New Mars Forums

Official discussion forum of The Mars Society and MarsNews.com

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Announcement: This forum is accepting new registrations via email. Please see Recruiting Topic for additional information. Write newmarsmember[at_symbol]gmail.com.

#76 Re: Not So Free Chat » Suppose settlement was impossible - Do you still favor human missions? » 2004-03-26 13:22:15

If we can't bear children safely on Mars, then we can't do it anywhere else, either.

"safely" :
the first settlers might have a higher abortion rate due to all kind of abnormalities and pregnacy related problems. We had a thread about that last year, where I have posted some references to zero g effects on embryogenesis experiments (with animals of course, through I am curious to know if some unreported russian experiments have involved pregnant women) aboard space stations like MIR.
Nothing is known about 0.38g, since in zero-g ISS, zero-science is done on that issue (for hundreds time the buck) and we have to wait until the Mars gravity experiment is done. That just involves a centrifuge in space, to make the zero g, with cages for the mice and the same centrifuge on Earth, to take into account the effects of the coriolis force versus the effect of the lower gravity on the mice embryogenesis. But again, that's just mice, not human. So going back to topic, human pregancy on Mars might not be as "safe" as on Earth, but, what's gonna be safer on Mars anyway ?

Otherwise you are right, I don't see a better place in the solar system than Mars. Mars or nothing.

#77 Re: Not So Free Chat » Suppose settlement was impossible - Do you still favor human missions? » 2004-03-26 12:38:16

Suppose we learn that humans are biologically unable to bear children away from the Earth - - I do not believe this myself - - yet I propose we take this as a fixed assumption for purposes of this thread.

yes you're right, bearing children to term might be difficult, but probably not impossible since experience in zero g with vertebrates showed that it can be done. Obviously, 0.38g is better than zero g, so I don't worry much.

It will happen however. Providing we are not running full speed towards WWIII, providing mother Earth still wants to support us for the next decades without too much complaining, providing Mars is finally reached by men and women...so here we are. Given the lenght of the trip, and difficulties to come, I think a base with at least a 2/3 years rotation crew is better than a 3 months stay. 2 or 3 years, that's long enough to create men/women relationship and unless antifecondation treatments and other "tools" are imposed, you will get that : a first pregnancy. We might all be alive when that happen.

But If Mars forbids human pregnancy, I think human will leave and forget Mars.
But that won't happen. The Human body is very adaptable, don't forget that hominids are very recent in term of evolution. The worst that could happen : oversized embryo due to some kind of accelerated growth in lower gravity, or the reverse, small sized embryo looking like a premature, while still at term, will just require a C section, while In the latter case, I would probably choose to let it go naturally, if it's longer than 9 months that's no big deal. So, in a long term martian base, surgeons and pediatricians will be required.

#78 Re: Not So Free Chat » Appropriate Topics: On War and Politics » 2004-03-26 10:03:40

"We know that there are unknow known but we don't know how unknown exactly they are"
Donald Rumsfeld, or something like that.

But now, we know :

[http://deadbrain.co.uk/news/article_2004_01_04_5421.php]http://deadbrain.co.uk/news/article_2004_01_04_5421.php

#79 Re: Life on Mars » If life really was discovered on Mars - how would people react? » 2004-03-26 07:29:51

My very personnal opnion about religion, specifically the miracles attributed to Jesus or others, is that there is not two worlds, one with physical laws for humans and another one with diferent physical laws that allow to walk on the water or multiplying breads for example.
The most anti-physical miracle, IMO again, is ressucitation.
You realize that if you accept the theory of evolution, life on earth has appeared ONCE (well, maybe after different attemps, but say 100 millions years after the first genesis ) so ressucitation is like a second genesis. Once your dead you're dead, you are not different from a stone, making a stone alive is impossible.
So either these miracles are "symbolistics" stories of a more modest reallity (or jsut big lies), or, since their is ONE universe with physical laws followed by everybody on earth from Britney Spear to Jesus Christ, that means these physical laws are either incomplete or are still approximating the real physical laws, laws that allow miracles.
stupid ? not quite. Think about the recently discovered quantic and thermodynamic laws. There are a little bit counterintuitive, it is often said. For example, the modern interpretation of Ice is that ice is a crystal of water molecules. That means the molecules are positioned in a crytalline network and vibrate sligtly in their position, but don't "move randomly" like in liquid water or in a steam.
Now the notion of "moving randomly" is a thermodynamic statistical interpretation of a macroscopic system. In quantic dynamic, at the scale of the atome or single molecule, it is not possible to have both the exact position and the exact speed of a given atom.
If you put a pot full of water on the fire, the molecular agitation and speed of the water molecules will increase, until the water starts to boil. Until the water boils : that's what you expect. However, if one day it happens that this water actually transforms into ice, you would say it is IMPOSSIBLE, or it is a lie, unless Jesus Christ did it, in such a case you would then say it is a miracle. But actually it is not impossible, it is just UNLIKELY, as the mecules of water are randomly moving, there is still a chance, very little, but different of zero, that all the molecules of water in that pot on the fire, would move in a position like an ice crystal, and move synchroneously for a fraction of second, so that the water in the pot on the fire, instantaneously, would freeze. The more you heat the pot, the more it is unlikely that the water freezes. For practical matters, we would say it is impossible, but in theory it is not, only the odds are lower and lower.
Now the "miracle" takes another interpretation : it is just something very unlikely, but not impossible. No physical laws are broken anymore and there is no need for two worlds with different physical laws.
Maybe miracles are just that, manipulation of probability instead of forces. If you could control the entropic content of physical system without touching the temperature and volume of the system, that means you could control the probabilities associated with the description of that system. We don't know how to do that of course, but maybe Jesus Christ knew.

#80 Re: Life on Mars » If life really was discovered on Mars - how would people react? » 2004-03-25 21:27:53

Is there any mention of Mars in the bible ?
I mean not just the "heavens" but Mars specifically.

#81 Re: Not So Free Chat » Zubrin to debate Hubble - with Sean OKeefe on CNN » 2004-03-23 11:23:33

It's not about Hubble but the shuttle. In
[http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/23/natio … 3SHUT.html]http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/23/natio … 3SHUT.html
New York Times, registration required (free)

they say that the shuttle had flaw in the aerobrakes and that it flew with that default, potentially fatal, for decades.
Then I though about that:
Their is probably no "perfect" aircraft ever made. I remember the F104 starfighter with a very bad record in some countries (germany or Belgium I think, where many F104 crashed).
Any aircraft has some good and bad. That's part of the design,  why now, aircraft must be suddenly perfect to fly ?

I don't say that to save the Shuttle, it's too old anyway, but it's the concept to exploit the smallest details to conclude ultimatly that the aircraft had defaults and shouldn't be used.
Is it just me or I see politic everywhere now ?

#82 Re: Not So Free Chat » Spinning the Spanish election - Another thought » 2004-03-22 09:37:12

I was right for the french elections : the moderate right party reculed, the socialists and other leftists were stable or slightly progressed and the so called far-right party, the equivalent of the american republican party (sorry but that's the truth, you don't like it, but that's the truth, the french FN is just a conservative, republican party, called far-right by leftist media) significantly improved its score.
Probably people realize that in a world ruled by extremists, you cannot afford anymore to be the nice guy, moderate and all that.

I predict that if Bush wins the elections, you gonna have a huge surge of 'republican conservative FN-like' in all europe. If Kerry wins, then the FN will stabilize and european moderates will regain their power.

#83 Re: Not So Free Chat » Spinning the Spanish election - Another thought » 2004-03-20 16:05:14

Not all Christians follow Jerry Falwell or Mel Gibson. Me, for example. smile

I am amazed to see the success of this movie.
I havn't seen it myself but I wonder, Is it real coincidence ?
Could it be that all these repeatitive endless stories about muslim suicides/Sharron retaliation/Israel extension/muslim suicide/etc could reactivate the old christian mysticism ?

Just a reaction: christians feel trapped between Islamic and Jewish ideologic integrism, so they go back to their own values to avoid to be crushed.

For the Gaza band, you don't like the idea ?

#84 Re: Not So Free Chat » Spinning the Spanish election - Another thought » 2004-03-20 15:43:13

What I say metaphorically is that, in my opinion, these guys called neo-cons, with their doctrine of preemptive war, they practice a modern esoterism.

With the help of a compass and and ruler, maybe, or with the hidden meanings found in the Kaballa, they do calculus. Like:

If we invade that country A, with a price of X thousands deads and Y billions dollars, then we might save Z lives in that country K, plus or minus squared root of X deads, we must end up to reach our goal with X-Z deads acceptable by f% of the americans and g% of muslims, this is being true for 50<Y<100 $billions.
They might think that they can rule on minds and people, trading life and money for  power. They might succeed a little bit, as the Devil oftens give you peanuts in exchange of your soul, to make you believe that you are right, that your calculus was exact. They might also end up with a completely different outcome:

They want to eradicate muslim integrism by force ?
they just create a new area of Christian Integrism and intolerance to counterbalance a stronger Muslim and Sionic Extremism.
(maybe the movie the "Passion" is just an advertissement, beware !)
Integrisms against Integrisms, only the neo-cons know where we go.

They want to resolve the middle orient problems ? fine, the new Papal Inquisition declares that since both parties cannot reach a peacefull agreement in the Gaza band, then ALL parties and all human soul MUST evacuate the GAZA band, and burn it to the root, and that the land will belong to the first root of grass, carried by the winds, wich will seed again the area.

Other ideas anybody ?

#85 Re: Not So Free Chat » Spinning the Spanish election - Another thought » 2004-03-20 14:57:56

What I said cryptically (because the eye on top of the pyramid is watching us) is that maybe, these old stories of Judeo Massonic complot, they might be true after all.

and if it is true, then maybe we should reinstall the Holly Papal Inquisition and Exorcism.

Take Richard Perle, throw him in the river with a 100 kg stone around the neck. If he had trade with the devil, he must contain some evil substance that make him lighter, and he must float, and then be purified on the stake.

We must go back to basics.

#86 Re: Not So Free Chat » Spinning the Spanish election - Another thought » 2004-03-20 14:35:44

Thanks to them, each July 14th, part of US regiments should parade on Champs Elysées as a reminding for those fallen on Normandy beaches.
That was a question to Dickbill  smile

I know I know, don't take me too seriously.
I agree with you, and I disagree with the notion of pre-emptive war. As you said, international police with UN supervision yes, pre-emptive war, no.

What I said cryptically (because the eye on top of the pyramid is watching us) is that maybe, these old stories of Judeo Massonic complot, they might be true after all.

#87 Re: Not So Free Chat » Spinning the Spanish election - Another thought » 2004-03-20 12:57:26

Dickbill, hand me a riding crop -- I'm going to flagellate a bit too!

Ahhh ! at least somebody to flagellate with me, ex-adorator of Cthulhu, but better that than nothing.

#88 Re: Not So Free Chat » Spinning the Spanish election - Another thought » 2004-03-20 10:55:07

Up to muslim eyes, Bush and Sharon can be called "hitlers", YOU ARE THE THREAT.
As long as Europe has not taken economic sanctions at Israel,
we shal be seen as ennemies of the Arabs as the Muslims.
That is our part of guilt.

Don Panic, go back and flagellate youserlf more, because the Time of Armageddon is coming.
The Eye on Top of Pyramid and the Sons of David, which rule America, has seen and hoped for that moment for a long time.
Now the Times are coming.
I gotta go to flagellate a little bit.

#89 Re: Not So Free Chat » Spinning the Spanish election - Another thought » 2004-03-20 10:41:22

Which brings us back to the Spain situation. While I have limited information on the mood of the Spanish people of late, I suspect that more was at work than a simple reaction to the terrorist attacks. However, the election results will be interpreted as terrorism working, not least of all by the terrorists themselves. And that is the uncomfortable truth we're going to have to come to grips with, terrorism does work,

That's the spin american right-wings want to put on this election.
The truth is more simple, while spain has a big 'conservative' pool, the leftist pool is just bigger. Probably young spanish people make the biggest of that leftist-centrist pool. But whatever, right wingers are never happy. They don't like socialist in spain ? what about right wingers in France ? they won't like it either I bet.
This is all going out of control, by people who think they can control the world, using war as a political lever.

I would put all the Bushies neocons in the deset for 40 days, without food. Until the Snake comes and offer them the world, the power, the glory, the security, the richness, the money, the money the money the money: the Golden Calf.

Only one man had the guts to say No to that, and he doesn't work at the White House.

#90 Re: Unmanned probes » Spirit & Opportunity*4* - continue here » 2004-03-19 13:54:13

marine pollymetallic nodules :

[http://www.mnhn.fr/mnhn/geo/Collection_ … es_eng.htm]http://www.mnhn.fr/mnhn....eng.htm


seems much less homogenous in shape than the martian nodules. Probably that the nucleation processus was completely different.

#91 Re: Not So Free Chat » Spinning the Spanish election - Another thought » 2004-03-19 12:45:53

US sales of SUVs are [http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=s … fsuvbuyers]up. Go figure that.  ???

You cannot have everything. Long term peace is based on solid fundations and healthy policy.
MAny things in american policy don't make sense but I think that people can be teach better what is the consequence of their choice. Free choice is great, but you have to have the knowledge which come with free choice.
I cannot believe that with a choice between a clean H2 or electric car that gives healthy ecology and healthy relation in the middle east, people will continue to choose the short sighted, testosterone loaded SUV cars, just because the "bachelor" has the same SUV or teenagers like it fast and shiny.

People change of mind can be easily induced. What's gonna be difficult to influence are the OIL lobbies and dependant industries. I believe clean/oil free cars could have been made a long time ago but the OIL companies do not see that favorably. Neither do the Saoudis kingdom of course. Rather, the OIL compagnies use the excuse to say "that's the consumers who don't want slow electric cars, that's not our fault". yeah sure.
I bet that if H2 or electric cars were available right now, in the present political context, people would choose massively over oil powered cars. Maybe not everybody, but a trend would be created, irreversibly.

I was in Miami last week end, I saw a Lamborghini locked in the chaotic traffic, sweating  gas fumes and oil to advance two meters, and ridiculous babes-bait cars (with no babes aboard), like in the "happy days". All that can be changed faster than you think. That's not the problem.

#92 Re: Unmanned probes » Spirit & Opportunity*4* - continue here » 2004-03-19 11:34:43

Opportunity :
[http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/ … 56M2M1.JPG]http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery....2M1.JPG

It seems there is two populations of spherules, pretty homogene in size and some doublets budding. Why such homogeneity of size ? why all intermediate size are not found ?
And why just doublet budding, if the spherules are concretions, growing around a nucleus randomly spaced, we should observe doublet triplets etc, even blobs-like aggregates of spherules.

I am puzzled. Have we ever observed such things on earth, in acidic volcanic lakes for example ?

#93 Re: Not So Free Chat » Spinning the Spanish election - Another thought » 2004-03-19 10:46:36

Taking the iraqi's oil is the ultimate mistake, in this case, the arabs understand "stealing" instead of "taking".
The US should not do that, that' the sillyest thing to do, (so they will probably do it). The european and France should not do it either and they should make repentance and moult flagellation for all the dirty bussiness they've done with Saddam. It's not because other guys, including the US, did that dirty bussiness, that they had to do it too.

The reason is that what gives so much power to the house of saoudis and other Bush's friends is OIL and our dependance of it. That money comes from the devil since it is not associated with righteous sweat and work. Without this oil, what could be these friends of Dubbya ? camels and goat farmers at best. They would have no power and no money to send to AlQuaeda.

So the US should see OIL independance as the ultimate solution, unfortunatly long term. Reconverting the all automobile park to H2 car or electric car can probably be spread over tens of years, not less. Nevertheless years after year, the oil importation would decrease, and the saoudis would start to seriously worry about their status as the source of their power slowly evaporates.

That means that US citizens must accept nuclear energy as a substitute for the oil. It can be clean and safe you know.

Dickbill the wise.

#94 Re: Unmanned probes » Spirit & Opportunity*4* - continue here » 2004-03-18 12:52:02

Mystery Spheres on Mars Finally Identified

"Hematite as a major compositional phase in the spherules supports their formation via precipitation, rather than as impact-related fallout,"
read article 
[http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/ma … 40317.html]Space.com

But if I remember well, there were two kinds of spherules, the non shiny and the shiny, with a distinct metallic reflection.
The one in "blueberry bowl" seems the non-shiny type, was it this one the hematite ?
Could the shiny type be iron sulfur/pyrite ?

Also, subsidary question. I remember vaguely how works a mosbauer spectrometer, mostly forgotten from a long time teaching, but could somebody here describe shortly what is that Mausbauer spectrometry  ? thanks

#95 Re: Not So Free Chat » Spinning the Spanish election - Another thought » 2004-03-18 10:47:22

The Husband took a stand, as men sometimes do, and said, "No."

The Wife, well, she was shocked, and realized that her position was being challenged. So, she stopped sleeping in the same bed as him. The husband just went into the bathroom with some old Esquire magazines.

that's what happen in He3 mines in the moon. Lonely gold miners...

But back to the spanish spinning. It still continues. Friedman in the New York times, said that the decision of the spanish voters was "crazy". He says exactly (copy/paste thanks NYT)
"Spain is planning to do something crazy: to try to appease radical evil by pulling Spain's troops out of Iraq — even though those troops are now supporting the first democracy-building project ever in the Arab world."

My advice to Mr Friedman : stop eating Paellas, pour the spannish wine in the street etc

#96 Re: Not So Free Chat » Appropriate Topics: On War and Politics » 2004-03-18 09:22:44

[http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=s … al_qaida_3]Spanish truce?

I've just about had enough of politics for one week, but these two headlines caught my attention.

--Cindy

That' terrible but very predictible.
Here is the result of the spinning of the spanish redraw by the right wingers: It gives too much credit to Al Quaeda.
Guys with no link to Al Quada claim responsability and congratulates the spanish government and assure them that they won't get any more bombing if they continue their anti-US stance. Right wingers have transform a terrorist attack into a political victory for AlQuaeda.

OK, back to the spanish decision :
In military terms it doesn't matter. Bush make a forcing to impose an Iraqi constitution to be able to redraw tens of thousands of troops by the end of this year (and having a chance to win the election), so the spanish redrawing 1300 soldiers 3 months  (scheduled in July) before the US redraw 10 times more ? 

In political terms, that's the big deal for Bush because it is a strong desaproval of his policy and it could have a domino effect.
But if Aznar had been reelected and had he decided to redraw his troops for any reason in July, while continuing to support the US politically, no spinning would have happened.

All Bush wants finally, is moral and political support, I don't think he cares much about troops at this point.

#97 Re: Not So Free Chat » Spinning the Spanish election - Another thought » 2004-03-17 12:39:54

The dispute is about weither or not spanish people'votes have been directed by the terrorists. I think the issue was settled before because, yes, a majority in spain opposed its own government policy. The attentat influenced, especially because supposedly the government tried to blame ETA instaed of the islamist, but I don't think that it was that that decided the voters.
It's not nice to say "spanish are like french wee-wee who turn their back in front of the danger" after all the benedictum and sanctitum urbi and orbi that Dubya gave them.
The spanish vote was predictible, with or without the attentat.

In France there are elections soon, But I doubt that France will vote leftist. French realize that they don't have anymore to be ashmed and culpabilized by the leftist for being patriotic and conservator since guys like Le Pen are moderate democrate leftists compared to guys like Dick Cheney. Why french should be ashmed to vote for moderate like Le Pen when a majority of US citizen support ultraconservators at the white house ? It's difficult to stay moderate in a world of extremists.

#98 Re: Not So Free Chat » Appropriate Topics: On War and Politics » 2004-03-16 19:42:11

But UN need somebody more punchy than Annan. Hans Blix maybe ? or an old USSR official : Gorbatchov. I would think also about Jimmy Carter.

Bill Clinton? The Europeans love him.

yes, he would certainly have the quality and experiences. But maybe he is too young and J. Carter got a Noble price.
But yes, I think Clinton would be better than Annan.

#99 Re: Meta New Mars » Finding active discussions » 2004-03-16 15:47:58

If there is a particular issue you wish to address, just start a topic.

welcome to the forum.

Before you start a new topic, you can also browse a little bit in the pages of threads. Only the first page is displayed. For example, I have opened 2 or 3 topics in the MArs forum, they usually get buried after a while, but I know there are there. When I want to talk about it again (like the anthropic principle) I don't open a new identical topic, I just retrieve the old one, usually in pages 3 or 4. Have fun.

#100 Re: Not So Free Chat » Appropriate Topics: On War and Politics » 2004-03-16 13:24:32

Wesley Clark advocated a transfer of supreme command in Iraq to NATO,

Why not UN ? it's a UN job no ?
The UN prestige is reinforced after the Iraq war. UN have a momentum, they could use it. But UN need somebody more punchy than Annan. Hans Blix maybe ? or an old USSR official : Gorbatchov. I would think also about Jimmy Carter.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB