New Mars Forums

Official discussion forum of The Mars Society and MarsNews.com

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Announcement: This forum is accepting new registrations via email. Please see Recruiting Topic for additional information. Write newmarsmember[at_symbol]gmail.com.
  1. Index
  2. » Search
  3. » Posts by smurf975

#101 Re: Not So Free Chat » European Cowardice » 2004-08-11 15:05:59

WWII is what now? Sixty years ago?! If you are going to talk about past wars why not talk about the viking invasion of England and France and how the Italians and Germans didn't help them.

Gulf War II is just plainy about that France, Germany and Belgium disagree with the motives for starting it. The Nato, had no problems with helping the US when it entered Afganistan. So it's not just "Americans screw you" as some people like the think, its just they didn't feel Saddam was a threat to western countries.

However I do understand the point that the Germans and French are to easy to sell potentially dangerous technology to dictatorships and other dangerous countries. However don't forget that the US the biggest arms seller of the world.

After Gulfwar I, the US is the biggest supplier of highly advanced weapons to the gulf states. And as you may know some of the gulf states have a lot of internal problems. What if some revolution happens like in Iran? Then those gulf states are at the other side of the line but with newest american weapons technologies.

#102 Re: Terraformation » Can Mars stay terraformed? » 2004-08-10 14:38:06

Ok, I didn't post that particulair article to proove any points on if the war in Iraq is justified or not. I don't even want to talk about it.


But what I wanted to proove is that it isn't voodoo, that is printing dollars if there were no tomorrow as the dollar is the world currency and the USA has a manufacturing (printing) monopoly for it.

#103 Re: Terraformation » Can Mars stay terraformed? » 2004-08-09 12:50:26

There are really some very strange things that people are learning from late night television.  Too many 'Get rich quick' schemes.

Ok I found a link from a reliable source that explains a bit about what I read once. Its]http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1270414,00.html]It's from a big UK national newspaper.

A quote:

In the 70s, the US agreed with Saudi Arabia that Opec oil should be traded in dollars. American governments have since been able to print dollars to cover huge trading deficits, with the further benefit of those dollars being placed in the US money markets. In return, the US allowed the Opec countries to operate a production and pricing cartel.

In 1999, Iran mooted pricing its oil in euros, and in late 2000 Saddam made the switch for Iraqi oil. In early 2002 Bush placed Iran and Iraq in the axis of evil. If the other Opec countries had followed Saddam's move to euros, the consequences for Bush could have been huge. Worldwide switches out of the dollar, on top of the already huge deficit, would have led to a plummeting dollar, a runaway from US markets and dramatic upheavals in the US.

---

If you doubt the source (guardian) then maybe some UK people can say if the guardian is a good source of information or not.

#104 Re: Terraformation » Can Mars stay terraformed? » 2004-08-06 15:29:19

The government can certainly print as much money as it wishes but if it were to actually use that money, print and spend, it would cause out of control inflation and the dollar's value would drop dramatically.  It's an economic nightmare.  The government has strict controls on the money supply and thus it preserves the worth of the American dollar.     

Why do you think they come down so hard on counterfieters?

There is no such thing as free credit, even for a government.

You missed the point, not just print and spend but print and sell to foreigners. The foreigners will then give you all sorts of goodies for those printed pieces of paper that are backed up by the global economy.

But if the global economy wants to use Euros?! Then Americans will have to start working agian for those imported goodies.

#105 Re: Not So Free Chat » 102,004 A.D. - where will we be 100,000 years from now? » 2004-08-06 14:14:35

I'm a person that thinks that Humans like dino's will rule the Earth for many millions of years. There will be tragedies and a lot of deaths but the human’s race will rebound. Now with writing going back to the Stone Age is hardly imaginable for me. As all knowledge is written down. Maybe go back to WWI level of technologies but not further then that.

As a community just needs one bible/thora/koran and someone that can read it and write in the printed languange and you can learn a lot of the ideas / technologies described in those holy books.

Perhaps like the Dino's the humans will go extinct but the dino's left us one thing: The birds. So there will always be humans as there are still (related) life forms on Earth from its earliest days.

Only way for humans to go extinct is to blow up this planet.

---

About humans evolving into maybe something like Home Superior, that’s a big guess. I think by colonizing space (at least this solar system) that could happen faster, as you will get diversitation. But maybe humans are like crocodiles, insects and sharks. They will not change much even over the course of a million years. At this point of time its not needed for the Human to evolve, as it has no real natural predators, so there is no driving force. The weak and the strong humans are as strong when confronted with a wild animal (just need a gun). I think nature doesn’t change that that works.

Yes you have humans that are immune to certain diseases and will live but I don't think immunity systems drive evolutions of species.

#106 Re: Terraformation » Can Mars stay terraformed? » 2004-08-06 13:36:45

I was wondering when insults were going to enter the argument.  That's fine, my type of argument anyway.  It's obvious to me that you have never taken a course in macro-economics and that you are simply repeating what you've heard around the mobile home park. 

Now, no matter what you wish to call it "The Hamilton Banking System"  or "FDR's Newest Deal" or "JFK Prints New Money" the government can get any amount of money rather easily, they just print it, but in order to keep our entire economy from collapsing (read my first link) it must be backed by something other than the government's say so.  It must have a co-signer, just like when your mom had to co-sign for you to get your scooter because your lawn mowing job doesn't pay enough or the government can have a purchaser as in T-bills, bonds...  Now, when the government needs to fund more than it has in it's coffers it usually sells bonds or some other type and at maturity pays back the principal with interest.  It has been doing this for a very long time.  I can see how some of this is confusing for you so I've tried to keep the words as short as possible.  Now you can run around calling this system by fancy names but it is really rather simple.  The government borrows to meet a need then it pays interest on that loan.  It's the same no matter what name you use for it.

I read that the US government in the past and at this moment can easily print new money with no problems. As the dollar as English is the defacto standard for international trade. For instance all countries use dollars to buy oil. That means that there is high demand for the dollar. People on the international market just buy dollars without asking anything in return for it. So as long as people use the Dollar for international trade the Fed can just print dollar bills, as there will always be a demand for more.

For example in the early eighties, when Americans were buying loads of Japanese stuff and paid for it in dollars. So the Americans got their Japanese gadgets but then the Japanese business people were stuck with all these dollars. They can't sell it and buy Yen’s, as the Japanese government wants the Yen lower then the dollar to keep the Japanese products relatively cheaper. So the business people decided to invest in American properties.

So the Americans traded the dollars with the Japanese for goods but got their money back by local investments. So at the end they as a people got it for free.

I can't find the links now but if the Euro is used for International trade then the US is in big trouble. Some people say that the Gulf War II was started for that reason as Saddam wanted Euros for Iraqi oil and Bush & Co were afraid other countries would follow. The Russians were also thinking about it.

#107 Re: Terraformation » Can Mars stay terraformed? » 2004-08-06 13:18:01

Civilians living in domes, caves, and lava tubes.  What joy!  I still do not see it.  The only people who would do such a thing are those who are trying to get away from something and those people are probably not the type you would want to take to mars.  If they can't handle things here how can they handle a long space trip and permanent cabin fever of living inside something (dome, cave, pressure suit) for the rest of their lives?

How does the military or earth security concerns even enter into your reasoning about any mission to mars?  Is mars going to retaliate?  Are the mutants going to protest?  I think you've seen 'Total Recall' too many times.

I consider living in domes like living in Earths big cities such as NY, LA, Mexico City, London, Paris and Cairo. A lot city dwellers from those cities never leave their cities (domes) in their life time.

Myself I never leave populated zones, I like nature but prefer it on TV  tongue

#108 Re: Martian Politics and Economy » Colonial Policy: Direct Rule or Home Rule? » 2004-08-04 13:12:22

So come on, the sun never sets! Let's get the old Empire back together and colonize! Invest in a piece of that Commonwealth.

Question does the President, congress or who ever decides, want to work together closely with Canada, UK, and Australia on a space program?

If so what’s stopping them?

As together they have: 293,027,571 + 32,507,874 + 60,270,708 + 19,913,144 = 405,719,297
406 million people and they are they richest, most developed and also very important the USA, Canada and Australia have huge natural resources.

#109 Re: Martian Politics and Economy » Colonial Policy: Direct Rule or Home Rule? » 2004-08-04 12:51:05

Only it's about more than being able to launch something to Mars. Colonization requires a massive investment of capital to sustain it. Russia, South America and India don't have it at teh moment. China has a ways to go, but maybe in a few decades. The EU might be able to do it, but they have less resources to expend on it than the US and even less will to do it.

Well I'm talking about a fifthy year plan. Just look at how long it took for the Russians and Americans to develop their space plans.

However the Russians and Americans did have the advantage of German scientists they took with them after WWII.

However South American & India may have less will to do so at this moment as they are still fighting starvation and basic stuff such as flooding and a reliable powergrid. Don't know how the Chinese are with this.

This doesn't preclude nations working together, however. EU and Russia maybe. But if we get a good colonization drive going, I actually wouldn't be surprised to see the US and Britain working closely, independent of ESA. Canada and Australia can jump on board as well, giving a huge mass of people, overwhelming financial resources and no serious language barriers, unlike some other potential partnerships.

Look at this what I got from the ESA site:

Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom, together with Canada which is a cooperating country.

This is list of ESA members. So I think you are to late with Canada and the UK. Australia could be a swinger between the ESA and NASA.

Also English is not a problem for most educated people in Europe. The French are just stuborn. But I think almost all European rocket scienctist can read/write and talk good english. Well I think they have no choice as most high tech documentation is in English.

#110 Re: Martian Politics and Economy » Anarchism - Anything goes » 2004-08-04 12:35:06

Isn't anarchism, as political (contradiction in terms?) about the highest degree of personal freedom, but combined with getting along, and working together with fellow humans?

One of the most hilarious parts of Bowling for Columbine was when a girl was suspended (or in some way punished) for trying to form an "anarchist club"....that's right folks...an "anarchist club" at her school.

Yes, anarchy is silly and impossible. If earth government declares that "Mars will be an anarchic society!" then it means they just choose not to acknowledge the government that WILL form there. Humans join in packs and organize better together - we are used to it since we are doing it for thousands of years. Declaring something an anarchy is just denying to yourself the organization that exists there.

Isn't anarchism, as political (contradiction in terms?) about the highest degree of personal freedom, but combined with getting along, and working together with fellow humans?

I think this should be true in reality for any society!

---

I don't see anarchy as a government less political system. It’s just a lean and mean national government. So just foreign affairs / international trade and defense (military) and perhaps big projects such as dam building and space program. Something that will affect all citizens.

All the other stuff is done by local governments. And those (state/ provinces) governments will again be limited. However they will be able to raise taxes for infrastructure, healthcare, police and other stuff.

Basically the people will have the power not the burocracy

#111 Re: Martian Politics and Economy » Colonial Policy: Direct Rule or Home Rule? » 2004-08-04 12:27:04

I believe that the amount of graft or corruption found in a municipal government of any size is more directly attributable to the civic culture of the society at large, than to population alone.

Mars will someday be home to both large cities and small towns, in my opinion. The big cities will enjoy more prosperity than most smaller settlements, due to much greater economic activity. They will also have greater cultural possibilities, due to the larger concentration of diverse groups of people.

More crime? Sure. More corruption? Sure, but probably no more per capita than Euthenia. But also more jobs, more possibilities for real-life (NOT just virtual) cultural enrichment, and more hope to climb up the socioeconomic ladder for the ordinary Joe and Jane of Mars.

You have a point but also think that in this modern society distances matter less.

If you set up settlements with wireless communications and use for instance microwave to supply energy. You basically have a remote community that is fully in contact with the rest of Mars.

Also you will need to invest in public transport such as trains. What is stopping trains on Earth from going faster then 300 miles/hour is air resistance. As Mars has almost no air your can make trains go as fast as planes and it will be cheaper then air transportation on Earth. So moving people and cargo over great distances is no problem on Mars as the public transport system is very fast.

#112 Re: Martian Politics and Economy » Colonial Policy: Direct Rule or Home Rule? » 2004-08-04 12:19:06

I think that if you look at the nations / communities that are able to get humans on Mars in lets say 50 years, saying that American people will make up most of the population is untrue.

These are the countries / communities that I think that should be able to get something to Mars in the next 50 years:

1.    USA
2.    Russia
3.    ESA (Europeans)
4.    South Americans (Centered around Brazil)
5.    Indians
6.    Chinese

If you look at this list, all of these have greater populations then the US except for Russia. As most citizens of the respective nations are happy on Earth and like it, I will guess only about 3% of each nations populations actually want to move to Mars. 3% of Europeans, Indian, Chinese or Brazilians is much much more then 3% of the US population.

The original US colony will be swamped by other peoples. However English may be the Martian language.

#113 Re: Martian Politics and Economy » Will Mars revitalize Terran society? » 2004-08-03 16:02:43

You can solve this by importing people from poorer nations but if you don't want to loose your heritage as those people will make other people of another culture its not recommended. And perhaps they will also send a part of their wages to their homecountries which is a loss for the American economy.

Yes, but it's not necessarily a loss to the Marsian economy.

In examining the American example, it's important to know two things:

My Cajun grandmother and my Spanish aunt are both laughing at the suggestion that early cultural influences are obliterated by later influences,

and

The primary influence on US society today has nothing to do with who came out first in the settlement of the country.  The primary influence is the citizens of the United States of America.

Yes almost all immigrants want to become Americans and follow the American dream. What makes immigrants in the US adapt to American ways and standards is unknown to me. As in other countries they will form a closed group and keep their native countries habits. Although Americans do accept things from their native cultures if its interesting such as food.

But America is just a country and Mars is planet. Also if you would have had a very large concentration of Spanish or French people in the US back in the days, I'm sure their native cultures would have been more influentual.

So I think its imposible to have just one culture on Mars like in the USA. That is if there are many people of the same culture there.

#114 Re: Martian Politics and Economy » Will Mars revitalize Terran society? » 2004-08-03 15:47:05

Quote Smurf975 Aug 03 2004, 17:19

But still this isnt all. like on Earth the culture that dominates is not really the richest(else the Saudis and Kuwaitis would) but those that in some way appeal to to allotof different peoples and are advanced and have the best schools and personal technologies and freedoms

Using the Saudis as an example they are not the richest there upper class is but the majority of the population are poor and undereducated. It is for this reason and the lack of trust the Saudis upper class have for there own citizens that they employ so many foreigners to do the jobs they need. This means the Saudis are consumers just not producers and everything that they need is purchased and when the oil runs out.

A succesful society must be a general society and is capable of reacting to new enviroments allowing advantage to be taken. Also the society must be of a sufficient size to allow enough trained population to allow it to be a success. And it must stay the course. Holland did have colonies in the Americas and also in Africa and a lot in Asia, but with trouble at home and with a political union with Britain it decided to do away with its smaller American colonies, giving them to Britain.

I know about the situation in those mid east oil producing countries. But I was talking about the number you would see if would surf to the CIA world fact book.

But then, you still have swiss and luxembourg and perhaps other countries (Hong Kong and Singapore come to mind) but culturaly they are not that important. Although they do have higher standards of living then most powerfull and influential nations.

#115 Re: Martian Politics and Economy » Will Mars revitalize Terran society? » 2004-08-03 15:40:16

Ok, I just wanted to expand on what I thought was a rather thoughtprovoking statement. . . .

I wrote:
In a democracy, without open means of power, stability relies instead on control of mind and spirit. It moves inside the flesh of people. That's the dead end of democracy as well as its logical conclusion.

Yes; what if the government is not an democracy?  The will of the french people did some pretty bad stuff to themselves in the french revolution.  The American Government is more of a republic than a democracy (Senators where chosen by the states until fairly recently) and is made in such a way that protects the people from themselves.  If a "true" democracy exsisted, then it would quickly distingrate from lack of order and become more or less anarchy.  Not everyone can run a government, and not everyone should have something to do with government.  For example, if you rode a bus, would you trust just anyone to be your driver?  What if a suicidal drunk wanted to drive?  Of course it would limit your freedom to drive buses to implement rules pertaining as to who could drive your bus.  But the alternative to that would be worse. 

Obuiously, if a person really, really wanted to become a bus driver, he/she could simply take a class, recieve certification and drive away.  But the rules ensure that the interest is genuine, and the ablity conssumerate with that interest.

Sounds like what the communist used to say when asked why they didn't have free elections in their country. "The people are not able to decide for them selfs whats good."

I find that so much crap.

---

#116 Re: Martian Politics and Economy » Will Mars revitalize Terran society? » 2004-08-03 15:30:36

In a democracy, without open means of power, stability relies instead on control of mind and spirit. It moves inside the flesh of people. That's the dead end of democracy as well as its logical conclusion.

Isn't democracy just dictatorship by the majority and fasisme dictatorship by the minority?

#117 Re: Martian Politics and Economy » Will Mars revitalize Terran society? » 2004-08-03 15:19:39

Don't forget that non western families tend to have more children. However this can due to wealth or the lack of it.

And if they get out there before us in large numbers we're in trouble, from a West-centered demographic and social standpoint. It's ours to lose for the moment.

Well yes it could be a problem but still doesn't mean that those cultures will dominate.

Lets say the Chinese will engage in a Sjovet, Maoist style of five year plan. Which goals is to send 10.000 Chinese to Mars to start a colony.

They will use forced labour to realize this plan and millions of Chinese will die due to this and also due to fact that all resources of the nations are diverted to this ambitious project.

They are sucessful and the Chinese on Mars live happy. But what happens after this? The country is now like in state after a huge war. They can't do anything anymore.

While the other countries were more modest and first designed cheap space vehicles that can be mass produces and eventually ship millions of people to Mars. Its like saying in 1497 that the Chinese will colonize America using rafts. Also didn't most Americans come to the US using steam powered ships while the colony was long known?

But still this isn't all. Like on Earth the culture that dominates is not really the richest (else the Saudis and Kuwaitis would) but those that in some way appeal to allot of different peoples and are advanced and have the best schools and technolgies and personal freedoms. But also just why does everyone all over the world buy American music?

#118 Re: Martian Politics and Economy » Will Mars revitalize Terran society? » 2004-08-03 15:16:00

ISS/STS allows America to defer thinking about such issues and so long as we spend all our space budget on ISS/STS and robots, the Russians, French and Chinese can defer their anxiety about our lead in space.

I guess with the French you mean the ESA??

Well I hate to break it to you then but the Canadians (your close neighbours) are closely working together with the ESA on future projects.

#119 Re: Martian Politics and Economy » Will Mars revitalize Terran society? » 2004-08-03 14:59:08

I think that literacy is a developed nation such as the US will not change much. As I read once that the government of the US actually doesn't want a 0-1% unemployment rate as this will just drive up the wages, cost of living and the US will loose it competition posistion with other nations.

High School dropouts are needed as who will clean the offices of the upper middle class, who will work at the supermarkets?

You can solve this by importing people from poorer nations but if you don't want to loose your heritage as those people will make other people of another culture its not recommended. And perhaps they will also send a part of their wages to their homecountries which is a loss for the American economy.

---

Actually I prefer the Chinese system of modernizing the financiel system over the Russian shock plans. Actually I kind of regret that the Russians kicked Gorbatjov out like that. Not that I surported communisme, its just that I think gradual changes are better then fast onces. I think the Russians should have had more patients but they all wanted to drink coca cola and eat a hamburger now. I think this fast change has already it negative effects and can get worse.

#120 Re: Martian Politics and Economy » Will Mars revitalize Terran society? » 2004-08-03 14:55:10

Don't forget that non western families tend to have more children. However this can due to wealth or the lack of it.

But Catholics and Muslims (not sure about hindus) should not be affected by greater personal wealth when it comes to family size (in general of course).

#121 Re: Martian Politics and Economy » Will Mars revitalize Terran society? » 2004-08-03 14:37:14

And whoever gets a foothold first will disproportionately influence that expansion. Whoever colonizes Mars first sets the mold for spacefaring humanity. That alone should be enough reason not to delay.

I disagree as how many french speakers are in the french region of the the US? How many dutch speakers are a great influence to the US?

Even now spanish is getting more and more popular.

---

Being first means nothing as you can also see from the space race, first sattelite (how many actually are russian?), first in space, first on the moon.

First colony, meaning babies.

The wabbit theory of evolutionary conflict.

Agian I disagree as the French, Dutch and especially the native americans made babies.

Its more who is more advanced (can ship people the fastest and cheapest and be comfortable on the colony), has the higher birth rate, lowest infancy death rate and has overcrowded nations with bad economics and politics (mexico, india and china or old europe "like" which made your ancestors move to the new world)

#122 Re: Martian Politics and Economy » Will Mars revitalize Terran society? » 2004-08-03 14:22:16

And whoever gets a foothold first will disproportionately influence that expansion. Whoever colonizes Mars first sets the mold for spacefaring humanity. That alone should be enough reason not to delay.

I disagree as how many french speakers are in the french region of the the US? How many dutch speakers are a great influence to the US?

Even now spanish is getting more and more popular.

---

Being first means nothing as you can also see from the space race, first sattelite (how many actually are russian?), first in space, first on the moon.

#123 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Electromagnetic propulsion - Gets more funding » 2004-07-28 07:21:02

So what happens when the projectile bursts out of the end of the vaccum containment vessle? Would the projectile just destroy itself on the end wall causing the muzzle to explode, essentially no projectile shot further than the muzzle. Or would the projectile burst forth causing sudden reaction with air and a supersonic shock wave, destroying the projectile as it exits the muzzle.

Well at least it doesn't then destroy the multi million dollar costing gun each time you want to fire it during testing.

But perhaps heating the air just outside the gun, so that the air is thinner and slowly gets thicker until 1 atomosphere the farther away (talking about feet/meters). Or else ionizing the air and atrack the air with an anode and a kathode. Ultimately I think of something like a plasma gas just outside the barrel that is thinner then normal air and will also form a layer/coating) arround the moving projectile for a distance (several feet/meters) and be worn of slowly (by friction) and then the projectile hits the normal air density.

#124 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Electromagnetic propulsion - Gets more funding » 2004-07-27 09:57:09

Attempts to achieve the higher speed resulted in a supersonic shockwave inside the barrel causing the gun barrel to explode.

Why didn't they use a vacuum in the barrel? I'm assuming that the guns and ammo don't need any chemical reactions.

#125 Re: Martian Politics and Economy » Anarchism - Anything goes » 2004-07-22 16:06:37

Its not Communism nor Capitalism but doing what works for the community.

Its more like federalisme taken to the extreme.

  1. Index
  2. » Search
  3. » Posts by smurf975

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB