiency:
Real generators are not 100% efficient.
The mechanical input power must be greater than the electrical output power to overcome losses from friction, heat, and electrical resistance.
Prime mover:
The specific combination of torque and speed will also be influenced by the driving power source (e.g., a motor, wind turbine, or water turbine), which has its own torque-speed characteristics.
Application:
The required speed may be fixed for certain applications. For example, to produce 60 Hz power, many generators must operate at a specific synchronous speed, such as 1800 rpm or 3600 rpm.
First equation for wind created power.
Air speed, mass, and force are related through the principles of aerodynamics and Newton's laws of motion. Force is the product of mass and acceleration (F=ma). For objects moving through air, the speed (specifically, the velocity relative to the air) influences the aerodynamic forces acting on the object, such as lift and drag. These forces are proportional to the density of the air, the relative velocity squared, and the object's frontal area.
How they are connected:
Force & Mass/Acceleration:
.
Newton's second law states that a net force applied to an object causes it to accelerate, changing its speed. An object's mass dictates how much it resists this change in motion (inertia).
Air Speed & Aerodynamic Force:
.
When an object moves through air, it experiences aerodynamic forces. The faster the relative air speed, the greater the force exerted by the air on the object, with the force increasing by the square of the velocity.
Mass Flow Rate:
.
The mass of air passing a point over time is the mass flow rate, which can be calculated by multiplying density, velocity, and area.
Examples:
Aircraft Lift:
.
A wing is shaped to make air travel faster over the top surface than the bottom. This increased speed reduces pressure, creating an upward lift force.
Falling Objects:
.
As an object falls, air resistance (a form of aerodynamic drag) opposes gravity. This resistance, which depends on the object's speed, increases as the object falls faster.
Terminal Velocity:
.
Eventually, the drag force equals the force of gravity, and the object stops accelerating, reaching a constant speed called terminal velocity. A parachute increases drag by increasing the surface area, which slows the descent
second is the force against the windmill blade.
Wind turbine blades generate force from the interaction between their speed, the air's speed and density, and their shape, but the mass of the blade itself is a factor that influences how quickly it accelerates and its resistance to changes in motion, affecting the turbine's overall rotational dynamics. Specifically, the blade experiences aerodynamic lift and drag forces as it moves through the wind, with the tips moving faster and generating more lift than the base. This interaction, combined with the mass of the blade, creates a system where the blade's mass affects the overall moment of inertia, influencing how the blade responds to the varying forces of the wind and how quickly it reaches an optimal operating speed.
Aerodynamic Forces & Blade Motion
Air Speed:
.
The speed of the air passing the blade is a combination of the real wind speed and the "headwind" created by the blade's own rotation.
Lift and Drag:
.
The air moving over the blade's surface creates aerodynamic forces: lift, which causes rotation, and drag, which opposes motion.
Relative Air Speed:
.
The relative air speed varies along the blade, with the tips moving much faster than the roots, resulting in greater lift at the tips.
Angle of Attack:
.
Blades will gather speed until their motion reduces the angle of attack of the air to approximately zero, at which point they stop generating lift and maintain their speed.
Mass of the Blade
Moment of Inertia:
A blade's mass is a crucial component of its moment of inertia, a measure of its resistance to changes in rotational motion.
Acceleration:
A larger mass (and thus greater moment of inertia) means a smaller acceleration, which affects how long it takes for the blades to reach their steady-state operational speed.
Fatigue and Design:
Blade mass is also an important consideration for fatigue loading and the overall design of the wind turbine, with longer, heavier blades generally being characteristic of turbines with higher power ratings.
Relationship Between Factors
Energy Transfer:
A turbine's blades extract power from the moving air, converting kinetic energy into rotational mechanical energy.
Mass and Speed:
While the mass of the air is what carries the energy, the mass of the blade itself is what receives the force from the air and translates it into rotation.
Dynamic Balance:
There is a complex dynamic balance between wind speed, blade speed, blade geometry, air density, and the blade's mass to achieve efficient power generation
seems this is a choice
Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › RL10
Thrust (altitude): 24,750 lbf (110.1 kN) · Specific impulse: 465.5 seconds (4.565 km/s) · Engine weight, dry: 664 lb (301.2 kg) · Height: 163.5 in (4.14 m) ...
AI Overview
+7
The RL10 is a high-performance, liquid-fueled upper-stage rocket engine from Aerojet Rocketdyne that uses liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen (LH2/LOX) propellants. Key specifications include thrusts around 25,000 pounds (110 kN) for models like the RL10B-2, very high specific impulses of over 465 seconds, and an expander cycle. The engine's performance is highly reliable and it has been continuously upgraded for missions like NASA's Space Launch System (SLS) and commercial launchers such as Atlas and Delta.
Key Specifications (RL10B-2 Model):
Thrust: 24,750 lbf (110 kN)
Specific Impulse (Isp): 465.5 seconds (4.565 km/s)
Engine Weight (dry): 664 lb (301.2 kg)
Propellants: Liquid Hydrogen (LH2) and Liquid Oxygen (LOX)
Cycle Type: Expander Cycle
Propellant Mixture Ratio: ~5.88 to 1 (Oxygen:Hydrogen by mass)
Key Features and Development
High Performance:
The RL10 is the world's highest-performance upper-stage rocket engine, known for its high efficiency thanks to its expander cycle and expandable nozzle.
Reliability:
It has a long history of reliable operation, with millions of accumulated hot-fire seconds and a demonstrated reliability of 0.9998.
Evolution:
The engine family has been continuously upgraded since its original design for the Centaur upper stage. Modern versions incorporate features like 3D printing and extendable nozzles for improved performance.
Applications:
The RL10 powers upper stages for various launch vehicles, including the Space Launch System (SLS) Interim Cryogenic Propulsion Stage (ICPS) and Exploration Upper Stage (EUS), as well as ULA's Atlas and Delta rockets and the Vulcan Centaur.
Manufacturing:
Recent advancements involve using 3D printing to create components from materials like copper, which enables complex geometries not possible with traditional methods.
Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › RL10
Thrust (altitude): 24,750 lbf (110.1 kN) · Specific impulse: 465.5 seconds (4.565 km/s) · Engine weight, dry: 664 lb (301.2 kg) · Height: 163.5 in (4.14 m) ...
AI Overview
+7
The RL10 is a high-performance, liquid-fueled upper-stage rocket engine from Aerojet Rocketdyne that uses liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen (LH2/LOX) propellants. Key specifications include thrusts around 25,000 pounds (110 kN) for models like the RL10B-2, very high specific impulses of over 465 seconds, and an expander cycle. The engine's performance is highly reliable and it has been continuously upgraded for missions like NASA's Space Launch System (SLS) and commercial launchers such as Atlas and Delta.
Key Specifications (RL10B-2 Model):
Thrust: 24,750 lbf (110 kN)
Specific Impulse (Isp): 465.5 seconds (4.565 km/s)
Engine Weight (dry): 664 lb (301.2 kg)
Propellants: Liquid Hydrogen (LH2) and Liquid Oxygen (LOX)
Cycle Type: Expander Cycle
Propellant Mixture Ratio: ~5.88 to 1 (Oxygen:Hydrogen by mass)
Key Features and Development
High Performance:
The RL10 is the world's highest-performance upper-stage rocket engine, known for its high efficiency thanks to its expander cycle and expandable nozzle.
Reliability:
It has a long history of reliable operation, with millions of accumulated hot-fire seconds and a demonstrated reliability of 0.9998.
Evolution:
The engine family has been continuously upgraded since its original design for the Centaur upper stage. Modern versions incorporate features like 3D printing and extendable nozzles for improved performance.
Applications:
The RL10 powers upper stages for various launch vehicles, including the Space Launch System (SLS) Interim Cryogenic Propulsion Stage (ICPS) and Exploration Upper Stage (EUS), as well as ULA's Atlas and Delta rockets and the Vulcan Centaur.
Manufacturing:
Recent advancements involve using 3D printing to create components from materials like copper, which enables complex geometries not possible with traditional methods.
after making a post at the top of the refreshed page this message shows.
Debug: Database connection successful
DUAL LIQUID FLYBACK BOOSTER FOR THE SPACE SHUTTLE
SHUTTLE LIQUID FLY BACK BOOSTER CONFIGURATION
in essence the Falcon first stage have achived the reuse concept of the article
The Universal Reusable First Stage
Fly back booster patent
Lockheed's first-stage flyback booster
Lockheed explored reusable launch systems with concepts like the Reusable First Stage (RFS) Vehicle, also known as the Liquid Flyback Booster (LFBB), designed to replace the Space Shuttle's solid rocket boosters. This system featured a first stage that would launch vertically, then separate from the main spacecraft, and autonomously glide or fly back to a runway for reuse, significantly reducing operational costs and improving safety. While a full-scale, flight-tested scale model was developed, the project, which included a fully reusable design for the entire Space Shuttle system, was ultimately not funded and never implemented with the actual Space Shuttle.
Key Aspects of the LFBB Concept
Replace Solid Boosters:
The LFBB was designed to replace the existing solid rocket boosters (SRBs) of the Space Shuttle with fully reusable liquid-fueled boosters.Self-Powered Return:
After boosting the shuttle and external tank, the LFBB would perform a powered, winged return flight to the launch site or a runway, similar to a large aircraft.
Cost Savings:
The main goal was to dramatically lower operational costs by eliminating the need to refurbish and rebuild expendable boosters after each mission.
Improved Safety & Performance:
The fully reusable liquid boosters were also expected to increase safety by providing greater flexibility, such as single-engine-out capability during ascent, and improve overall system performance.
Autonomous Operation:
The LFBB was designed to be capable of autonomous return and landing at the launch site.
Development and Outcome
Early Concepts:
.
The idea for a reusable flyback first stage dates back to the early 1970s as part of Lockheed's vision for a fully reusable shuttle system.
Scale Model Testing:
.
In the mid-2000s, Lockheed Martin Space Systems conducted flight tests of a scale model of a liquid flyback booster as part of internally funded research.
Lack of Funding:
.
Despite its potential, the fully reusable rocket design was ultimately shelved due to budget cuts, and the project never moved beyond the concept and testing phases. The Space Shuttle continued to use its expendable solid rocket boosters for its operational lifespan
The Delta IV Heavy rocket uses liquid hydrogen (LH2) as fuel and liquid oxygen (LOx) as oxidizer for its three main RS-68A engines, located on the common booster cores (first stage), and for the RL10 engine in its second stage. At liftoff, the three engines ignite, burning the hydrogen and oxygen to generate immense thrust, with the two side boosters jettisoning after they run out of fuel and the central booster continuing to fire before separating.
First Stage (Common Booster Cores)
Engines:
Each of the three Common Booster Cores (CBCs) is powered by an Aerojet Rocketdyne RS-68A engine.
Propellants:
These engines burn liquid hydrogen (LH2) as the fuel and liquid oxygen (LOx) as the oxidizer.
Function:
At liftoff, all three engines ignite to provide maximum thrust. The center core then throttles down to conserve fuel while the side boosters continue at full power. Once the side boosters are depleted, they separate from the rocket, and the central booster ramps back up to full thrust to carry the rocket through the thickest parts of the atmosphere.
Second Stage
Engine: The Delta IV Heavy's upper stage uses a single RL10 engine.
Propellants: Like the first stage, this engine also uses liquid hydrogen (LH2) and liquid oxygen (LOx).
Function: After the first stage boosters are jettisoned, the RL10 engine ignites for one or more burns to propel the payload into its final orbit.
The Delta IV Heavy's second stage, the Delta Cryogenic Second Stage (DCSS), is powered by a single Aerojet Rocketdyne RL10 engine, which uses liquid hydrogen (LH2) and liquid oxygen (LOX) as propellants to fuel the engine and place the payload into its final orbit. The DCSS consists of a large, cylindrical LH2 tank with the LOX tank suspended below it, from which the RL10 engine, featuring an extendable carbon-carbon nozzle for improved performance, is attached.
Engine and Propellants
Engine: A single, vacuum-optimized Aerojet Rocketdyne RL10 engine is used.
Propellants: The engine burns liquid hydrogen (LH2) as the fuel and liquid oxygen (LOX) as the oxidizer, which are cryogenic propellants.
Stage Architecture
Unique Design:
The DCSS features a unique two-tank architecture, where the liquid hydrogen tank forms the upper section and carries the payload launch loads.
LOX Tank and Engine:
The LOX tank is suspended from the LH2 tank and provides structural support for the engine.
Function
Orbital Insertion:
After the first stage separates, the second stage ignites to perform the final engine burns.
Precision Control:
The RL10 engine's ability to restart and adjust its thrust is crucial for fine-tuning the rocket's trajectory to achieve the precise orbit required for the payload.