You are not logged in.
NASA came up with something better than both Orion and gas-core propulsion concepts - ACMF (antimatter catalyzed microfission/fusion), which is sort of "Orion without bombs" and has a much smaller minimum size.
Instead of using chemically-imploded nuclear bombs, you wrap a thin layer of uranium over a deuterium core, fire them out the back, and hit it with a fraction of a nanogram of antimatter, as antimatter will spark a nuclear reaction in even the smallest pieces of uranium. The majority of the actual power comes from the fusion of deuterium, however, not the fissioning uranium.
The antimatter needed is within the puny antimatter generation capabilities of today, and the total weight of the system is about the same as a nuclear rocket, but with Orion-or-better ISPs and plenty of thrust.
Plus, you don't need to build the Battlestar Galactica to go cruising around the solar system.
Again, I think some people are simply rotten, vicious predators. They see someone weaker than they, or vulnerable, and they attack.
I believe that a lot of people, deep down in their heart, do not or cannot believe this, and that mental blindness is at the root of much judicial stupidity.
Possibly, though I get the impression Palpatine wasn't planning on keeling over in the foreseeable future. What could be an interesting possibility though is the rise of a military junta, either as an internal coup or more likely resulting from Palpatine's death. As might have been mentioned earlier in the thread, if they at least partially control the information transfer over such distances they can spin it however they choose, most people would accept it. Grand Moff so and so is head of the new Imperial Council, okay. Whatever.
What the hell is a Moff anyway, where did that come form?
On a related note, Palpatine had legitamacy. He was elected, he was given sweeping powers by an elected Senate, he could be seen as operating fully within the legal confines of the Republic. A hand-picked successor would lack that shroud of legality.
Palpatine certainly wasn't planning on keeling over anytime soon, although dialog in the original trilogy and in this upcoming movie hint that extending their own lifepsan was something the Sith wanted. However, it's quite clear that Vader was well known to be the Emperor's right hand throughout the movies, and he'd have a certain legitimacy from that. That, and he'd simply crush any other pretender to the throne.
If we accept Vader's statement at face value. Which incidentally we have no real reason not to, in both the rrequels and the original trilogy the Sith seem to tell the truth more frequently than the Jedi.
This has always amused me. It's so true! The other funny thing is, their philosophy makes them much more suited to the Jedi's previous role as galactic policemen than the Jedi were themselves. Perhaps the wrong side won the original Sith Wars, way back when. The Jedi would be a few people out in the boonies meditating on the interconnectedness of all things, and the Sith would be crushing all threats to the Republic...
I'm ressurrecting this thread due to the approach of Episode III and the very soon official release of the novelization of same, which will be out next week. Well, that and because it's an interesting topic...
After looking back at the two prequels, and also having looked at the original trilogy, I've decided that the Empire is flat-out the best choice, for several reasons.
First we will dispose of the ones we already know of: first off, representative democracy on a galactic scale is pretty much useless. Second off, the likely consequences of the disintegration of the Empire would be a Hobbesian jungle war of individual planets and small confederations a galaxy wide. Third, as evidenced by Luke's wish to go to the Empire's Academy, Lando's admission that the Empire had not previously hassled Cloud City, and the fact that everyone seems to be armed indicates that the Empire isn't terribly repressive. And, BTW, the Empire had a clear system of succession in mind, to keep infighting to a minimum. It's quite clear that Palpatine had in mind a 'Sith Empire', remembering the rule of 'there are always two, a master and an apprentice'. The apprentice, Darth Vader, would succeed Palpatine and groom some person gifted in the force as the next heir apparent.
However, there's another two reasons for the Empire to be the better choice:
First off, there are counter-elements at work in the Empire, that is, factions willing to depose the Emperor. We know this because it's a major plot point - the climactic scene of "The Empire Strikes Back" where Vader tells Luke he's his father, that they can overthrow the Emperor and 'rule the galaxy as father and son'. A Vader/Luke led Empire is going to be qualitatively different from a Palpatine-led Empire, I don't think I need to elaborate on that.
The second, and more amazing one, is that the Empire would be - and this will sound counterintuitive, but consider the facts - a more humane and moral government.
Wait, the original 'Evil Empire' better than the Republic?
Consider the things going on in the first movie: We see slavery on Tatooine and crime lords being local celebrities at races. Under the Empire, during 'Return of the Jedi', the Hutt crime lords instead seem to be hiding out in the middle of nowhere in some dingy hellhole of a fortress. There is no mention of slavery - if nothing else Darth Vader, Dark Lord of the Sith, is inclined to homicidal venegance and would have dealt with the slave trade... personally.
So really, we can blame Luke for being a hotheaded young fool and not taking the opportunity given him at Bespin to effect a relatively peaceful change, merely by changing his affiliation from the Jedi to the Sith and trading one spoon-bending tradition for another. He almost certainly would have been able to save his friends as well, although he didn't know this - apparently, from the novelization, Vader/Anakin was able to get such amnesty/protection for Padme Amidala from Palpatine.
Don't try to learn me the meaning of this french origin word.
It might have one meaning in French and the English one might derive from it, but the French meaning isn't the English meaning. Words change when they get moved from one language to another; 'populace' is a straight across synonym for 'population' in English.
Trebuchet's Log, Addendum
I believe that Cobra has entered the bar incognito. I'm not quite certain I believe my eyes. He's pulling the old "Conneticut Yankee" routine, you know, where King Arthur and The Boss wander around unknown. I'm almost bored enough to see if it's really him and maybe follow him. The only thing preventing me from doing so is the likelihood of some sort of general war being the end result.
Still...
Ahh, some sort of war would undoubtedly break out anyways. I'll leave a lil' note for the staff to cover for me. I'm taking a rifle and a vacation.
I don't say that, I think that CC, you and the capital punishment supporters are not fully logically coherent when saying :
A) Deliberately killing someone is a crime
B) Peoples can gather and decide to kill a criminalLogical incoherence are other words for "absurdity" or "nonsense". My brain refuses nonsenses.
This is stronger an agument to me than moral or ethic ones
Logical does not mean valid, it merely means that it follows from the premises. I reject premise A, and believe that intentional killing is not always a crime. Therefore, there is not any logical incoherence, therefore, it is not nonsense. I presume that CC and Shaun Barrett have similar thought processes, namely, they do not view killing as a priori illegal, but something that depends on the circumstances in which the death took place.
Trebuchet's Log, May 8, 2103
The force sent to fulfill, as best we could, our mutually incompatible treaty obligations have returned. I am authorizing a daylong 'Happy Hour' for the good of Mars, and am waiving the cover fee, although I suppose the Cult Of Vlork will continue to extract donations to the faith by holding people upside down by their ankles and shaking loose change.
No, minature cows.
Some ranchers on earth have been breeding the bovine equivalent of the chihuahua here on earth for unfathomable reasons, but it's a godsend for a Mars mission. They look like normal cows, produce milk and steaks (smaller steaks, but hey...) that taste the same, but are a heck of a lot smaller, and hence consume a lot less stuff as well.
"Moo" beats "Baa" any time of the week for me.
Trebuchet, having returned to the TempleBar after the emergency mission to Hellas, is too busy organizing a victory parade/party/kegger celebrating and commemerating those who rescued and helped their fellow Martians to catch wind of any incipient hostilities between the forces of Lord Vlork of Olympia and the Marineris Colony.
It would, in fact, not be until noonish the next day that the Chrysians monitoring the steady flow of radio transmissions, satellite data, and reports from TempleBar agents bothered to hand Trebuchet and other unofficial rulers of the Chrysian colony a report on the incident.
Which left the Chrysians in a serious conundrum: they had an old treaty of friendship with Lord Vlork, and a newer nonaggression pact with the Marineris colonists. Finally, after several shots of liquor, they reached a decision: They would not *attack* the new colony, per se, but they would hold an uninvited party on the base.
Not recognizing a crowd of drunk, but almost unarmed Martians as a threat, the automated robot guardians of the new colony did not put up a fight, and the skeleton detail overlooking the base couldn't keep out the mob of gate crashers.
Thus, for the second time, much damage was done to the main dome, although this time the airlocks were left intact and the life support system was undamaged. Still, several computers were down, graffiti and garbage was strewn everywhere, and base security was found unconscious, hung over, and with panties on their heads when the main force returned.
The Party Warriors had done their job.
I like to think I'd balance it out by reducing penalties on many lesser crimes, prison is such an overused form of punishment/correction and is currently applied to many crimes for which it is completely innapropriate.
Correct, there's a lot of crimes where IMHO the punishment should be something along the lines of "pick trash up for four hours a day for the next few years" or something instead of "Let's throw you in a big cage with a bunch of hardened felons for a few years and see if that improves you any".
My impression is that these elites have come to wield influence out of proportion to their numbers and that their opinion has come to count more than the opinion of the majority. This kind of elitism is gravely dangerous to democracy and, at least in Australia, has led to a judiciary out of touch with mainstream opinion about crime and punishment.
I object very strongly to this and I wonder if anyone else here feels the same? ???
I've heard this song before, and sang a few verses as well. ^_^
I have a "richly deserving few" list of my own and I suspect that, if Treb and I sat down over a quiet drink, we could come up with a mutually satisfactory selection of crimes attracting that penalty.
It would probably be something like 'multiple premeditated murders seperated in time' for starters, with a hard look at additional factors such as brutality/sadisticness of the murder, whether sexual abuse occurred in commission of the crime, etc. The guy who kills five people in a shootout at the bank is not in this category, even if he's robbed banks before (he should be locked up for a really long time, possibly life, depending on what happened, but he's not in this 'richly deserving few' category). Examples of people meeting the criteria, for whatever reasons, would be Jeffery Dahmer, Ted Bundy, that BTK serial killer, and the like. I'm uncertain if Shaun Barrett, being in Australia, knows who I'm talking about, but they were unusually brutal serial killers. I'm certain Australia has had one or two over the years.
Sometimes, retaliation is appropriate and neccessary, DonPanic. That would be why I called my stance "the richly deserving few" approach.
Technically speaking, the commandment is "Thou shalt not MURDER", which is a very important distinction.
However, as applies to the death penalty, I'd say I have a 'richly deserving few' policy on it (on Earth, in normal circumstances - early colonization of Mars is another issue). Basically speaking, you have some crimes which are so horrible that only death is an appropriate punishment, and you also have some criminals who would probably generate additional deaths even if left alive in prison.
The latter category, in case you're wondering, is the Osama types, generally terrorists, whose imprisonment carries a high risk of followers/whatever staging a hostage situation to try to win release or something. The former category is for people like the serial child rapist/murderer in Iran who was recently hung.
DonPanic's solitary confinement exists in the US, actually, for really nasty criminals.
Trebuchet's Log, May something-or-other, 2103
The rescue mission was a success, although inhaled glo-rox fragments apparently create bizzare ideations and hallucinations, like everything else on Mars. One of the Hellas colonists we rescued here believed that some of the rescue team medics were old Star Trek characters. I didn't even know we had Star Trek on Mars, though upon further reflection the TempleBar does pirate every TV channel known to man and a vigorous bootlegging industry that would be illegal if we had those pesky things called 'law' and 'government' around. Come to think of it, we never did get around to creating a government. I suppose the neccessary evil was more evil than it was neccessary after all.
It has turned out that glo-rox are a useful phosphorus ore, although that 'randomly explodes' problem is going to be a pain. The new colonists are conducting scientific tests to determine the exact trigger of glo-rox explosions. And my team has been conducting tests as well - someone released tilapia into the growing Hellas Sea and we've been trying different batter recipies to fry them.
Fish and chips for one and all! That way we don't have to listen to random screams of "rabbit eaters!"
Trebuchet's Log, Addendum
Just making myself a note to build the ironworks someplace way the hell away from the TempleBar, perhaps in some godforsaken crater. Our main trade is entertainment, tourism (such as exists on Mars) and foodstuffs, don't need metalworking mucking the place up.
We now have a nonaggression pact with the newcomers and the old one with Lord Vlork. This will make us the Switzerland of Mars, neutral, rich, and... hmm, perhaps we're more like the Casablanca of Mars, given the boozy atmosphere and fights. The chanting cultists give it an Indiana Jones type atmosphere, though.
Hmm.
Reminder to self, see what sort of video equipment we have back in the TempleBar and think about filming a movie. Cheap export for earth means more money. Perhaps we could purchase some useful earth equipment, like a US Congressman or two.
Trebuchet's Log, May 2, 2103
Repairs have been made to the damaged rovers and the joint relief missions should arrive by nightfall.
Trebuchet's Log, May 1, 2103
The first traffic accident on Mars has occured today, as we unexpectedly ran into one of the rovers that the new colonists had sent north when navigating the canyons. What are the odds that such a thing would happen? Luckily, no one was killed, and the rovers are only mildly damaged, but I can't believe they have the gall to accuse us of being drunk just because we painted our rovers to look like beer cans.
In any case, this "Colonel Barkley" seems reasonably peaceful enough, although with our only standards of comparison being Lord Vlork's cultists our perception might be a bit skewed. In any case, we've decided to start trade talks here, since neither party is willing to leave a damaged rover behind.
Trebuchet's Log, April 28 2103
I have recieved word that a subterranean explosion had been detected in the Hellas cavern complex. I've ordered the NIMF diverted from the milk run to the Sergeant Pepper to bring a trained paramedic over to the new colonists' base to pick up any people they might have who can help in a rescue operation. If nothing else we will at least recover their bodies. I'm leaving the TempleBar in the hands of one of the waitresses and leading another relief team in our beer-can shaped rovers. We had a surprising number of volunteers for this mission...
Whatever.
Trebuchet's Log, March 39 2103, Entry Two
It seems that the new arrivals might not be as hostile as previously expected. We also have information that the Hellas colonists have mistaken my drunken ramblings for informed policy. A diplomatic team is being NIMFed out to the Sergeant Pepper to offer our peace offering. I am informed that they are woefully understocked with potato chips, pretzels, and beer, without which no civilized society can survive. I hope that they accept our peace offering in the spirit in which it was intended. We need unity in the face of the threat from Earth.
Note to self, it might be cheaper to establish a salt works there, too, rather than refining it from dried lake beds hereabouts.
And Dook, your description of the suffering of so many people in this world, especially the children, can hardly fail to move us all to heartfelt pity. Believe me, I do feel the pain.
However, I'm hoping that stem-cell research which doesn't rely on 'killing Peter to save Paul' will generate all the benefits we're looking for without compromising our humanity.
Yes, this sums up my hopes as well. I was pissed that Dook would use such a... well, cheap shot, saying that I didn't understand or know, when I did. There just happens to be a line in my mental sand I won't cross to cure those things.
Trebuchet stared, as did everyone else in the bar, at the stranger who rolled into town. He could have sworn a tumbleweed rolled by outside.
"We don't get many strangers here, stranger," Trebuchet said, before thinking about how awkward that sounded. "Beer we have... salted peanuts we don't."
"Got some mighty fine potato chips, though," one of the regulars said.
Trebuchet slid across a mug of Phobos Red to the newcomer and a bowl of chips. "On the house", he said, figuring that it was easier to get information on the new colonists from a drunk... whatever the hell that was... than otherwise.
...
I'm definitely not responding to such emotional ranting, especially when you don't know a damn thing about the person on the other side of the monitor.
EDIT: Perhaps it's better to say that I have sufficient personal experience with genetic disorders to be singularly unshamed and unmoved by your last posts, and leave it at that.
I'm having a difficult time believing that you could possibly be missing Cindy's point, but to my astonished eyes this certainly seems to be the case.
Well if you believe that such a small piece of life has a right to exist then never take penecillin. And don't eat anything but dirt, somehow removing the organic matter.
Those things aren't genetically human, and wouldn't grow into a human, which is her point about the fertilized eggs.
Also go up to the next Down's Syndrome child you see and explain to them that a single cell, one women discharge into toilets often, has the same rights as they do. Try not to point your finger at them when you do this.
Assuming that the cell was fertilized, I'd say, yes, it does have the exact same right to life that they have. Said egg might have some fatal genetic defect which kills it in vitro, or it might never implant, or it might miscarriage for some other reason, but I could be hit by lightning tomorrow, that's just life. We shouldn't end it ourselves.
In my opinion if a fertilized cell does not wish to be used to cure genetic disease, all it has to do is say so.
OK, I suppose we could use people with severe mental retardation as test subjects, as long as they can't communicate, it's ok, right? ??? (I know you aren't in favor of this, I'm just showing the folly of this line of 'argument')
The point Cindy and I were making is that YOU SET THE BAR AS LOW AS POSSIBLE. You don't know when human life begins, nobody does, as this argument we've been having shows, so you simply play it safe. Life begins at conception, not because we know, but because it's the safest definition.