New Mars Forums

So was the Iran's Shah, he was ousted by a supported by the clerics popular revolt, I wouldn't rely as you do on the strenght of an unpopular leader if his army gets infiltrated by islamic extremists, so what if fanatics takes the power in Karachi ?

Best thing to do is to insure Iranian friendship, maybe next time there will be an earthquake or something like that, if an Iranian should read what you say, he would more eagerly again want nukes to defend his country from you warmonging.
In this way, your call on attacking Iran isn't as different as a Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's call to destroy Israel or USA, I see some of a symetric attitude

The answer is up to who will be soldiers, their parents and relatives, saloon strategists love to play with human lives as if they were just jacks on the chessboard

That's awful. I do condemn such acts.
Just notice that Israelis' retaliations are as wild for a civilian killed in Israel as for a a soldier killed in occupied territory.

False accusation, I did support Gulf war one, I support war at the talebans and at the terrorists. I don't support "great Israel" and the Israel "right" to occupy other peoples' land out of the internationaly recognized fronteers of Israel.
I have prejudices at warmoning behaviour.

Up to now, as long as it's not born, a human being has no legal existence, and a foetus is called a foetus, be by left wingers or not, it's the rightwing attitude to call a "baby" a foetus as an euphemism up to dictate to women as they should act, the bunch of moral cowards, as you say, applies on rightwingers too.
In this case, it's up to each woman to deal with her own moral and ethic, personnaly, I'm opposed to abortion, but I'm not in a woman's body, and I don't feel any right to tell her how she must behave.
I'm not a biologist, but I think that as long as a foetus hasn't an organised nervous system built, it cannot think, it cannot feel pain, and therefore cannot be a conscious being. Killing an inconcious being isn't killing a baby.

And you will notice that, as a foreigner, I take more care on my english than yourself.  euphanisms doesn't exist in any english dictionnary, so much for the peoples which are supposed to butcher the english language.
Anyways, I don't intend to speak or write english like an englishman or like an US american, I know that my sentences are built as by a latin and french educated man. The main is to be understood by english speaking peoples.

That won't do anything, you can kill all of the iranian civil authorities, the real power is in the mosques, Ahmadinejad is just a mollahs' puppet. 
The Iranians can hide ultracentrifugers in any suburb basement, you can't find them just by satellite spying, so you will have to invade Iran by earth to search on the ground, and you don't have enough military means unless you mobilise one million men to invade and control a 70 millions inhabitants country large a 3 Texas, when security isn't even assumed for your troops in Iraq.

That's just your brutal and idle terrorism fueling yakety-yak, as usual 

When Arafat and Israel were negociating peace, colonisation never stopped, I did condemn the palestinian "right to return" meaning that Israel would long-term be overflown by Arabs, but there couldn't be any trust from Palestinians as long as the official and wild settlements lasted.
Your solution, punish "terrorism" don't mean any thing, we aren't at "war on terror", this stupidity has shown its couterproductivity for three long years.

We're at war at terrorists, first thing to do is to avoid conditions which fuel terrorism, then identify and streak terrorists in their nests, turn a whole population into terrorits' supporter as well as weakening the moderate palestinian leaders are the worth thing to do, destroying palestinian Arafat side turned the population towards hamas.

So please, stop supporting the retaliations way, the one that leads to US and Israel international isolation.
That's enough ! Only improvements in the palestinian conditions of life can help peace, collective punishment is nazi type behavoiur, anyways. Germans had collective punishments by Bremen, Hamburg, Dresden massive bombings bound to kill and terrorize as many civilians as possible, that did rather fuel a sharp german resistance will rather than break the population support for the Nazis.
We aren't in a movie and you aren't Inspector Harry

While you're childishly chatchatting, Congressmen are taking care of balancing "free-trade" dirtorsions, and US jobs...

http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL33317.pdf

I'm just telling you what can the differences between legend written years after facts and facts.
like an angry chick, you would say anything stupid just to hast the last word in a family dispute.

That's what's called an occupied territory.
Everybody knows the price of peace is a palestinian state on these occupied territories.
As long as Israel occupy these territories, there will be a liberation conflict.
Your are just justifying an everlasting war

Ramesses II (also known as Ramesses the Great and alternatively transcribed as Ramses and Rameses *Ria'mīsisu) was an Egyptian pharaoh of the Nineteenth dynasty. He was born ca. 1302 BC.
Pyramids were built about 2500 BC, no use to keep on your ignorant's arguing ! Jews could definitively NOT work on pyramids more than a millenium before and nowhere in the Bible nor Torah is mentionned any pharaoh, it's just always called "Pharaoh"

Anyways, Moses childhood's legend is a copy of Sargon II childhood story :

http://history-world.org/legend_of_sargon.htm

Buoyant baskets were traditionnal in Mesopotamia, Egyptians had no asphalt as in Mesopotamia to make a basket waterproof, Egyptians would have built a Nile reeds raft instead, so that the legend of baby Moses found in a basket by the Pharaoh's favorite then becoming Pharaoh's advisor is probably more pure fairy tale than a historic fact.
Same kind of historical fake with the Romolus and Remus grown up by a she-wolf legend; in latin, "lupa" she-wolf, also means prostitute, but it's so much less prestigious and fantastic if the two glorious roman twins could have been rose by a prostitute

My argument applies on th recent jew immigration in OCCUPIED TERRITORY COLONIES since 1967, which are illegal in regard of the international laws, don't you bring your Israel's fondators.

Whatever your says are, the isaraeli occupation of these territories is since 40 years the source of state of war

Anyways, I' a proud ennemy of the Evangelists !

KMT still remains the main Taiwan's political party

You find a picture adress on the web, copy it, press img insert the adress then press img again   

We'd like better that the Israelis won't renew on our troops such "regrettable mistakes" such as
Beit Hanoun "artillery mistake"
or
Israel's Attack on the USS Liberty

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Liberty_incident
http://www.unitedstatesgovernment.net/i … iberty.htm

No, not untill Israel doesn't say that it will remove with a planified and respected calendar all its colonies settled by force on the palestinian territory as they did for Gaza as soon as all the palestinians parties will have recognised Israel. One shot at Israelis will give to Israel the right to delay the colonies removal. If not, the state of war is kept by Israel because the occupation is a state of war at the occupied people.
If you step on my foot for  too long a moment, I've told you that's hurts me, you press louder, my right is to punch you off, as well as you have the right to fire at someone which intends to settle upon your property against your will
There is plenty of room in the Neguev desert to settle colonies, state of war is much more costful than desalinate water to have a flourishing desert.
As a martian colonisation supporter you should admit that terraforming the Neguev desert is much more a valuable expense than being at war at your neighbourhood.

Wah !  You're caught showing obvious historical, may be hysterical, ignorance 
The Torah leaves the identity of this Pharaoh unstated, the pyramids were built about 2500 BC, and Moses is supposed to have leave Egypt about 1500 BC
The Jews weren't in Egypt when the Pyramids were built. They is not the slightest evidence of any jewish presence when ancient egyptians built great Pyramids.

In no ways ancient Egyptians would have let impure hands work on their sacred places, same for the middle-age cathedrals builders which would never had let a non christian work on churches' building.

Even wearing leather sandals was forbiden, because an average egyptian fellah could ever hope for his kid to become a clark if his kid's intelligence was noticed by a clergyman, and because impure jobs as butchery, whool weaving, leather working looked like impure, ancient Egyptians which were mainly farmers did abandon theses jobs to Hebrews or other nomad tribes which were mainly sheep breeders.

When the yearly river Nile inondation flooded over cultivated fields, there were hundreds thousand free hand egyptians fellahs ready to go to work on Pyramids as a religious duty, rewarded by meals and seeds bags, that was much more free hands than needed for the Pyramids building yards.

The Jews couln't have written a holly book without having an alphabet based on hierogliphyc origin which in not find in anyways in the hebrew alphabet , influenced by Hyksos civilisation.

Therefore what you write about the legend of jew slaves working on Pyramids is just a fake showing your obvious ignorance of Egytology

The other point is that nobody can be guilty for his so-called ancestors'acts committed more than four milleniums and a half ago, if you grief today's Palestinians or Arabs for some fantasmatic misbehaviour from ancient Egytians at the ancient Jews, either you are a mad guy, or you don't realize the stupidity of your arguments: if you want biblical arguments, guess to which country three jews nowadays called as Joseph, Mary and Jesus routed to shelter far from Herod's wrath ?

The first violence is 40 years of israeli occupation on palestinian territory
The following map shows what is palestinian territory left surrounded by the grey israeli occupation zone. You have not understod where stands the injustice, and that occupied peoples have the legitimate right to attack occupiers.

Just try to realise the map scale, this pelestinian territory is less than 35 miles wide.
That's not the first time I link at occupation map. You dont want to understand, that's why terrorists take this as a pretext for the 9/11 attack, because USA is the only country which as some influence on Israel and does about nothing to oblige Israel to scarp off.

You shouldn't have pushed an unwanted democracy.
It takes time to peoples with clanish traditions to get used to democratic processes. Many countries have the appearance of democracy, have vote, and once leaders have power, they abuse the populations with power, favour their own clans, that's a fact, not a racist point of view, as it is a fact that Hitler went to power thanks to peoples' vote.
Democracy isn't a guaranty against dictatorship, say the contrary is just naive. Democracy often follows welfare state. Hungry peoples don't care about democracy, they want to eat first and will follow any kind of a leader which promises food.

It's not a liberal position that set my opinion on Iraq, but the french intelligence services repports saying that if Saddam was toppled with a war, the situation in Iraq would become out of control. The Sunnis had weapons, the US administration gave weapons to the Kurds and the Shias, with as a result, an unavoidable civil war. The facts are more tenacious than your american dreams of worlwide democracy.

Job hasn't been finished in Afghanistan, where Europeans are involved too. There, the money spent in Iraq would have been essential to make of this operation a succes, now we have 2 big problems to solve, not including Pakistan where north eastern provinces are out of control, while Iran and North Korea toughen attitude because of this all failure.

Bush demonized himself when going at war with lies on WMD, against 75% of the western Europe public opinion he didn't care of, and each time there have been a vote, the european leaders which allied Bush in opposition of each public opinion were punished. That's well done!
Democracy is also the respect of the peoples' will.

It's quite insane from you to keep on a failing point of view on middle east politics when even Bush recognizes that the situation is really unpleasant and fires the main responsible for this failure.

At first, USA weren't given the Iraq problem to solve, the Us administration took it, thinking that the Us troops would be welcome as liberators, this without the most of the world consent, among which all the arab countries.

You got it.
In fact, Saddam and the Sunnis didn't govern Iraq alone, they had agreements with some of the Shia factions, and some other religious minorities as the christian Iraqis.
The Iraqi peoples didn't support terrorism at the West, didn't endanger any foreign visitor. Now, they do. The Iraq war fueled terrorism.