New Mars Forums

Official discussion forum of The Mars Society and MarsNews.com

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Announcement: This forum is accepting new registrations via email. Please see Recruiting Topic for additional information. Write newmarsmember[at_symbol]gmail.com.

#8901 Re: Exploration to Settlement Creation » First settlements » 2012-04-17 20:11:11

Thank you Louis, I enjoyed the provisions on glass.  Perhaps when I retire I will take a greater interest in glass as a hobby.

Void wrote:
So if that machine found a collection of attributes reasonably near a favored location and that prompted the first settlement to be established there what would that collection be?

I have this list of probable materials in Hellas.
-Magnetic Meteor Iron.
-Glaciers, and probabbly other ice under the soil in places.
-Thicker atmosphere.
-Not a true polar location (Not as harsh as the poles).
One other thing I think is possible is Copper Sulphate?
http://spacefellowship.com/news/art2077 … lakes.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copper(II)_sulfate
I am presuming that if the last part of the wet period of Mars was acid as is said, copper in the soil and rocks would have been leached out, and would end up as disolved materials in lakes in Hellas, and that when those lakes dried up, there would have been salt pans.  I don't know how to get copper out of copper sulphate, but I would imagine it can be done somehow.

I might also what to find salt domes and perhaps even petroleum in association with those.  But, I am not thinking that such a convenience is likely to be near the site which would be selected, but maybe.

I guess a really big need would be the resources to make good glass with, but I don't know what that is yet.

Lewis wrote:

Copper I have always understood to be pretty rare.

Here is a guide to glass constituents.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glass#Glass_ingredients

The quartz sands/silica should not be a problem but we may struggle to fund calcium carbonate. In fact as the latter is useful/essential in steel production, we might have to think in terms of taking quite a lot of that material with us to begin with.

I can't really see why the denser atmosphere is an advantage. Some minimal protection against radiation?   I don't think we should worry about atmopsheric pressure too much.

Petroleum seems pretty unlikely. We can make our own though, if you think it's important!

Iron ore should be pretty ubiquitous. Why is magnetic meteor iron required?

Copper may be rare, but with an acid rain or acid snow melt for tens or thousands or even hundreds of thousands of years, I would expect that little bits of native copper and other copper would have disolved into sulphides, and washed into the salt seas and lakes.  I would expect to find the remnants of those in Hellas, perhaps under some significant amount of air borne sediments.

However salt domes are fluid, and will erupt to the surface, and carry copper sulphide and perhaps calcium salts with it.

Here are some links to sudy, and then I will continue my reply:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calcium

http://www.jmcgowan.com/mars_reprint.PDF


I certainly hope this is not hoaxed: (Notice the petroleum seep, and remember that there are places on Mars where Methane replenishes into the atmosphere).
http://www.martinhovland.com/Mars%20and … 20Salt.htm

http://earth-pages.co.uk/2009/09/01/and … s-on-mars/

And here is my badge of shame:
http://outerspaceplace.blogspot.com/201 … -mars.html

As for Calcium Carbide, I reccomend a study of Methane seeps in the ocean and the creatures that inhabit them.  Clams?  Make methane, feed the clams, and I guess food and shells.  If you could get the salts from a salt dome or salt pan, then calcium salts that could be added to the tank.  No lights needed, and temperatures do not have to be that high.  Just Oxygen, Methane and salt water I presume.

A thick atmosphere offers a better chance to get the starter materials from Earth down safely I would think.  More time to get the parachutes to do their job.

The bottom of Hellas actually will allow temporary drops of water in the soil, provided the water were there, and also provided that it was heated.  However it is arid, and evaporation would quickly take water on the surface away.  However, a bag of icewater would do quite nicely.  Just put it in a hole, put an A-Frame glass greenhouse over it to protect it from U.V. and to hold some heat in.  At night it would develop ice, but during the day this would keep it from going above the tripple point.  Just make sealed bags with water and nutrients.  Put plants in them, and put them in the greenhouse.  The bags could actually hold a bit more pressure, but why make things harder.  Let plants grow, and then take the bags into your shelter and open them.  I know that there are not a huge number of plants other than Algae which would love this, but I bet if the tundra were searched you might find some advanced plants that might deal with this.  They might have food value or be altered to have food value.  If greenhouse gasses were used to evaporate the CO2 on Mars, then the pressure at the bottom of Hellas could rise to at least 20 Millibars.  This implies that the process I just described could become even more feasable.  And of course their is the dream of having an Ozone layer.  If you had 20 Millibars in the bottom of Hellas and an Ozone layer, then there is really a chance that some very tough crops could be gown out of doors with irrigation.  That would have to be a plus.  Putting the first settlement near this location might make some sense for such a reason as well.  And yes there is a slight radiation improvement I presume.

Finally, if a glacier 1/2 mile thick max, and the size of Los Angeles were melted, then a dry valley lake could be created and sustained.  The ice in this location would be more stable and would require less effort to protect it.  I see this dry valley lake as having enormous significance for the generation of electric power.

Petrolium is commonly found in salt domes.  We are continuously fed stories about how petroleum is only created from fossil life, but while that could be true also, consider what happens if a plate subducts deep into the Earth, drawing with it water.  If it encounters non-oxidized rocks and metals at high heat, the oxygen is plucked off the water.  Leaving Hydrogen, which is about as small as a molecule gets.  This hydrogen has the best chances of working it's way up through the Mantle and crust and during such a passage can pick up carbon and become Methane.  This alternate theory believes that actually Oil and Coal are mostly created by the contiunuation of that process where eventually the Methane gets trapped in a dome structure, and the Hydrogen eventually breaks free and leave behind a concentrate of Carbon/Oil/Coal.  In that theory, fossils in coal are actually just indeed plant matter burried which created an ideal place for leaking oil/Methane to collect.  Consider the Tar Sands in Canada. 

And there is also very likely the notion that Hydrated materials would have been burried inside the planets even during their formation.  Perhaps not water, but indeed this is even a possibility.  In such a case as that Hydrogen, Methane, Carbon Monoxide, Carbon Dioxide are constantly working their way up from the core, both on Earth an Mars.

A book to consider is "The Deep Hot Biophere" by Thomas Gold.  So then if true for Earth then very likely for Mars as well, but perhaps a bit different in nature.

Why Meteoric Iron?  Because as someone on this site said, a robot cart with magnets could collect it for you while you were working on other problems like making glass.  Eventualy regular iron mining, but why not take the easy stuff first.  It is going to be hard enough getting humans established without taking advantage of an easy prise.

In fact every thing we do to survive depends upon things that Nature gives to us easily.  The first settlement will be very weak, and will need all the advantages it can get.

As you might have guessed, I am not that proficient in language skills.  Space Relations, Science, maybe some Math.  Even so, I suggest that the word "Colony" be phased out.  It suggests exploitation, and?carries much other unsuitable bagage, which are linked to social demands which have to do with a past on Earth, and places a confused burden on our dreams for the future of Mars.  We don't need to set this "Child" up with a "Disinheritance" which "Social Engineers" might hope to tap for power and from their own narrow and misguided perceptions of realities which hides their selfishness even from themselves, where they become compelled to try to inhibit progress.  I suggest other words such as "Settlement".

#8902 Re: Exploration to Settlement Creation » First settlements » 2012-04-17 14:59:33

So if that machine found a collection of attributes reasonably near a favored location and that prompted the first settlement to be established there what would that collection be?

I have this list of probable materials in Hellas.
-Magnetic Meteor Iron.
-Glaciers, and probabbly other ice under the soil in places.
-Thicker atmosphere.
-Not a true polar location (Not as harsh as the poles).
One other thing I think is possible is Copper Sulphate?
http://spacefellowship.com/news/art2077 … lakes.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copper(II)_sulfate
I am presuming that if the last part of the wet period of Mars was acid as is said, copper in the soil and rocks would have been leached out, and would end up as disolved materials in lakes in Hellas, and that when those lakes dried up, there would have been salt pans.  I don't know how to get copper out of copper sulphate, but I would imagine it can be done somehow.

I might also what to find salt domes and perhaps even petroleum in association with those.  But, I am not thinking that such a convenience is likely to be near the site which would be selected, but maybe.

I guess a really big need would be the resources to make good glass with, but I don't know what that is yet.

#8903 Re: Life support systems » Mars Colony "Vacuum welding, Sintering". » 2012-04-17 14:51:00

That was very generous and useful SpaceNut.

I have gone through a fair part of it and plan to look it all over.

I see that basalt sinter by itself has limited strength, so that is a bit dissapointing, but perhaps something will eventually be figured out to upgrade the product.

I am still curious about sintering magnetic Meteor Iron, and am wondering if putting a wire mesh into the formed item would help it have useful strength.

I am curious about the printing of metal powder, and wonder if that could be done like a microscopic steel making process, for instance adding carbon as was suggested in one of the other threads.  Not sure about excluding enough slag though, I wonder how much silica a Nickle/Iron meteor has in it?  I would think that a sinter of that material should at least be suitable to be a Permenant Magnet, or the core of a Solenoid, or perhaps bearing housings.

Thanks again.

#8904 Re: Exploration to Settlement Creation » First settlements » 2012-04-16 16:53:54

Good locations for early settlements...does anyone want to give some suggestions?

(There was this list at the old Red Colony site -  http://www.redcolony.com/art.php?id=0008150  )

I think the prerequisites will be safe landing sites,  access to water and iron ore and interesting objects of research.

Somewhere near the Valles Marineris has got to be a prime candidate in terms of object of research, but I am not sure how far it meets other criteria.

http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/martia … 70820.html

Does anyone know the location of equatorial glaciers on Mars?

I choose Hellas.

Glaciers 1/2 mile thick?
Pressure maximum 1.89 * Mean
Not too far south.

http://www.space.com/11456-mars-dry-ice … water.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/scie … -Mars.html
http://geology.com/research/glaciers-on-mars.shtml
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hellas_Planetia

So, that means that if the dry ice that is known of can be evaporated, I supposed by greenhouse gasses, then the best pressure at the bottom of Hellas could be 20-21 Millibars.

Even now it is somewhat favorable to the existence of temporary liquid water.

The glaciers of course as a source of water, uphill, so that a gravity feed of melted water is possible.  (In a covered canal or pipeline).

I have very great reservations about notions of greenhouses I see portraid on this web site or others.

It is my opinion that Glass would be best used in a unpressurzed "A-Frame" where the Panes could be changeable with metal fittings, and no siginificant pressurization would be employed.  The A-Frame with glass would be to filter out U.V. and to hold heat in, and to keep some dust out.

I would say that I think that in that structure could be bags of water, where the bags could hold a reasonable pressure, and would support aquatic plant life.
In adition, bags re-enforced with "Hose" like counter pressure suits.  Where the joins would occur between "Sausage Links", a metal frame which the "Hose/Net" would be anchored with lashings.  Inside this perhaps a soil of styrafoam which your bamboo could grow, and upon which humans could walk.  The styraform peices allowing digging to access leaks.  Hydrophonic fluid to feed the bamboo or other crops.

I really like to imagine an "A-Frame" where also inside of it is an unpressurized vapor-barrier tent inside of that a capacitive device which has a wick attached to it.

I have seen chart recorders where a paper sheet could be held to it by electostatic force.  It was rather strong.  "Hewlett Packerd" made them I belive.  Havn't seen them around lately.  The same method could pressurize a root system for the plants where the wick could be wetted.  The point being that at the low elevations of Hellas, this method might support a specially engineered crop where no strong effort is needed to make allow the plant to grow.  Just a glass A-Frame, a vapor barrier tent, and a root system facitated by electostatic force.

If this works, then you have a hope of machines serving the needs of people, rather than people making unreasonable efforts to make anything grow.

A profit is a must.

smile

Oh, and I didn't even mention how you could easily tunnel into the glacier to provide space for industrial activities, and natural "Freezers" for food.

Neither did I mention Antarctic Dry Valley Lakes.  Or did I?

smile

And then the extra layer of atmosphere, to assist parachutes for landing?
smile smile smile

I see it as win, win, win.

#8905 Re: Life support systems » Mars Colony "Vacuum welding, Sintering". » 2012-04-16 15:46:23

In this case we are not talking about payload but a process, and a set of processes.  Granted, fairly heavy machinery is required, but you have prompted me to think about it some more.

If you have to have an air lock which cycles between Martian ambient, and the habitation values, then that airlock can double as an vacuum chamber for processes that are favored by vacuum.  At least until a dedicated chamber can be built out of local materials.

As for a heat source, if that is a show stopper, then there is no point of going to Mars with the intention of doing industrial activities.

Because of your post, I was very concerned that I was being needlessly redundant.  However, I searched for "Vacuum", "Welding", "Sintering", and "Basalt".

Vacuum; Many hits naturally in a site dedicated to space.
But in particular;
"Iron and Steel on Mars" (GWJohnson, dealing with molten steel I think).
"This thread"

Welding; Four hits, only two for this section "Life support systems".
"Iron and Steel on Mars".  (I havn't found the reference yet)
"This thread"
(This seems to indicate that the people here don't have much to do with industrial or construction activities).

Sintering; Two refereces.
"3D Printers"
"This Thread"

Basalt; Many references.
-"Iron and Steel on Mars" (I believe this refers to iron in basalt)
-"This thread".

Anyway my intentions are to learn and also to add if I can.  I am quite interested in solar sinter of basalt.  I am guessing you would want an Anealing oven to put the product into.


I beleive I saw it on TV once a long time ago were it was a demonstration of making a brick from simulated lunar materials.  The brick did not look like much, but it was an accomplishment anyway.

I suppose a direct solar process could be resorted to at first, but as I said a air lock could also be a vacuum chamber. 

I am also interested in how mineral wool and tar could be used to join such tiles/bricks together into larger blocks.  These might also be used for foundations in place of cement.  This is related to another thread about concrete, Cement, and Icecrete.

I am also interested if fibers of some kind could be embeded in a sinter.  For instance could you plate a layer of metal over a mineral wool fiber, and then put those fibers into the basalt sinter, and so strengthen it?

And yes I have borrowed good ideas from other people such as the 3D printers.  I am genuinely interested to know if Meteroite metal could be ground to a fine powder and that printed to make structural members, and tools.  I can see where by alternating types of metals and alloys, unusual properties could be arrived at.

Really no disrespect intended, but I am interested in these conversations and the parallel conversations for Iron and Concrete.  I want to contribute not compete.

I actually worked in a Hemitite processing facility, I worked in the pilot facility where Taconite tachonology was pioneered (Don't get me wrong, I was a Labor/Operator then, but I saw the equipment and operated it.  The Crusher for instance.  The Magnetic separation.  The Agglomeration and so on.  I am not much on the actual furnaces, we only made ceramic pellets.  However that Hemitite plant did have a sinter experiment.  I missed it, but I did have conversation about it.

Finally I worked at a Taconite Facility where I was involved with shoveling dirt, hosing dirt down drains, working in a electic motor shop and also was trained as an electrician, became an electronic repairman, and also was involved in process control, and worked on blue prints.  Since then I have acquired many other skills at my new job. 

I am just saying I am not eager to be dismissed lightly in these matters.  I have actually been there.

Now as far as sintering Meteor particles which are largely metalic, I wonder if between bouts of vacuum, Hydrogen gas could be injected to be a getter for Oxygen clinging to the surface, and also to reduce Iron Oxde.

I also wonder if mineral wool fibers first coated with a layer of metal could be included to add some strength, similar to fiberglass.  I guess it would be no good if the mineral wool melted, but perhaps the Vacuum Weld/Sinter temperatures could be lower than that.

Baring that then wires of some strong metal instead of the mineral wool.

#8906 Life support systems » Mars Colony "Vacuum welding, Sintering". » 2012-04-15 10:05:16

Void
Replies: 8

I made the subject name start similar to "Mars Colony Cement and Concrete".  In fact I was considering putting this there and you can certainly move it if you want.

In this case I am hoping that forms would allow natural materials such as dune material to be "Vacuum welded/Sintered" into blocks by the material being exposed to a higher vacuum than is natural on the surface of Mars, and also with the application of heat.

Here are some links for reference:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_cementing
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sintering

This would involve molds, a vacuum, and a heat source, and perhaps a Hydrolic Ram.

The mold itself could be evacuated, or I think more probabbly a building would be constructed where the pressure is evacuated, a large vacuum bell.  This should be more practicle to do on Mars as it is now, than it is to do on the Earth (~6MB vs ~1000MB+).

I presume that people in counterpressure suits could work inside of that chamber, as easily as out on the surface of Mars.

Obviously I am attracted to the dunes because there may be a general similarity of the particles in a dune, and these might be cemented with ice, but otherwise it should be possible to shovel the stuff up.

This then would be a "Ceramic" material.

However, there has been a discussion of collecting magnetic iron from the surface of Mars.  I wonder if that could be cleaned could it also be sintered?  Not likely to be a high grade metal material, but maybe as good as Cast Iron?  In such a sintering process, could fibers of a material with a equal or higher melt point be imbedded, to provide greater strength?  Sintering occurs at a temperature below the melting point of the materials.

Another thought is could the magnetic iron collected be ground down in a "Balling Drum" to a powder, and that poweder also be used to print 3D objects inside of the vacuum bell, using Vacuum Welding/Sintering?  If structured and with fiber additives, perhaps something quite strong could result, without the standard steel making process.  I used to work in a place with "Balling Drums"  used to grind Taconite Ore. It was a wet process.

#8907 Re: Terraformation » Impact Ejecta » 2012-04-15 09:15:58

Clark, I thank you for your guidance.   I see that you have been here a long time, and I would never want to mess up what others have made.

However, Karov and Terraformer say a lot of interesting things, some times seeming very far out, and sometimes even impracticle, but that is only our preception.  A new thing is usually poorly crafted at first.  Hard work makes it into something that people take for granted.

I was attempting to establish a scaffold for connetion to Karovs thinking, which I have a hard time understanding sometimes.  I did throw a bunch of leads out there.  I wanted to see of Karov would reject them or not, that would help me understand what he is driving towards.

You are correct, this material is hard to place for a location here.  I guess if you guys wanted to you could say that things must be only about Mars, but I will respectfully and weakly suggest that:
1) If pan spermia is in fact a natural process, then Mars likely was involved with it, and had life or has life, related to that of Earth and other places.
2) By contemplating expansion of humans to Mars, we are apparently taking the first baby steps towards a possible future which would involve interstellar civilization, and by speculating on what existing alien civilizations may have done, we can speculate better on the future of our "Kind?" and I guess how Mars might best fit into that progression.

In spite of my arguments, however, I respect your concerns and complaints.

#8908 Re: Terraformation » Impact Ejecta » 2012-04-14 09:12:38

What are E.T.'s motivations?

Let me know if I deviate too far from your notion of what this thread is about.

I really have a problem with the notion that robots would replace humans.  I would be more inclined to think that a robot would want to aquire human properties, and a human aquire robot properties.

Some believe that electronics could evenutally emulate a brain exactly.  I am not so sure. The substances must have different inherant properties.  Especially if quantum effects are a part of the human mind.  However I could certaily be shown wrong on that.

My next move into advanced alienhood, would be to have my skull bone replaced with a computer, or a computer cap you could put over your existing head.  I am presuming that this would involve a computer with atomic level switches.  This would be integrated into the brain, as the next layer. 

So, as far as robots being more intellegent than humans, the big question is just how intellegent do you want a "Person" to be?

Compactness?  I just read an article which suggested that the ability to 3D print physical objects is going to change the notions of business, and industry around the planet.  These are the objects to be printed from plastics and metal powders.

For North America it is suggested that much less would be brought in from China, and that much would be produced locally, very locally.

You suggested that E.T. may not be all that interested in conquering endless expanses of space.

I think that whatever humans may turn into, E.T. could also turn into, so in the end the civilzations would produce similar beings.

I think that the polyneasian model is the one E.T. might choose.  Settle a certain number of star systems, so that when one dies, another is in the process of a revival.  This then gaurantees a continuing heritage.

But since there would be no boundries, until a rival E.T. group would be encountered, then there would be a certain amount of leakage where misfits and malcontents would go to the edges and move to unoccupied terratory.

As for compactification, I get the notion of large bee's nests?  Full of E.T.'s?

For efficiency, humans could modify their human forms to be the size of hobits or smaller for efficiency, and yet be intellegent due to a skull cap computer agumentation?

The questions are; How many Cyborgs(Humans) are enough?  How intellegent is intellegent enough?  Won't they get bored if they have mental capacities which far exceed their challenge?  Who is going to play on the playground?

In the end arn't we all just looking for a good time?  By my judgement no sane being should say "I want to suffer in hell forever".  No they usually want to go to heaven and be happy.

So isn't happiness what we want and also E.T.?

And to the original subject, common microbes, and perhaps in some cases parallel conditions, and so parallel evolution. 

To far from us to mate with directly, but if each creature has RNA/DNA and two civilizations met, might they just decide to artificially build "Children" creatures, and populate some star systems with them, by grafting capabilities from both races into the "Children".

I don't see that it is necessary to have alien E.T.'s seeking the elimimination of those who do not resemble them.

Machines only?  Why?  If a machine species, then most likely it would seek to add cellular machinery to it's "Children".

I hope I did not get too far off track.

#8909 Re: Terraformation » Impact Ejecta » 2012-04-13 23:57:41

So then Ancient E.T. might choose to leave a legacy by messing with and inventing transmissable organisms?

Should Seti be looking for messages in the DNA of primitive organisms that don't evolve very fast? smile smile smile

Very Funny Ancient E.T.! smile

#8910 Re: Planetary transportation » Air breathing engines on Mars » 2012-04-13 23:50:12

I have more imagination than skill in these matters, but so far I have been stimulated to visualize:
1) A rocket with a propeller at the top, which has airplane wings for blades, and that that propeller would have intake holes where the pressure were the highest.
The propeller would be rotated with rotons. smile I'm sorry, I am stuck on rotons.  The "Propeller" would be an "Air" compresser, and that compresser would feed the rotons, and also the main rocket stack with compressed Martian gas.  The "Propeller" might give some lift, but actually it is to be an "Air" compressor primarily.
I was thinking solid rocket fuel, both for the rotons and the main stack.  Although the fuel may not have any Oxydizer, it is not a law that it would not.  So the Oxydation part could be partially Martian air and partially solid fuel.  I was thinking also that Aluminum powder could be included.

I was thinking that the solid "Jet?" boosters could be "Printed" with metal powders.

So actually I have no notion of a useful device in this case, just maybe something that could go up, and if it had on board oxydizer for when the atmosphere runs out, maybe even to orbit.

2) Replace the propeller with a cage fan, a rotating nose cone, again propelled by rotons, and that having a greater circumference than the rocket body, so that the cage fan would feed both the rotons and the main engine.  The rocket itself would operate in a greater vacuum, because it would travel through the vacuum bubble left by the rotating cage fan, so you could drop the atmospheric drag load.  Maybe this would be a good one for Earth?  I am more leaning towards solid fuels, Magnesium and Aluminum also.  To do useful work these would be strapped on to a load, and there would be at least two of them.

If this is a polution, I appologize in advance for the intrusion.

#8911 Re: Terraformation » Vesta, modest ambitions. » 2012-04-10 15:19:17

Terraformer said:
"You couldn't tether an O'Neill colony - it *is* a planet after all - but having it in orbit isn't such a big deal, especially if you're using it as a space elevator counterweight. Ceres synchronous orbit is approx. 750km altitude; I suspect Vesta's will be much lower. Enough that working during the weeks and recuperating in orbit will be quite practical".

Actually, I would house spinning worlds inside of non spinning worlds.

Supposing that I had the credentials, the authority, and the resources to make a Dwarf/SubDwarf Planet (I coined a phrase "SubDwaf"!), into a place for a human civilization, I would rather than a space elivator, go for hollow cylinders with many floors, planted on Vesta's surface and going up to geosynch.  If this is actually asking too much from the metals we have then I suppose space elivator.

Anyway, at geosynch, a stationary shell pressurized to < 10 mTorr.  Inside of that another stationary shell pressurized to 250 Torr?  The two shells interlocked with struts, the outershell strenth butressing that of the inner shell.

Inside of the dual stationary shell, Vacuum bells, large enough for a spinning world.  At the axis of the spinning worlds, air locks, largely air tight seals, they doi't have to be perfect.  A person leaving a 1 gee spinning world could pass into a tube at zero gee, and go to a different spinning world, perhaps one with .38 gee.  A whole tree of these worlds.  The interior of the tree having Earth normal pressure nominal.  The spinning worlds would not have large scale agriculture, but instead, quarters, and small decorative parks, with artificial lighting.  No windows.

The reason such a spinning world were to be in a vacuum bell, is to keep them under continuing pressure testing, and also to reduce air friction energy losses to a minimum.

Returning to the double shell which is like a body cavity to contain the tree of spinning worlds like intestines in the belly, windows might be an option, and zero gee agriculture, but I am even inclined to exclude them from this.

Air leaking from the inner shell into the gap between the two shells, would be pumped back into the inner shell.

As for agriculture, why not have attachments to the double shell, with transparancies.  Perhaps s double or tripple shell arrangement.  Then zero gee agriculture.

I suggest that rooted plants could be planted into pads, and those pads be wetted with hydrophonic liquids.

The farmer would need a device to fly her around, perhaps a fan with some power source and of course a protective gaurd.

A person with a house in one of the spinning worlds might work there, or might as you have suggested travel down through a pressurized tube to the surface, and then become involved with mining or solar power.

I don't know what the probability of drilling to the core would be, but I do know that in an underground Iron mine near where I was born, the iron content was so greate that it was said that you could weld to it.

If the core were like that using pure Oxygen to burn tunnels would be an option.  I imagine a labrynth of chambers and tunnels.  And of course the metal ores.  Where would they go, those other than Iron and Nickle?  Where would then settle out to  during the formation of this world?

#8912 Re: Human missions » Bamboo shoots up the chart » 2012-04-07 11:11:21

OK, now I get to become public enemy #1.

Bamboo OK, fine, the pressurized gardens would be satisfying.  The wood good.  A sponge on a stick, ICK!

Have you considered Alergies?  Runny noses. Well what if?  What if a disease developes or is imported.  And for clean up, paper products are valuable.  And paper itself is not indespensible.  Our paperless office where I write software for, is hardly so.  I guess if you had to.  But why limit yourselves.

I propose paper from Algae.  Algae has no reason to manufacture cellulose, but could a type be created that would do so?

Pick one that is happy on cold brine like arctic sea water, one that likes about the solar flux that would exist in a greenhouse on Mars.

Make a nominally unpressurized greenhouse with a pool of cold brine in it.  Maybe -2 degrees C or colder, up to the coldest temperature where that algae could be productive to it's maximum.

The point would be to generate Oxygen to be collected from the Greenhouse and Cellulose.  From that paper, and fake wood as well.  And the dried product could also be a fuel in a pinch, perhaps easily stored outside with minimal protection.  Not a prefered fuel, just an option.

I know how responses occur here,  bamboo is fine, but if this other thing could occur why not that as well.

#8913 Re: Terraformation » Vesta, modest ambitions. » 2012-04-07 10:55:23

Well what a surprise.  I am not very wild about a space elivator myself, and would certainly hesitatate to try it on Earth or Mars until experimented with on a small scale.

Therfore Vesta or an alternate equivalant.  If it turns out to be as messed up as it seems to me it might be, better to fail on Vesta than Earth or Mars.  Or if it just pays off on Vesta then moving to Mars and Earth would not be contemplated.

Perhaps it should never be more than a thought experiment.  But I am not the master of what others try to do.

But if it does not cause annoyance, I will not withdraw the suggestion that Vesta can be tought about.  If it does cause discontent, and disharmony, then this thread can go dead, or even be removed if the higher powers would prefer.

#8914 Re: Terraformation » Vesta, modest ambitions. » 2012-04-06 12:46:52

Exactly!

I have been very careful not to place this type of post anywhere else, because I do not want to interfere with what they are trying to accomplish in those threads.

Any type of terraforming almost has to look pretty far into the future for a payoff though, so as you say.  "This is where this belongs".

And after having other people talk about space elivators on Earth and Mars, and after all the book "The high Frontier", way long ago when I was a puppy, I think I havn't gotten that far out there. smile

Terraformer also has a notion, I leave room for that.

So, I will go further out. 

A habitat assembled at a rocky asteroid and then moved to a wet one like Ceres to take up volitles, and then moved slowly to Jupiter or further out, that might be a way.

And as for small objects.  What if Alpha Centauri has no major planets, just small dry ones and comets.  Given that eventually humans might live to be thousands of year old before they die, and might cross to such a place at rather low speed over a number of centuries, maybe a little rehearsal in the mind of such a case is OK.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpha_Cent … of_planets

How about an amusement park?

If you are going to offer me a web site where I can be insulted and have free pokes in the eye, I might prefer one with a little fun.

#8915 Re: Terraformation » Planemo Hypervelocity Impactors » 2012-04-06 07:30:03

My objectives would be more consirvative.

Warm up an icy planet with an impactor prior to habitation.

A strange thing I encountered is this:
1) I can read all kinds of speculation on propelling a star ship across light years with lasers.

2) When I proposed deflecting potential impactors to an orbit which would cause a useful impact, I was told a laser would spread too much, there was no way it could work.

3) When I proposed using a laser to ping a distant object to gain information about it I was also told that a laser would spread too much.

So what is needed is focusing optics for the laser to work for case 1, and then presumable for case 2 and 3?

Although Ice is volitile, I might wonder if it could be turned into very large and precise and repairable lenses for such a purpose.

#8916 Re: Human missions » Bamboo shoots up the chart » 2012-04-06 07:12:39

http://www.lewisbamboo.com/cold-hardy-bamboo.html

http://www.bamboogrove.com/bamboo-paper.html

http://www.google.com/search?q=paper+fr … d=0CHAQsAQ

It would be nice if it was even more cold tollerant, but I am sure a greenhouse which limits it's coldest climate to that of an Iowa winter is possible on Mars.

I have always wondered how people would be able to maintain hygene on Mars without sanitary paper, such as kleenex, paper towel, and so on. And I don't think people who fly space ships would want to be doing the right hand left hand thing.

Paper from bamboo.

I also mention bamboo or other plants as evaporators.  Water with grey or even worse water, and then let them eveporate more or less clean vapors into the greenhouse air, and then condense reasonably clean water using the Martian cold nights.

Obviously this is a case where Mars is way ahead of the Moon as a place to do it.  So, less reason to divert to the Moon.

#8917 Re: Human missions » Landing on Mars » 2012-04-05 22:52:01

I think I am seeing your particular drift.  I would really like to see your plan when it emerges because I will bet it will be practicle or almost there.  And no it would not require rotons unless they are truely worth including.

#8918 Re: Terraformation » Vesta, modest ambitions. » 2012-04-05 22:45:57

Well, I am not with the dream police, so I will not take you in for further questioning. big_smile

I am wondering why I can't speculate on dwarf and almost dwarf planets?  Rotating pressurized habitats in geo synch orbit?  Am I an apostate?  Space elivators on the smallest mock up of Earth or Mars to test the concepts, is this wrong?  It's not like I am spending any ones money thinking about it.

If you wanted, I could tell you how to have artificial gravitation inside of  a location on or inside of that little world.  However, I just wanted to keep things simple and return to the basics, and see where the thought process ended up.  I confess, that this particular thread does stretch the concept of terraforming a large amount, but of course I finally added the bit about hollow spaces inside the little world.  All the way down and hollow planet?  Well, yeah, that's way beyond my original conception, but maybe finding out specifically why it is not a prefered plan is as good information as finding out what is a good plan.

I've been around a while, and spinning habitats in the asteroid belt, and indeed hollow asteroids are not new and rejectable ideas.  Given a choice, if I thought I could help to establish a population on Mars and that they would not die out like Greenland, that would be where my efforts would stay.  However, we are not in that pinch at this time. 

I think that there are plenty of wild ideas in this section "Terraforming", and that actually other than the drill to the core part, my asperations are rather modest and fairly practicle compaired to the average.

But I can take it.  And to keep the piece, I can also behave.

#8919 Re: Terraformation » Vesta, modest ambitions. » 2012-04-05 19:01:27

Well, mining is OK, but there are other places.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4_Vesta

With a rotation of 5+ hours and such a low gravitation, I am thinking easy space elivator.  Learn how to do it at Vesta, then see if you can do it at Mars.

I am also thinking hollow spinning habitats in orbit for 1/6, 1/3, 1/2, 1 gee as may work.

I am thinking further experiments with various things.

An outpost as I said for perhaps 5000 people.  Research in methods.

In fact there may not be enough water.  Importing may or may not be worthwhile.

Perpaps from such an asteroids spinning habitats could be built, and then they could move over to Ceres to pick up Water and other things such as Ammonia (Nitrogen), then load up with people, then out to the Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, Pluto and so on.

I am just investigating the potential value or lack of value to the idea.  I havn't come to a conclusion.

I guess value would be relative.

Another use of course would be mining where perhaps Mars would want to import materials.  Although it has Phobos and Demos, a person cannot be sure of what their orbital ambitions for construction might be.

Anyway, I am also willing to forget the idea, but not until examined.

It might be possible that the center could be hollowed out some day and made into a habitat with artificial gravitation machines inside of it (Spinning habitats).  But that's way out there.

Other locations;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2_Pallas
may prove more useful, but for now, we have some significant data on the nature of Vesta, so I will think about what could be done with it.

Maybe some star systems only have little worlds like Vesta, and some comets.  Very long term being able to habitate such a star system might be useful to humans.

#8920 Re: Human missions » Landing on Mars » 2012-04-05 18:44:17

Well, I have been given information both to the negative of what I suggested, and also concepts also suggested.

Might I suggest, that instead of an inverted cone, a net shaped like a badmitton "Birdie".  I guess without a roton, you could try to make it rigid, but that makes me wonder how it is stowed and deployed.

With a roton, it could drag behind in the shadow, but be spun to expand outside of the shadow.

To avoid burning up, then not deployed until, speeds are less than 1/2 mile per second?  I don't know how bad the heating is then.  I am also decending into archaic units from your point of view, but it is comfort from mine.

Anyway with a roton, this could be controllable. (Maybe)  You could spin it into the air flow to the degree that you dared, and let it be swept back into the air stream shadow, to make sure the descilleration rate is comfortable, and the heating is not excessive.

A spinning net should be deployable, and also yield more drag for the amount of device mass than a continuous cone of material.  It may shed heat better also, provided it is not pushed into the air stream too harsly.  When you get rid of it I don't know.  Maybe when it is possible to depoy a parachute.  I am inclined to wonder if retaining the roton engines would make sense however all the way down, since they could assist on the landing, and they are already paid for.  However, then the parachute and net would have to ride in a compartment mounted on the rear of the roton.  How much love a parachute would have for a spining roton, I don't know not much I am guessing.  Maybe the roton could run with the net.  The roton would shut off, and the net being ejected would pull the parachute out.  When the parachute was ejected the roton could start up again for the final landing.


Again I know you guys are levels more practiced and I will not continue beyond the point where I can reasonably speculate on these things.

#8921 Re: Human missions » Landing on Mars » 2012-04-04 18:53:15

Well, I guess I will take the bait and risk a beating.

I suggest the use of a carbon nano-tube ribbon, in conjunction with a roton on the nose of the entry vehicle.  If carbon-nanotubes are so strong, then how about a strong Ribbon/Flag (But a long one)

I know that rotons have outlived their welcome, but in this case, I am not so much suggesting helicoptering down to a landing with a roton, but using the combination of roton and ribbon, to slow the craft down for the next event, which could be a parchute and thrusters, or just thrusters, and maybe with the assistance of the roton.

I see the roton as starting the slowdown by largely thrusting perpendicular (With canting allowed) to expand the trailing vacuum bubble.  This might help to slow the
craft down.

Then from the roton arms, from a compartment in the roton arms a ribbon deployed and allowed to trail the craft.  The twisting motion of the roton on the base of the
ribbon being expected to cause it to form a helical 3D presentation to the stream of atmosphere around it.

I do fear flapping like a flag, which although that flapping might convert spacecraft momentum to sound waves and heat, it might also tear the machine apart.

Anyway that is why I involked the roton twisting, to try to counterbalance the twisting force with the linear force of the atmospheric stream to cause a flexible ribbon
to have a 3D profile while making a high speed entry to the atmosphere.  I presume that this happens after the maximum heating event on the heat sheild of the craft.

Anyway at the upper end of the ribbon could be a container, which woud block the air stream, and help to keep the ribbon strait and not flapping.  In that compartment could be a baloon or parachute as you might like, or a thruster pack.

If it were a thruster pack, then the ribbon would remain attached to the craft all the way down, and that thruster pack way above on the ribbon would fire to keep theribbon erect and could also assist in the final landing.

Alternatelly after the ribbon and roton had slowed the craft sufficiently, they would be ejected and a parchute deployed, and finally thrusters as normal from the
bottom of the craft.

Please remember that I am way out of my normal area of thinking here, and we were asked for ideas.

Obviously a cloth ribbon of carbon-nanotubes makes me think it would be about as strong as a ribbon could be, but I am just guessing.

#8922 Re: Terraformation » Vesta, modest ambitions. » 2012-04-03 15:45:31

Yes, if you want that concept, it could be persued, but it seems to be more the end of a story about Vesta, rather than a beginning.

I am reading how hard it seems to be to land significant materials on Mars due to the fact that it has a thin atmosphere and it would almost be better if it had none.

So, I am looking at Vesta, and thinking that in fact for somewhat round worlds, it would not be likely to find an easier one to land supplies on.

Getthing there would be harder, but with patience and electric rockets, the materials could be dropped there, and when sufficiency was confirmed, a crewed vehicle could go, either a cycling spaceship, or a very fast nuclear/plasma device.

This all presumes that the dry Vesta is not totally dry, that there is some water ice.

So, I am thinking a research station/mining station/outpost the the outer solar system.  Maybe maxing out at 5000 people Plus a gene bank, in case of a social collapse of the whole solar system.  Maybe a component of a solarsystem wide radio telescope?

Experiments in surface mining, Mass driver launching of ore, Space elivators, and perhaps trying to drill down to the core of that little world and get to the heavy metals.

Of course it is also possible that a shattered core exists in the asteroid belt with all the heavy metals desired.

Anyway, the fun is in imagining walking about in your counterpressure suit, and building stuff, and robots to help you.

Just the opposite of the wet world stuff I have usually concerned myself with.

I am getting a bit Sci-Fi, in the old fashion sense.  It's kind of fun.

I am not knocking the way you see things, I am just after something else.  Perhaps the adventure, or the thought of it.

#8923 Life on Mars » Atmospheric Life in the recent past. » 2012-04-02 16:01:49

Void
Replies: 2

I bought a Discover magazine today, and read an article, "The Clouds are Alive".  The point in the article is that it seems that microorganisms high up, almost to conditions resembling Mars, and also in the clouds, serve as a catalist to freeze supercooled water.

The organisms would have to put up with UV, as this article indicates some of these organisms do.  I expect that Mars will be even harsher than our statosphere.

I am not so sure that I would believe that such organisms would be active at all or very common at least under the present conditions, except as dormant in the ice under the soil, which apparently results from snows a long time ago.

However there is fossel snow fall apparently from some thousands of years ago, when apparently the planet had a different climate.  The atmosphere might have been more hospitable to life, and even the surface.

I have recently read that Mars apparently has had a drought for 600 million years, by the evidence of lack of clay particles in the soil.

So the snowy times if they reoccur could not involve very extensive water melt.  However it is not out of the question that damp soil here and there would occur.

Then the organisms swept up in the wind, would assist the formation of snowfall to favor the survival of their own kind. 

From time to time, Meteors impact and there is ice exposed.

So, if these organisms were in that snow, perhaps that is the place to send a probe to investigate.  Either to thaw and recreate a presumed environment, and look for the organisms, or to use some other method.

I don't know if such a periodic ecosystem did exist, or if the snowfall that is in evidence was a recent one time fluke.  However, evidence in the permafrost of Siberia and Antarctica suggests that the organisms could survive for the thousands of years between episodes, in a dormant state.

So that environment might involve a atmospheric pressure of 11 mb, and snowfalls moving from the poles to the equator, and back from the equator to the poles.  During the peak of the shift, perhaps the organisms in the atmosphere would seed snow, and on occasion solar energy would reward them by making the dirty snowbanks moist with just a bit of melt water.

If the skill for causing frost existed in any such Martian life.

#8924 Re: Terraformation » Venus » 2012-04-02 15:45:37

I bought a Discover magazine today, and read an article, "The Clouds are Alive".  The point in the article is that it seems that microorganisms high up, almost to conditions resembling Mars, and also in the clouds, serve as a catalist to freeze supercooled water.

So, in a different way it might after all be possible that a microorganism could alter Venus.  The rain and snow patterns.  I presume that it does rain and perhaps snow in the atmosphere of Venus in some circumstances.

I don't know what value the alteration would have however.

The organisms would have to put up with UV, as this article indicates some of these organisms do.  I also have reservations on the existance of a place in the atmospheric column where the organisms would not be burned up by Sulphuric Acid.  I do recall that Sulphuric Acid is an Oxidant.  If in very diluted conditions, it could actually be used by an organism in place of Oxygen perhaps.  Not sure.

Anyway something to think about.

Curiously, if there were already such an organism in the atmosphere of Venus, and it could cause supercooled water to freeze and precipitate, then this could be detected from orbit.  Precipiation would occur at a higher temperature than would be expected if there were no such particles/organsms.

#8925 Terraformation » Vesta, modest ambitions. » 2012-04-02 09:40:22

Void
Replies: 35

I seems that there could be some water on Vesta, which makes it very interesting to me.

http://dawn.jpl.nasa.gov/feature_storie … _vesta.asp

Vesta is small and rocky and has a deep hole blasted into one pole I believe, exposing very deep rocks which may or may not expose valuable minerals.

I will drop my usual notions about ice covered lakes and so on.  I have already exhaused that and am not so interested anymore. (It is a good strategy for the outer solar system though).  Instead, I am interested in a place where certain "Pilot" projects could be implemented.  Ceres is going to be interesting, but really probabbly too much ice overburden, to make mining pay.

#1 being a space elevator.  I don't think it could get much easier than Vesta, and still be dealing with a object resembling a planet.

In this case, I am not intending to entertain wild notions about terraformation.  I posted here because this location has a post about Ceres, and because I do not want to fill up the more serious catagoies with wild specualtations which might detract from the focus on Mars.  "Modest intentions" is really not true, if the things I have said were actually done, that would be super ambitious.  However, modest in the sense of ambitions equivalent to current speculations for the Moon or Mars, things that might actually be possible with our abilities + a great effort to expand those abilities.

If there were a space elevator, then I guess I will go conventional and presume rotating space stations in geosynchronous orbit over Vesta, for a simulation of normal Earth or Mars or Lunar graviation, whichever is prefered.

On Vesta itself, perhaps solar energy farms, mines.  Most likely open pit mines. 

I have been told that counterpressure suits are such a wonderful option, that I suppose that other than the cold and greater radiation risk, they should be just fine on Vesta.

I wonder if unpressurized "Sky Scrapers" with steel structure, and stone "Curtain walls" would be a good option, providing moderated temperatures within, and also, some radiation protection.  (I would presume that small sections would be pressurized, and given greater radiation protection).

The whole notion being I suppose that materials of value could be extracted and shipped to Earth/Moon, or Mars/Phobos/Demos, to purchace items of value to people living in a Vesta location.

But I wonder how hard it is to get to Vesta.

Anyway, I am wondering if it would be worth it, where the Space Elevator would be first implemented there, for reason of ease, and from there, perhaps tried on Mars some distant time later, and then finally Earth.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB