You are not logged in.
I for one am not worried a bit about the future of the US in relation to the rest of the world.
Big picture, neither am I, there merely will be a whole lot of unnecessary suffering caused by our current "borrow & spend" Administration.
Borrow and spend is exactly the same as tax and spend only the taxes are billed to our children.
So when does the civil war start?
Is this relevant?
http://www.detnews.com/2005/autosinside … 7.htm]Ford Motor "reported a full-year 2004 net income of $3.5 billion, seven times its 2003 total, despite a challenging environment that included declining market share and and skyrocketing costs for health care and steel."
Great, right? America'a manufacturers are healthy!
But wait. . .
But Ford's performance was less due to car and truck sales than record results by its financing arm. Ford Motor Credit Company's net income totaled $2.9 billion for the year, up $1.1 billion from 2003.
80% of Ford Motor profits come from finance and insurance. Let that settle in for a minute.
Millions for pork in Ohio? Heh! More of the same ole' same ole' - - you got a speck in your eye, ignore the plank in mine.
Yup. Welfare mothers scam thousands, corporate big-wigs scam billions. Better slap down those welfare queens!
[I might trade missile defense cuts for a few social program cuts, however, since by the time missile defense is operational (if ever) the Chinese won't need to send ICBMs, they will merely need to call our bonds due.]
= = =
Take away power from Congress and give it to our Precious Leader?
Yup. Exactly what Bush wants.
Edit: Just say "No!" - - to fascism!
= = =
Look at a pie chart of the federal budget.
Interest and defense are the biggest items by far. Tell me what to cut and be specific, not vague "efficiency" and "welfare queen" nonsense.
Of course, if we can lie and convince people Social Security is broken, we can cut benefits and solve the problem that way. Standard corporate raider operating procedure. Grab power and steal the pension funds.
Edited By BWhite on 1109522698
DAY IN THE LIFE OF JOE REPUBLICAN
Joe gets up at 6 a.m. and fills his coffeepot with water to prepare his morning coffee. The water is clean and good because some tree-hugging liberal fought for minimum water-quality standards. With his first swallow of water, he takes his daily medication. His medications are safe to take because some stupid commie liberal fought to ensure their safety and that they work as advertised. All but $10 of his medications are paid for by his employer's medical plan because some liberal union workers fought their employers for paid medical insurance - now Joe gets it too.
He prepares his morning breakfast, bacon and eggs. Joe's bacon is safe to eat because some girly-man liberal fought for laws to regulate the meat packing industry.
In the morning shower, Joe reaches for his shampoo. His bottle is properly labeled with each ingredient and its amount in the total contents because some crybaby liberal fought for his right to know what he was putting on his body and how much it contained.
Joe dresses, walks outside and takes a deep breath. The air he breathes is clean because some environmentalist wacko liberal fought for the laws to stop industries from polluting our air.
He walks to the subway station for his government-subsidized ride to work. It saves him considerable money in parking and transportation fees because some fancy-pants liberal fought for affordable public transportation, which gives everyone the opportunity to be a contributor.
Joe begins his work day. He has a good job with excellent pay, medical benefits, retirement, paid holidays and vacation because some lazy liberal union members fought and died for these working standards. Joe's employer pays these standards because Joe's employer doesn't want his employees to call the union. If Joe is hurt on the job or becomes unemployed, he'll get a worker compensation or unemployment check because some stupid liberal didn't think he should lose his home because of his temporary misfortune.
It's noontime and Joe needs to make a bank deposit so he can pay some bills. Joe's deposit is federally insured by the FSLIC because some godless liberal wanted to protect Joe's money from unscrupulous bankers who ruined the banking system before the Great Depression. Joe has to pay his Fannie Mae-underwritten mortgage and his below-market federal student loan because some elitist liberal decided that Joe and the government would be better off if he was educated and earned more money over his lifetime. Joe is home from work.
He plans to visit his father this evening at his farm home in the country. He gets in his car for the drive. His car is among the safest in the world because some America-hating liberal fought for car safety standards. He arrives at his boyhood home. His was the third generation to live in the house financed by Farmers' Home Administration because bankers didn't want to make rural loans. The house didn't have electricity until some big-government liberal stuck his nose where it didn't belong and demanded rural electrification.
He is happy to see his father, who is now retired. His father lives on Social Security and a union pension because some wine-drinking, cheese-eating liberal made sure he could take care of himself so Joe wouldn't have to.
Joe gets back in his car for the ride home, and turns on a radio talk show. The radio host keeps saying that liberals are bad and conservatives are good. He doesn't mention that the beloved Republicans have fought against every protection and benefit Joe enjoys throughout his day.
Joe agrees: "We don't need those big-government liberals ruining our lives! After all, I'm a self-made man who believes everyone should take care of themselves, just like I have."
= = =
Edit to add http://www.dailykos.com/comments/2005/2 … 17/4#4]The missing link
Edited By BWhite on 1109523012
And the US will never be a third world country. The work ethic of Americans (and those who come here to work) now and through history is one of invention, development, and discovery. Most third world countries have just as many resources as the US but look at what they have done for themselves.
Currently, we consume more than we produce. We spend more than we earn. That is unsustainable.
We ARE productive, just not productive enough to sustain our current level of spending.
A global bank in control of a global currency? Time to read our Andrew Jackson biographies.
Cobra wants a global currency? Hmmm....
Sounds socialist.
Actually I'm just saying the US should consider, if the rest of the world wants to follow, great, but it isn't necessary. Particularly being that the Dollar is close to a de facto global currency already, at least for the time being.
besides, how is a global currency socialist? it's not as though I advocated taking it from the producers and giving it away. :;):
Fair enough, socialist may not be accurate. But it got your attention, no?
But, a global currency would signify the coming end of the traditional system of nation-states, excatly as I argued about with Shaun a while back. A global system of largely uniform laws for finance and banking would be an even stronger signal.
Another perspective on http://www.ctrlaltdel-online.com/?t=arc … 02-21]this subject.
It's a cartoon.
http://www.pinr.com/report.php?ac=view_ … _id=1]Link
China will oppose US efforts to "tip over" the Tehran government:
China has also attempted to improve relations with its already-established oil suppliers, such as Saudi Arabia and Iran, by selling them military technology, investing in their industries and energy infrastructure and looking the other way with respect to their human rights records. Currently, China derives 13.6 percent of its oil imports from Iran. In March 2004, China signed a $100 million deal with Iran to import 10 million tons of liquefied natural gas over a 25-year period in exchange for Chinese investment in Iran's oil and gas exploration, petrochemical and pipeline infrastructure. Growing Sino-Iranian relations are undermining U.S. sanctions against Iran. The Bush administration has sanctioned Chinese companies 62 times for violating U.S. or international controls on the transfer of weapons technology to Iran and other states. The U.S. Central Intelligence Agency has submitted a report to the U.S. Congress stating that Chinese companies have "helped Iran move toward its goal of becoming self-sufficient in the production of ballistic missiles." In the ongoing controversy over Iran's uranium enrichment program, China has also opposed bringing the issue before the U.N. Security Council and has even threatened to veto any resolution that is brought against Iran.
How far will China go to prevent US led regime change?
How far will we go to prevent Iranian nuclear weapons?
Potential world wars arise from such questions.
Edited By BWhite on 1109450892
Assume the possibility of the "multi-verse" and Cobra is exactly right.
= = =
If what "it" is is subject to legtimate nuance then what "is" is is perhaps subject to even more legitimate nuance.
Edited By BWhite on 1109449816
*It'll bounce back.
Reminds me (unrelated but similar) of reports we occasionally hear of tomato or lettuce crops being massively wiped out in a certain state or states from flooding or whatever, etc., and how prices will climb sharply (due to shipping costs to your area) and the produce might become scarce as well...and yet there's plenty of that same type of produce in every supermarket in town and the cost is maybe a few pennies higher per pound.
I don't mean to sound flippant and I'm not happy with the economy either...but it'll come back around.
--Cindy
True - but one side efect of that "bounce back" will be a reduction in the US standard of living. Higher interest rates will raise the value of the dollar and reduce our ability to consume goods and services.
A weaker dollar makes it easier to export yet "we" cancel purchases or reduce consumption. A vacation at the Stratford Shakespeaere festival in Ontario will cost my family substantially more this summer than in years past, meaning less money for other stuff, or a different vacation.
The huge unpopped bubble is US debt.
Public, corporate and consumer. Too many families have maxed out their credit cards. Too many families are using debt to fund their monthly budget and that is unsustainable. The adjustment will be very painful.
= = =
Cobra wants a global currency? Hmmm....
Sounds socialist.
Edit: Next, he will want uniform global regulations for banking and finance. I know Citibank wants that.
btw, my favorite anti-globalization story is an anecdote about a Belgian "opponent" of globalization kicking a cash machine in the Buenos Aires airport because it wouldn't dispense dollars and charge the transaction to a VISA card issued by a bank in Zurich .
:;):
Edited By BWhite on 1109449558
http://www.investorsinsight.com/article … 22505]Link
Two years ago 88 cents bought a euro. Today that is over a $1.30.
After all of the "throw clark out the Mars airlock" chatter on this website, it was kinda cool to get a visual image from tonight's Battlestar Galactica episode.
But I suppose 7-11 won't deliver. Here is a blog devoted to the http://members.shaw.ca/byronbussey/biggulp.html]Big Gulp.
Ain't America grand?
Edited By BWhite on 1109370727
http://everquest2.station.sony.com/pizza/]Pizza for Players
There is such as thing as being too deep into the game, and gamers refer to it as 'Evercrack' for a reason. If you have a friend who uses this 'feature' of the game, please, get them help. Or steal their pizza while they're distracted, if you're not into that 'niceness' thing.
This is just awesome, in a twisted trollish sort of way.
Rather like "Who really needs a 128 ounce Super Big Gulp anyway?"
Okay, I invented this one:
Jeepers, creepers, where'd ya find those http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-new … e]freepers. . ."
Frozen methane compounds of some sort?
Would explain the small amounts of methane in the atmosphere...
Frozen methane (clathrates?) without life is still a win because its a valuable resource we can exploit without whining about the microbial beasties we are killing.
Finding a frozen methane deposit is even better than finding water because we can burn it and and get both water and energy. A two for one deal. :;):
= = =
Philosophically I hope for life, strongly.
But no life would make new subdivisions easier to build, without worries from the "save the microbes" committee.
http://www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/science/02 … ut/]30,000 years or 30,000,000 years?
Does it matter? Frozen is frozen, right?
http://olympics.reuters.com/newsArticle … 16]Reuters link
Edited By BWhite on 1109221312
How much would it cost to send a hardened alloy "masonry nail" to impact in the middle of this frozen sea? No heat shield, no parachutes, just slam 50 kg into the ice and take pictures from orbit.
(Edit: If you could hide a rover a safe distance away, the rover could then trundle over to the impact sight and study the ejected material.)
Could Musk's Falcon send a 50 kg dumb projectile to Mars to impact at high velocity?
$10 million? Heck get the WWF (World Wrestling Federation) to pay the whole tab and call it "Mars slamming" - - btw, happy hour arrived early in Chicago today.
Edited By BWhite on 1109197333
Mars, a land of ex-pat's?
![]()
For me, I can see the draw. Mars has so much to offer. But like most things, there is a price. They very things that Rakial mentions are but the tip of the ice-berg of what is lost on Mars. Of course there are martian flavoured substutites, but for myself, I am a creature of habit.
Right now, I find myself in a place without an ocean [sigh], and nothing in this environment here replaces the sight of water as far as the eye can see. The sound and feel of the ocean, or the hot sand burning the naked toes on a beautiful summer day.
Mars will never have that, not in my life time at least. Still, it would be something to at least touch the red planet.
Wake up and smell the sulphur. . .
Who owns the Moon and asteroids? That is the question which will ultimately drive the geopolitics of the next century, or two. Perhaps not ownership, per se, but the authority to draft laws governing ownership.
Which is bound up with the ability to reach them. If the UN works out an elaborate and exceedingly "fair" system for determining ownership, meanwhile China gets out there first and claims everything they can plant a big red flag on we both know what claim will stand.
Space property law will have to be developed along with space settlement, doing it after will lead to... incidents and doing it too extensively beforehand is just an exercise in pointless bureaucracy.
I agree. Read my sig. . .
Politcs and space policy meet?
I wonder what kind of inducement Uncle Sam could offer Russia to stop supporting nuclear reactor activity in Iran?
...
Our acceptance of a global geopolitical order not premised on US hegemony?
Who owns the Moon and asteroids? That is the question which will ultimately drive the geopolitics of the next century, or two. Perhaps not ownership, per se, but the authority to draft laws governing ownership.
This wikipedia quote remains quite droll, concerning reaction to the Pope dividing the Americas between Portugal and Spain, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Tordesillas]link:
The remaining exploring nations of Europe such as France, England, and the Netherlands were explicitly refused access to the new lands, leaving them only options like piracy, unless they (as they did later) rejected the papal authority to divide undiscovered countries. The view taken by the rulers of these nations is epitomised by the quotation attributed to Francis I of France demanding to be shown the clause in Adam's will excluding his authority from the New World.
Edited By BWhite on 1109187919
What proper colonization requires is a goverment representing mankind, or at least one representing the home countries of those going beyond.
A United States of Earth if you will, modeled on the US and EU consitutions, that recognises the colonies as a "nation" that has all rights of all the other nations, in it.
http://en.rian.ru/rian/index.cfm?prd_id … ert=0]This article addresses this point.
"Today we have some new ideas concerning the prospects of Russian-U.S. cooperation in the research of the Moon and Mars, for instance, the development of energy resources of the Moon," Mr. Prikhodko said.
According to him, Vladimir Putin and George Bush are to discuss the issues of space cooperation, in particular, from the point of view of the expansion of the legal basis for the implementation of joint projects.
Why are we getting water from Mars when there is plenty of water rich astroids around that we only have to deliver once?
That boils down to where do we go first.
Is it easier to send 30,000 pounds of methane with re-used RL-10s
refurbished by scientists in their "spare time" or move an asteroid?
Edited By BWhite on 1109183107