You are not logged in.
Eh, it will get done eventually ??? It's a busy life...
A bit of advice: you don't need to capitalise your thread titles, you know. It doesn't make them stand out any more, no-one else does it, and it just makes them harder to read. Please don't do it for any future threads.
It would be wonderful to get more international users on these forums, atitarev, and I hope that you aren't discouraged from posting because of your English - it seems just as good as anyone else's here.
I feel that we have a good balance of people on New Mars so far and that the vast majority of discussions are good-humored and constructive, which for the Internet is pretty decent. I'd definitely encourage you to let more people around the world know about New Mars - it might even be worth setting up a special forum here for that purpose if we get enough people.
It wasn't reported because it is, as yet, a totally unreliable story. It's not a BBC News story, it's a BBC News story about a Russian TV story, and Russian media has notoriously bad standards. There are precious few details to go on, and the only attributed 'scientific' evidence there comes from a veterinary anatomist looking at pictures of X-rays, which can easily be faked - and even if they weren't, he believes they look human anyway.
There are three possibilities, which I will list from least likely to most likely.
1) It's a real Yeti
2) It's a human
3) It's a fake
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and as yet, there is no proper evidence. That is why it's not being reported, just like the news doesn't report the dozens of UFO sightings that happen around the world every day.
No worries
Moved from Human missions forum to Unmanned probes.
Moved to Unmanned Probes forum from New Mars Articles.
A very interesting point, Stu. I would liken it to the bad habit of SF authors (and others) to 'data dump' in conversations. So, for example, if the author is trying to explain what a Dyson Sphere is, instead of doing it naturally he might be lazy and 'data dump' into a character:
"As you know, Bob, Dyson Spheres were invented by Freeman Dyson back in the early 20th Century and consist of a shell around..."
There's no way anyone would say this in natural conversation, just as Stu pointed out that there's no way anyone in Dawson's Creek would be able to marshal their thoughts on emotion and life so densely and cogently.
Issue 4 is now online.
Suggestions! More suggestions, dammit!
Eh, it's well known that our Stu has written more than a few books about space and astronomy here in the UK He's far to modest to mention it himself though - I think the only evidence you can find of it is his little bio at the end of his articles here (which is sadly out of date, entirely because of me).
Jim's article is now online.
Thanks Gennaro! I fixed the spelling for you
I really have no idea why this has happened and it doesn't seem to have happened to anyone else. I'm not aware that it's a known issue with Ikonboard (although I could be wrong). Exactly what happens when you click on the 'Your messenger' link?
Issue 3 is now online!
More suggestions please! Thanks for the ones last week.
I wonder, is there any information on the web from NASA or whoever about how they've engineered rovers and landers to cope with fines? Are there any special sealants or joints that they use?
One problem is fines and dust gumming up the workings of the bike. You could always have an internal chain system but if it breaks it's much more work to fix.
That's very strange, I haven't seen it before. Maybe your mailboxes were full up?
Flag of Earth on Mars: [http://iht.com/articles/127007.html]http://iht.com/articles/127007.html
Closed at 300 posts. See 'Spirit and Opportunity 3' for more discussion.
...600 posts! Not bad
I wonder, what with all of New Mars' connections, whether we could get a brief interview with a member of the NASA MER team. I know that Joel managed to interview Steve Squyres a while back and I'm sure he must remember who New Mars is. We could certainly ask them some new questions It's a thought, anyway.
While I have immense respect for the webmasters of the MS website, because I know exactly how time-consuming and difficult it can be to maintain such a large site (and I'm not just talking about newmars.com), I agree that there is a lot of room for improvement.
The website and the homepage need to be redesigned to be more attractive and accessible to both new visitors and society members. It needs a complete graphical overhaul and it has to be updated more regularly and substantially than it is now.
*If* I had about two weeks of completely free time, all the software I needed, all the media I need in the right formats, a broad design brief and give a free rein, here's what I would do:
Change the webhost to Pair.com (more reliable and faster). Install a content management system like PMachine or Moveable Type. Design a site-wide template that adheres to web standards (XHTML 1.0 and CSS 2.0) and introduce RSS feeds of all regularly updated areas. Give chapter and group heads limited permissions to create and alter their own pages within the website. Give a number of people the ability to submit news stories to the front page. Introduce a database that contains lists of contacts and addresses.
The key thing would be to make it easier to change the website. Currently, if you want something on the website you change, you have to email the webmaster and he has to change it. Clearly this is a pretty awful state of affairs that's prone to delays. Instead, the relevant people should be able to update the website themselves. Furthermore, a website based on proper standards such as XHTML and CSS with a modularised backend such as MT or Pmachine will allow the webmaster to enact sweeping changes without having to do much more than change a template.