You are not logged in.
No one in their right mind wants to live on mars.
And I guess no one in their right mind wants to live in Antarctica - but thousands do every year.
There's more to fertile soil than just rock dust, water, and ammonium nitrate (AN). (BTW, AN is a class 1.3 mono-propellant explosive, even in fertilizer grade (a purity standard). Adding fuel oil just increases the yield. It is friction-sensitive, shock-sensitive, and can be induced to decompose (deflagrate) by heat; which in large-enough piles, can propagate into full detonation. Try justifying the shipping of THAT in interplanetary supply.) Any AN you use in agriculture on Mars needs to be locally produced. We know there's perchlorate salts there; there are probably nitrate salts as well. These are all evaporites.
You also need "organic matter", which is primarily animal/human feces, to mix with the rock dust, which feces contains both carbon-hydrogen-oxygen-nitrogen compounds plus real, live organisms (some microscopic, some macroscopic-especially in the third world). You don't have to ship the feces, any people on Mars, and any animals they bring, will supply more than can be initially used. Later on, we'll see. But in Asian rice culture, it seems to balance out pretty well.
Urine is another useful soil component, although it might prove useful to remove some of the salt first. The ammonia in it is fixed nitrogen, the very thing plants need most. Ammonia is actually better than AN in that respect, or else the mass of AN fertilizer bags would exceed the mass of tanked ammonia at rural ag-supply places; it does not.
On Mars, you are living in an environment that pressure-wise is very little different at 0.7% of an atmosphere from the vacuum of space. It should be very easy to build a vacuum flash still rig that could separate the most of the water and nearly all of the ammonia from urine, and so isolating the leftover brine as something to be disposed of by evaporation, preferably not in contact with the soil. Same thing might work in deep space travel. Not a closed ecology, but maximized recycling of what we can use.
The "clean" all-hydroponic thing as most seem to conceive it may well prove to be a technological dead end. Most of the useful plants we have are more symbiotic with the organisms in the feces than most folks want to admit. We are not yet capable of engineering plants that do not need such symbiosis long-term.
By the way, although I most definitely do not claim to be an agricultural expert, I have personally seen this process in action. It is quite real. I really do live on a cattle ranch in the midst of farm and ranch country. My wife is a trained composter. This is most definitely not theoretical knowledge from some school or some book. It is the real McCoy.
GW
GW - This is an interesting study - seems to show hydroponically grown wheat is possible and - moreover, you might do it on a recirculating nutrient cycle.
I still argue to keep it simple. Hydroponic solutions weigh quite a bit. To create them on Mars, you have to process soil to extract the minerals. Why not just let the plants do that?
For a science mission, bring an inflatable greenhouse. That's just 2 mil thick PCTFE film with fibreglass embedded for rip-stop, and with NASA's spectrally selective coating. Inflate with oxygen, and N2/Ar harvested from Mars atmosphere. Bring plastic soil trays, fill with Mars soil. Soak with water that has had Mars atmosphere bubbled through under pressure. Add some ammonium nitrate fertilizer. That is the only fertilizer a science mission will bring from Earth. A permanent settlement will make nitrogen fertilizer: ingredients are N2, water, and electricity. Plant seeds, grow crops. Simple.
As always, I think it's a question of what stage we are talking about. If we are talking about the first few missions, I think that - apart from the water - we will bring most of the growing medium with us from Planet Earth. This will be an experimental stage. We won't really rely on the farm hab - we will have enough food brought with us in various forms: energy bars, tinned food, dried food, vaccuum packed foods, frozen foods, nuts, beans etc.
Within a few years, though, we can expand the farm hab operations to include the sort of (labour intensive) work you are talking about. Eventually, once we have a enough experience, we can conduct farming relying almost fully on natural conditions on Mars.
but where do you find nutrients for the plant?
Well you can bring a lot in the form of concentrated liquid and Mars itself can supply a lot of the basic nutrients. It will be a mass-positive venture in the sense that the mass you need to bring from Earth will be far less than involved in bringing food from Earth. However, you do have to get started - that will involve quite a bit of infrastructure importation. But later you can create the farm habitats using Mars ISRU.
Lobster -
Well dwarf buckwheat can be grown in about 60 days I think. Buckwheat is perfect for making breads and pancakes.
You can grow lots of nutritious bean sprouts and water cress in a matter of days.
Also, with controlled conditions of course they receive optimal inputs of water, light and nutrients.
Wouldn't surprise me a bit to see mud polygons from an old lake bed. The public news media are full of the story about the fossil gravel bar in the steam bed.
There once was a time when Mars had a very much thicker atmosphere and warmer environment. Streams and bodies of water, all nice and "stable", just like here. The northern lowlands look an awful lot like an old ocean bottom, too.
I would think that old stream beds and lake beds would be very good places to look with a real microscope for fossil remnants of microbial life. Those odd traces in the Allan Hills meteorite might be a pretty good guide to the size and form of the things we would be looking for. Too bad Curiosity isn't equipped for that.
GW
I think they have played down the possibility of finding fossils. But surely if this is a lake bed then if there was life on Mars we could expect to find some fossil life.
What about insects? Don't you need bees and alike to pollinate flowers in order to get the fruit? Or would the astronauts use brush instead? I mean even in greenhouses on Earth people hold bumblebees for that purpose.
I understand you can use a brush. With a few people there isn't a lot of pollination to do.
Some interesting photos:
Yah, I couldn't find anything that said "liquid" water only frozen
-Koeng
So what was that drop of liquid on the Phoenix lander in the freezing north?
Seems like this site is lost...no spam control. Sad.
Feel free to post here if you want to create a website dedicated to Mars colonisation.
Why do i feel like a mushroom? Why, when I look on the raw data feeds all I get are postage stamp 8 pixel images from a 2.5 billion dollar rover? I can get better images with a 25 dollar digital camera from wal-mart.
Yea, there will be some spectacular images. the question is will we ever see them?
Good luck with all of that........ This is starting to stink.
I get the same...something to do with our computer programmes?
But yes, I do wonder quite how much energy NASA has put into improving data flow from the Mars surface. I don't believe, given all the advances in data management and digital technology that we can't do a lot better than we are doing. We should be getting streaming video from Mars in 2012, 24/7 live on the NASA website. That's what I expect for billions of dollars.
wooooow!!!
geologists popping veins all over the world!
No doubt...as a non-geologist, my thoughts are (a) that this mission is going to confirm what we pretty much know already (and we should be putting the money into a human mission to Mars) and (b) I can't wait for the camera to get up Mount Sharp and take some pics looking down - they should be spectacular with a bit of luck!
Thanks for the reminder Midoshi that heat=dust.
It is indeed a very "comfortable" landscape.
Longer term, I think the pressure for colonisation can only build as people on Earth gradually come to realise just how familiar-looking planet Mars is. Of course the really big change will come when we get some people there. I am sure Musk is working on it!
Luna 2019! Let's get back there before this decade is out!
Yes, in terms of public opinion I would favour a quick return to the Moon, but this time of course, to build a base there.
Also of note about the images showing "natural color." The sky from the raw Viking images were correctly shown with a "green" hue. I have noticed some of the images are leaning this way. If green is made by mixing blue and yellow this should be the case, sometime.
A thin haze of tan could present a yellow hue. Raleigh scattering would add a blue hue. We may not see little green men, but we should see green skies at times.
Vincent
Yes, there is a touch of green to it.
louis wrote:I've noted from NASA statements that the pics we see are enhanced to replicate earth light conditions. Would be interesting to see what the "real" light conditions are. I imagine like a rather gloomy clouded day in the northern temperate zone on Earth.
They've actually been releasing both unaltered and white balanced images for everything, though I find it's sometimes tricky to track both down. The unaltered is closer to what a person would see on Mars, but the white balanced is more useful scientifically because geologists can use their intuition based on Earth coloration and better identify interesting targets.
For example, here's an unaltered image:
http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/6760 … l_full.jpgAnd here's the white-balanced version:
http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/6760 … 3white.jpg
Wow! So breathtakingly beautiful. I can't think why humanity isn't desperate to get humans there as soon as possible. And this is just a pretty ordinary part of Mars.
Do we have any measurement of visibility/dust concentration? Seemed pretty clear on landing judging from the satellite or other above shots. But the light looks quite diffuse there in the unaltered.
Sad though the news of Armstrong's passing is, it may provide a boost to the idea of human exploration of the solar system.
Humanity may be reminded of how inspiring it was to have someone walk upon another celestial body.
I am also constantly reminded by Curiosity's stumbling progress about just how slow, stupid and cumbersome a machine is even in this day and age and how much better a few guys in a rover would do when it comes to exploring the terrain of Mars. "Strong are the arms of a man, and subtle his thought."
louis wrote:RGClark wrote:It's late southern Winter transitioning into early southern Spring on Mars.
Bob Clark
Thanks Bob. So we should see some higher temperatures in the coming weeks. Interesting.
Mars as a whole will also receive more light over the next several months at it gets closer to the Sun in its orbit. Its large eccentricity makes this a major seasonal effect, whereas it's negligible on Earth.
Thanks for that - I've noted from NASA statements that the pics we see are enhanced to replicate earth light conditions. Would be interesting to see what the "real" light conditions are. I imagine like a rather gloomy clouded day in the northern temperate zone on Earth.
louis wrote:Excellent news. Can you remind me - what season are we in on Mars? Is high summer, low summer or something else?
It's late southern Winter transitioning into early southern Spring on Mars.
Bob Clark
Thanks Bob. So we should see some higher temperatures in the coming weeks. Interesting.
Cold fusion (Low Energy Nuclear Reactions) show much greater promise. LENR is now accepted as a reality by NASA, DARPA and the EU Research Directorate among others. Hot fusion has been making promises for 50 years and going nowhere.
Just saw this posted to the www.marsroverblog.com forum:
PIA16081: Taking Mars' Temperature.
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/browse/PIA16081.jpg
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA16081PIA16080: First Pressure Readings on Mars..
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/browse/PIA16080.jpg
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA16080Note that the pressure never fell below the 6.1 mbars pressure required for pure water to remain liquid, i.e., not boil off.
Also, eyeballing the temperature graph it looks like surface temperatures remain above 0C for perhaps 3 hours per day.
Bob Clark
Excellent news. Can you remind me - what season are we in on Mars? Is high summer, low summer or something else?
I have a question forn someone who knows computers: I am transitioning to a new computer. When I log into the New Mars Forums on the new computer, it pauses, redirects, and automatically logs me back out! Basically, it means I can read, but I can never post, because I can't get logged in. I'm writing this on my old computer, but I have to give it up in a few days. Any suggestions?
Try using Firefox - free browser. ON another forum today I couldn't post in Internet Explorer but I could in Firefox.
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/msl/m … 16068.html
The pics are getting more interesting! A lot of detail on this one - I'm not a geologist but it look like wind erosion on the top of Mount Sharp.
#
Wow! That's truly awe-inspiring. Is that an unofficial production from NASA material?
Whatever, it gives a wonderful sense of the eerie beauty of Mars.
louis
So far, most of the images returned were pre-programmed testing shots to make sure everything is as it should be and there are no obstacles around the rover. That is top priority. So the ones making the "choices" are the engineers...and they did that months ago. Any scenic shots are basically accidental. Once everything checks out they will let the scientists snap pictures that are more interesting. And believe me, they are as eager as anyone to get some better shots of Mt Sharp's peak and the distant landscape.
I am not arguing about that. But once again, I think this shows NASA skewed priorities. Getting the science right is important, but getting the public on side is a whole lot more important (for future science among other things). If you show a load of gravel on the ground you get the non-scientific mass of people thinking "We paid 2 billion for that?". If you show them a world that looks familiar, they start thinking "Wow! That's amazing...looks just like Earth"...and then a lot of them start daydreaming "Wish I could go there, make a fresh start...wouldn't it be nice to have a whole planet to yourself..." It's completely subjective and non-scientific but it creates and entirely different atmosphere in which public funding decisions are made.