You are not logged in.

Announcement

Announcement: This forum is accepting new registrations via email. Please see Recruiting Topic for additional information. Write newmarsmember[at_symbol]gmail.com.

#201 Re: Human missions » The reason to go to mars - Going to mars is not a waste of money » 2005-05-06 06:49:06

Dook,

No Profit , what have you been smoking ? The organization that gets a dominant position in space for business will be a major space player that other group/s will work with including the governments of earth. Remember the main space players will make the rules for everyone else.

First and Foremost you are not throwing US$100 Billion to just satisfy a trekkie fantasy. Each investment into infrastructure in space is an asset and will bring generate income through the form of lease agreements with other parties  (both government and non-government)

Put it this way the combined budgets of USA, Europe, China, and Russian currently don't make that volume in funding through their governments because they don't see the value. The have other domestic issues to attend too. Thus If Business Organization has assets in space they want to use or lease they could an provide income, simply like a property rental agreements.

Thus you can derive a income stream from your space assets on earth from other parties and will provide additional growth for space activities in general, bring more private industry at a lower cost base into space.

I am not talking about the ISS pityful space station either, something alot larger and better that could have a permanent crew spinning in orbit providing a home in orbit for all third party personnel and organization personnel. Other Platforms that could provide space for experiments and small scale manufacturing again lease to third parties.

You just have a closed mind, Dook, Space will be a larger diverse economy than the combined countries of earth.

#202 Re: Human missions » The reason to go to mars - Going to mars is not a waste of money » 2005-05-06 05:58:35

Dook,

I am not talking about the pityful budget of NASA to build the industrial and mining sectors in space. You need to look at the problem from a whole different level of resource requirements and the application of resources to build the infrastructure. I am talking about US$100 Billion budget per year funded primary by the Global Business Entities.

If you don't think it can't happen then you are limited by the words  ( can't, shouldn't couldn't won't don't  ) because It can happen and you need to work on a purely global level. First think that you have 6 billion customers what you can sell them all at $30 per month per year as a subscription - even if you only get 10% of the Market that equals 600 M x$30 = $18 billion x 12 = $ 216 Billion and Using US$100 Billion doesn't think impossible. Say it takes 15 years to build the infrastructure to make the money then from 2020 -2035 = 1.5Trillion dollars, that 30 years from now then another 20 years adds 2 trillion dollars more resources ( infrastructure, personnel, space assets, lunar assets , martian assets and more ) now we are 2055, the next 50 years you would generate another 5 Trillion Dollars from earth but doesn't count on the mining and industrial capacity in space that is developed from 2035 onwards to reduce the dependence of earth resources. 

These are the numbers that you need to work towards to build the work outside the earth and take humanity into space. Also Dook I can prove everything that I have typed and I know one product that could do this volume of monetary sales. 

I am currently working on a number of projects that income generating to build some of the necessary components for the infrastructure required for the global resource gathering for the expansion of space for humanity.

Also Dook, Battlestar Galactica, Star Trek are futuristic and I am talking about the current level of technology and expansion of real hardware, and real desires for humanity in space.  You need to broaden your minds into understand of resource allocation on a planetary scale not a small country scale like USA or UK.

Secondly, You asked why I am here,

Because I believe that the next large population for each will be Mars but we need the infrastructure to get there and I agree with the idea to get to the moon and use it as a testing facility for humanity living permanently in space.  When we move to Mars we have a fully trained workforce for the planet and also technologies to work on low - G Worlds.

But I don't like the Explorer Missions planning only, I think they are first step - foothold phase but the beach head phase would be outposts up to 50+ personnel and that requires infrastructure backing from earth-lunar space. If we haven't got those goals then we are just tourists in space and I am not working on being a tourist but a participating member of the our solar system ( or can be called - the terran star system)

#203 Re: Human missions » The reason to go to mars - Going to mars is not a waste of money » 2005-05-05 19:55:28

Dook,

Colonization means the permanent human presence in space. within the next 30 years we will have permanent presence in LEO and Lunar surface. Within 50 years we will have permanent presence on Mars, within that timeframe we will also have mining operations on the moon, and asteroids that are funded privately.

So wake up, by your so called 100 years we will have 50,000 + humans spread across the solar system with concentrations on LEO, Moon, Mars, Asteroid Belt, and smaller outposts on the moons of jupiter and saturn. Many other explorer missions would also be done by that time and the possibility of intersystem travel happening as well.

Current History (1960)

45 years ago not main computer infrastructure on earth, not internet, limited transport between continents and extremely limited space activity.

Today (2005)

Main Information Technology Infrastructure across earth, advance information networks ( like the internet ), major travel between continents on a regular basis and multiple countries and private enterprise involved in space.

That's why you Dook, don't understand human desires about space and the expansion of the frontiers of knowledge and the humanity's expansion of society through the understanding of space and where we fit in the universe.

#204 Re: Human missions » The reason to go to mars - Going to mars is not a waste of money » 2005-05-05 17:13:43

The colonization of space will rely on the development of mining and industrial sector in space. We first use some resources on earth to expand our foothold into near space ( LEO and Lunar surface) then we expand the human and robotic personnel in this region to create an industrial and mining sectors. Meanwhile, explorer and prospector missions are sent to Mars, Asteroid Belt and beyond.

Once we have established the foothold space industrial and mining sectors on the moon we expand by using these resources to expand towards Mars with large outposts in multiple locations.

Valuation of resources and assets will run into the trillions of dollars but that is a valuation not physical monetary resources. example : 200MT of Nickel asteroid at $1500 per tonne would value the single asteroid at 300 Billion Dollars. With a dozen similar size mining operations could have an asset value of trillions but the cost to mine, process and have a market to sell the resources are required as well. All these are part of a future space economy, not an extension of earth economy but separate an distinct marketplace expanding over many different bodies through our solar system.

#205 Re: Human missions » Post central for information on CEV III - Continued from previous » 2005-05-03 17:50:00

Today News

Lockheed Martin and Boeing have signed a deal to create a joint venture company called United Launch Alliance to stop the fued and legal action that has been going on between these companies.

Interesting that Atlas and Delta Rockets will be under one joint venture company.

#206 Re: Human missions » China The Dominant Superpower In 20 Years..... - What does this mean for US? » 2005-05-03 17:44:06

" Collapse " a load of crap !!!!!!!!

The chinese economy has alot more stored productivity in it and haven't completed the remodelling phase of their economy. There is still at least 10-15 years of industrial development and growth ahead for the chinese economy the only issue is energy. But with the new contracts for LPG and Oil contracts it will meet the growth targets and hold the growth over the next few years just under 9% per year.

By 2008 when they have the summer olympics they might have a permanent presence in space with the purchase of docking systems from Russia. That will show to the chinese population that their country is growing and innovating and thus people will work more on improving the country's status in the world.

With the changes in the UN, china will have a larger role in world affairs, the changes in Alliance of South-East Asian Nation (ASEAN) and possible discussions with Tiawan and the large contracts with Australia for natural resources, China will have the power to expand into space and become a World Power in Space.

#207 Re: Human missions » NASA is screwed up. - I have no patience left :-( » 2005-05-02 00:58:58

Michael,

The main reason to go back to the moon is that the CEV must be testing with missions close to earth so we can help if required. The public is a mean beast, if they don't see positive results they will urge to scrap things. The only way to win for Mars Missions is to expand slowly into space and make society feel this is permanent movement into space and then increased funding will come from success after success.

We need the testing ground for colonization tools such as virtual robotic control systems and the various of different machines that could be used in the development process including mining machines. All need to be tested in a non-earth environment with low gravity like Mars. We also need the development of a space economy to grow from earth and travel across the solar system.

More and More research is required for space settlement and colonization. A off-world communication system would also provide additional support infrastructure for future explorer and settlement missions for mars and beyond. More systems, infrastructure, training and support systems will be invented and used on the lunar surface before we go to the mars and beyond in a meaningful way except with small / micro missions.

#208 Re: Human missions » NASA is screwed up. - I have no patience left :-( » 2005-04-30 04:22:54

Darkstar,

It depends on the infrastructure in low earth orbit and on ground stations to build a large vessel for mars missions. We could assemble a ship from new components and recycling other ship components from other missions and engine assemblies as well. 

We could launch manned and unmanned vessels together in a convoy or fleet ( " The first martian fleet " ) that would bring all necessary supplies including vehicles for an outpost setup for martian surface. The fleet could be used and reused over and over again to make the voyage between earth and mars.

It comes down to planning !!!!!!!!!!

#209 Re: Human missions » Where do you see the future of NASA? - A player in a PANAMERICAN ESA? » 2005-04-23 03:27:00

Don't trust governments to do the job, private enterprise will do it, unless the world governments are competitive enough to cause a space race for the resources out there.

#210 Re: Human missions » Should NASA be merged with other space agencies? - Creating a Unified, Single framework. » 2005-04-22 22:32:01

First and foremost the red tape in the United States and Any other government in the world is vast, but that is government. !!!!!!

Fledi, the rules for private industry space program are there under the outer space treaty and have been formulated by the United States, Australia, and many other countries through space industry legislation. If you follow the process, meet and continue to meet requirements and paid the annual government fees for a license to launch into space and conduct a space facilities, then yes you can have a private space program.

Privatisation of Space is a major goal and very important one to expand humanity in space and create a solar system based economy to pay for the huge costs to maintain and provide a return on expenditure. Also the population of non-earth population must increase into space upwards of 100,000 to start to build a viable economy until then we need to create primary trade with earth or earth related activities and projects.  This goal could be achieved within one century.

The major mining operations need development on an automated basis to take humans out of the process to extract ore from asteroids, and other extreme environment planets and moons. The centralized spac agency primary goal is co-ordination not development or launching that is country space agency, but the centralized agency aslo create the laws and control outside the world onbehalf of the whole world, not the country space agencies. Please won't accept the Russian laws in space or American laws in space or the chinese law in space then what about global human law in space.

#211 Re: Human missions » Going to Mars - Am I the only one? » 2005-04-21 22:27:15

First the Solar Power Array is in orbit getting continous light from the Sun. The solar array use a concentration mirror system to increase the light level increase the available useage. Next, the supplies for each settlement are dropped from cargo transports in orbit to each base, until permanment transport is established.

All local droids are client-server architecture based designed with some automated systems. Each Base has a group of telerobotic trained personnel to manage and oversee the movement of supplies and expansion of base facilities.

#212 Re: Human missions » Should NASA be merged with other space agencies? - Creating a Unified, Single framework. » 2005-04-21 22:16:18

The UN Will not disappear, but will undego a new transformation as the security council is going through right now. GCN the odds for the UN to disappear would be the same for the US government turn socialist, because the rest of the world wouldn't allow it to happen, and America wouldn't allow it to happen and lose control through deal making.

Secondly, No member state has the right to act outside the world unless it is within the governing outer space treaty enacted by the UN and voted on by the member states including all the major space races.

Thirdly, the legal framework for space movement should be through a global body overseeing the various member state public-owned facilities and any current or future privately owned facilities.

#213 Re: Human missions » Should NASA be merged with other space agencies? - Creating a Unified, Single framework. » 2005-04-20 20:04:36

Then create a new one under the United Nations called the UN Space Agency, It could start out managing the Outer Space Treaty and then work towards more active role in space development and exploration for the whole of humanity.

Leave all the Country Agencies running there programs but the rules and laws are controlled through the application in  the world court, the forum to enforce the space treaty enacted into Global UN Law and binding on all citizens represented by the member states.

That would be more interesting then trying to get the other countries to work together.

#214 Re: Human missions » ISS Woes & To-Mars » 2005-04-20 19:50:59

ISS wasn't designed well to start off with !!!

But more damage could occur if NASA and American Government doesn't allow others to play in its sandbox. It could cost alot of new technology advancements, personnel sharing, information sharing and more. Suck the pride in and get on doing the right work and advancing humanity into space.

#215 Re: Human missions » Going to Mars - Am I the only one? » 2005-04-19 19:36:47

FLedi,

After the explorer / survey phase of Mars is complete around 2035 ( single vessels type landings ) when we go for settlement phase starting 2040- then it should be in multiple locations using a fleet of unmanned cargo transports ( 4-6) and 1-2 human transports for the ground personnel. including a portable solar array cargo transport and packable space station transport and one other vessel a satellite transport for orbit placement of communication and other satellites for martian orbit.

Our modern version of a "wagon train for the new promised land" each human transport carries up to  6 landing pods  each, each pod has supplies for 6-8 people. The pods can be used as emergency escape modules as well. As many as 2 droids for surface work per human would also arrive to commence construction work on the planet, some general work other specialized like a droid cranes, dozers,diggers and more.

While the first fleet nears the red planet, another unmanned cargo fleet would be uinder development for the next cargo run to the planet.  Currently we don't have any the infrastructure required to launch the settlement missions successfully and we need to build the infrastructure including the large volume of resources required including the large variety of droids required for the explorer through to construction activities on the martian surface.

Alot of work ahead !!!!!!!!!!!

big_smile

#216 Re: Human missions » Going to Mars - Am I the only one? » 2005-04-18 18:48:30

Fledi,

Good saying "Don't put all your eggs in one basket" , our colonization approach should be development on that saying because we want to limit all risks associated with colonization and improve the benefits. You can plan the settlements with standard modules (living quarters, recreation areas ) and specialized modules. ( government / authorities areas, large spaceport, manufacturing / mining areas, agriculture and more.)  Also with 3 settlements apart approx. 30kms ( 20 miles ) then we could explore outwards another 30 kms safety that equals 120x120 = 1440 sq kms area not 360 sq kms from a single settlement. 

Also we can have a large population on the surface then with a single settlement and also have a larger droid presence ( under human control ) on the surface as well. Also requires more cargo transports and human centric transports from earth to mars thus creating a large space infrastructure around earth and on moon to manufacture the cargo transports, and human transports and explorer vessels and other special purpose vessels.

#217 Re: Human missions » Going to Mars - Am I the only one? » 2005-04-17 20:15:51

Cheaper to build above ground development they tunnelling miles and miles through the martian soil. We need to build and layout two or three sizable outposts within 30 kms from each other and point one as the principal settlement for government and authority management. We need as a grid of communication and global positioning satellites (GPS) in geostationary orbit around Mars to provide the correct information and monitoring facilities for all the ongoing probes and droid surveying of the planet.

In order to get to this stage of mars settlement evolution we need a vast fleet of cargo transports (unmanned and / or manned ) that would bring the necessary cargo to the settlements as well go further into the solar system for exploration and resource collecting purposes.

We don't need to waste time and resources making things difficult for the development of the planetary resources for mars and the expansion of human settlement into space.

#218 Re: Human missions » Selling out Mars and Science? » 2005-04-16 01:25:32

MR,

This not a soapbox for your opinions of the war, or is it because the ancient humans called Mars the God of War !!!!, but I can't see the relationship talking about the issues with earth and the issues that will relate to Mars unless you think we shouldn't go there because we are too young as a race and we might fight over the resources in space like we are doing here. 

I think that we are human beings of earth and second our country affiliation but most people are the other way around and until the human race grows up and works together we will have these growing pains as a young race and hopefully we will come together as one people with different cultural, religious and language difference only. Diversity brings strength to the human race but we are one people of one planet called EARTH.

Also the United Nations should be disbanded and replaced with the United Earth Government - One Planetary Government for One Planet for One People and the current UN Members are Member State Governments for their planetary region on earth, but any issue that relates to the whole planet is directed from the planetary government not from a regional government like the United States. I Hope that we start moving that way in the next fifty years or get there before I die.

Now I am on my soapbox. big_smile

#219 Re: Human missions » Selling out Mars and Science? » 2005-04-15 20:23:35

I love the "crap" that goes on about the motives of the Americans and in particular the President. Every leader has the ups and downs within there life as a leader but the term "LEADER" is where they make a decision to lead a group of people somewhere, and the group picked that person to lead. In a way the world picked the Americans to lead the world, even tho they didn't say anything.

If we don't like there vision for the future then be strong enough and get a stronger leader that is respected throughout the world and then elect them to lead.

If not, then simply stop your "crap" and move on and get positive and work on issues you can effect and change - because one man did change the future - bill gates by being a catalyst - find the next one and the world will change again.

#220 Re: Human missions » Post central for information on CEV III - Continued from previous » 2005-04-13 03:36:05

The CEV Development will fail to meet the requirements for taking humanity into space.  Doesn't have the crew space, the cargo capacity and the ability for large scientific instrument packages for earth to orbit, orbit to moon or orbit to mars or orbit - beyond. I expect a new crew vehicle would be under development within 10 years after the creation of the first working vehicle hitting service.

#221 Re: Human missions » Going to Mars - Am I the only one? » 2005-04-12 16:24:20

However, over the next fifty years of exploration on the Martian surface the landing sites that are explorer sites will turn into outposts for scientists and one or two will convert into settlements greater than 50 personnel, the start of colonization.

We can live in Dome or multi-dome environments with alot of plant life to provide the human centric environment required. At the same time we would start a terraforming process for the whole planet. Other activities would be to explore the planet including building remote relief sites unmanned but could substain human life (like forest cabins ) thus could allow expansion of the human explorers across the surface.

All this depends on the infrastructure around manned and unmanned cargo transports and mineral resource mining on the moon and asteroids and more. The most important resource is people that you could depend on for the development, exploration and innovation of the space infrastructure and colonies on the lunar and martian surfaces.

#222 Re: Human missions » Japan Eyes Future Manned Moon Base, Space Shuttle » 2005-03-28 01:24:03

Austin Stanley,

I agree !!!!

If the space community in Japan sells to the politicans and industrial executives that they could get the country out of the woes and get it focused on an ideal to create a better country, gain wealth for its citizens and grow back to a major world industrial nation and could also rival china in the process, they would do it, if it is only going to cost up to 1% of real budget terms.

Don't think they can't because you would make the same mistake our forefathers in 1930-40's did when they thought Japan wouldn't attack USA because we are world power.  I would also say they are going to the moon for their country and people not for the benefit for humanity or exploring or science but the raw resources and technologies that could flow back to their country.

#223 Re: Human missions » Japan Eyes Future Manned Moon Base, Space Shuttle » 2005-03-27 07:11:03

srmeaney,

What Crap talking about creating a merger between Australia, Japan, Singapore, Indonesia and the Commonwealth !!!!!

Firstly, It won't happen !!!!, because of WW2 and the current issues with Indonesia and world events. Anyhow , If Australia the creators of the micro processor ( then sold it to the Americans ) and many other inventions  and if they wanted to go into space they would, the same for the Japanese and Singapore People.

Anyhow we need to develop new technology and new methods for development, As Albert Einstein said " Imagination is the essences of development of new ideas and technologies or processes" - roughly speaking.

#224 Re: Human missions » Selling out Mars and Science? » 2005-03-21 06:52:09

MarsDog, and SpaceNut,

We need to look forward past the small earth conflicts like the iraq war, or the eu issues or the sa issues or world bank issues or even the UN issues. We need to bring a focus to the future of humanity, to start the journey, not the tour and return to earth, but the exploration and surveying for the future settlements of humanity in our solar system.

The conflicts on earth will sort themselves out over time and if not then we won't be going into space because not human race left to go into space.

#225 Re: Human missions » Colonizing mars one way trip vs short stay - would you go to stay? » 2005-03-20 23:37:45

MR,

I mean to send a small crew for only a "lunar landing style " mission land then return is a "TOURIST" mission to me and many other people. Outposts are permanently manned and expand positions on the surface of Mars.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB