You are not logged in.
That's nice, but what do I do after "save as" -- ?? And would that even work HERE, considering a web page link has to be typed in at the Avatar Options section??
It works here. Are you having trouble finding the image on your harddrive? If you are, right click the avatar again and take note of which directory its in. If your just using default settings it should be "my documents" under "my pictures." Or you can just take note of the name of the file and use the "find" feature (found by pressing the "start" key in the lower left corner of your screen) to locate it. If there's some weird technical problem keeping you from saving it, I saved it for you. When you want it just yell and I'll send it yer way.
2. That any degree of totalitarian control is exactly the same as the American system because... wait for it... we have laws. Yep. We've got laws against drunk driving, he wants mandatory birth control; it's all the same, right?
Yep, and don't forget that we may freely trample free speech and kill freedom of political expression because it's illegal to yell "fire" in a crowded building. Apparently some people don't distinguish between fraud which is a malevolent act against an individual or an organization and the right to merely express one's opinions.
*Hi Josh. Your sentence seems, to me,
incomplete. "Strategically placed" -- what?
I think Josh was talking about strategically placing giant magnets about Mars to simulate a magnetic field to protect the atmosphere. I think we should turn the agricultural areas into parks that could serve both recreational and food producing services. Lounging around in an area rife with fruit trees and fish ponds could be good for the soul.
As a side note, how hard would it be to start seeing what plants we could take and what supporting plants/insects/animals would we need? Has anyone done any work on this or knows anyone who has?
We could probably build something of a Mars simulation chamber and experiment with different plants to see what works best. I think there will be a place for bees on Mars as they help to both pollinate plants and make food. Honey could make a good alternative to sugar if we don't want to take up greehouse space with plants that soley produce sugar.
What ever became of Robert Zubrin's plan to fly a Mars sample return mission with in situ resource utilization/in situ propellant production? The people who have read "The Case for Mars" will know what I'm talking about.
Dan Goldin was a supporter of this idea but NASA seems to have settled for the risky MOR (Mars Orbital Rendezvous) mission plan. Why???
Good point. If we're hell bent on a Mars sample return mission we should at least try out some technologies that would be applicable to a manned mission. Also, using the in-situ propellant to return to Earth would eliminate the need for the sample capsule to dock with a Earth-return craft in space. The Mars bound ship could just leave directly for Earth provided it was able to produce enough fuel.
Unless aliens put up big "lifeless planet" movie sets around our probes to keep us from looking at their civilization, there are no multicellular organisms on Mars (and probably no microbes except transplanted Earth ones either). No hosts means no pathogens.
I don't believe there are pathogens on Mars either, especially ones that would infect people. I was merely trying to counter the argument that we need a sample return to insure there are no deadly diseases awaiting us.
So it seems that a reasonably complete sample return program might involve a half dozen missions spread over, say, 2016 to 2020 (two per launch window), and costing maybe $9 billion. If we insist on this program before we send humans, Mars exploration will end up on the back-burner for many decades to come. And it ISN'T necessary!
Hang on a minute! .... Where did I put that soap-box?! Ah yes ... there it is! ....
Oh God, we might have to wait until 2020 for just a sample return mission? If that's the case I think we'll all be in our final resting places before we see boot prints marking up the Martian surface. And hey, I think you should step on that soapbox more often!
I have to say I'm not a big fan of the Da Vinci concept either. Lifting a rocket high into the atmosphere with a balloon just isn't aesthetically pleasing to me. But I guess if it works it works. Sometimes the best solutions are the ugliest ones. I never thought about the possibility of strong winds carrying the balloon off on strange trajectories. It seems to add a highly unpredictable element. I visited their website about a month ago and they were thinking of using their rockets to get people to extreme altitudes so they can skyjump. I'd love to try sky diving from 50,000 feet.
Will terraforming Mars to this extent truly be possible? Can a food chain and ecosystem be manipulated into a viable, living thing? It's a staggering concept.
--Cindy
Terraforming would be an extremely difficult and long process but it's certainly not impossible. Just look at Earth, 4 billion years ago it was nothing like it is today. Higher animals would have no chance of surviving there. It was only after primitive life had "terraformed" the planet that the conditions that higher life depends on came into existence. I pretty much hold to the viewpoint that if something's within physical laws it isn't truly impossible even though it might be extremely improbable or close to impossible. Personally though I think I'm falling in with the "red" crowd when it comes to terraforming. I think it's just easier and more practicle to build giant areas and make them habitable then to terraform an entire planet.
We spend billions on education, should we just take a billion or two from that?
Considering the record of state education, how about diverting all of it to other uses?
Uh oh A.J., I think your stepping into another mine field. Personally I'd rather just work on getting people to Mars than to waste time trying to create all of these nifty robots that go out and play geologist. I was reading about some of the stunts they were planning to pull off with the sample return mission and its amazing the feats they want to do. It seems unduly complicated and prone to failure. People say we need this mission not only to search for life but to ensure that we don't end up infecting our astronauts and/or wiping out humanity when they return, but a little sample return mission won't be able to fully catalog the pathogens that exist on Mars anyway. Their scope is too limited.
I'm betting on the Starchaser team. If all goes well they're planning their first manned flight in early 2003 and it probably won't be to long after that that they get their X-prize qualified vehicle ready. That Canadian team might beat them to it though. I'm guessing one of those two teams will be the winnder.
Then it hit me!
Why, at the mention of 70,000 Australian fruit cakes (who think they're Jedi knights), did my name spring so readily to mind?!!Hmmm? .... Well? .... I'm waiting ...... !!!!!
umm, ummm...
In time, assuming we don't botch it by being sidetracked by terminal pessimists with a complete lack of vision, it's going to happen. One way or another, sooner or later...
I sometimes wonder if civilization will end up being derailed and destroyed by the terminal pessimists as you aptly put it. Such cynicism seems to grow like small pox among people. I think it's possible a lot of potentially starfaring societies have given in to the doom mongers and misanthropes of their times and stayed on their little planets until their sun boiled off the oceans and wrapped their world in a Venusian hell. Just my opinion of course.
We have integrated old bacterial parasites in the past, and now they are endosymbiotic organel inside our cells: the mitochondria and they give us most of our metabolism. Martians still have a future !
ka !
Fascinating points. I never thought about the possibility of the genetic info of a Martian organism merging with our own. Even though such a merger might help keep Martian genetic codes alive do you think it has much of a chance of helping people to better adapt to the Martian environment? After all we'd almost have to redesign our bodies from the ground up to survive any of the conditions on Mars. I guess evolution could steal some of factors of the microbes that helped them survive and integrate them with us somehow. And personally I hope Martian life has very little in common with Earth life. I'd like to see evidence that Martian life developed independently of Earth life. If Earth and Mars life (if it has life) are obviously related it'll just take us back to square one and still not answer the question of how likely life is to form on planets independently.
Gosh fellas!
I guess NovaMarsollia is right.
Our imperialistic, militaristic, industrial mind-set ... embracing widespread poverty, inequality and the destruction of the environment, may be flawed after all.
I can't believe how blind we've been to the truth!
Our position is so demonstrably indefensible in the face of such progressive socialist wisdom, that maybe we should just fold our tents and head back to the Middle Ages!
Shaun, do I sense some sarcasm and blasphemy here!!! I guess scrubbing the pictures of our beloved leaders at the re-education camp didn't quite convince you of the truth of our political philosophies. Yep, I think your going to be the special project.
There is a little known technology called the Inertial Drive, which converts the angular momentum of splitting matter into forward thrust. It requires no fuel, merely electrical energy, is capable of huge thrust output, and can lift itself off of earth.
Maybe I'm misunderstanding something, but if the inertial drive breaks apart matter to create thrust, wouldn't it need to carry some kind of "fuel" to break apart with electrical energy? Or would it be able to just suck in air and break that apart?
*I've grown cynical enough to think the only thing those old farts "on the hill" are interested in DOING are their interns.
LOL! Ain'ts thats the truth! There's two things I really despise about the space program in its current implementation: it's dependence on short sighted politicians to approve everything it does, and second, these stupid cost-plus schemes that totally steer the program away from cost effectiveness and ultimately gets everything killed because the price tags are too high. Of course we'll have to live with point one forever, but somebody needs to chuck the cost-plus scheme. The contractors will cry foul and say they're a special case that should keep recieving outrageous amounts of money for work done because of XYZ factors, but such a system has to go because it's simply abused by the contractors and gives them little incentive to keep costs low.
2. Easy access to an assured supply of water right on the surface, for fuel and life support.
I'm not sure about this part. I know there's water ice at the poles, but does it exist in such an amount that the crew could provide for all of their water and fuel needs by just harvesting the ice next to the hab? They might have to go far and wide in order to collect enough water since much of the cap is CO2 ice. Then again I have to admit I haven't really read up on the ice caps much so I could be completely wrong.
Robs, you've been inspired. Actually I like your plan better than Zubrin's. Assuming we can pull off the agricultural and Phobos untilization feats you mentioned, it would probably prove easier and cheaper to keep a manned Mars base alive than a Moon bound one. And I also agree that its best to design these missions around launchers that actually exist at the moment if possible. Hey, have you thought about writing a book, I'll buy it.
I came across an article over at the CNN website that claimed the Russians were thinking of pulling out of the ISS project because they couldn't keep up with expenses. If the Russians were to totally turn their back on the project do you think the ISS would live on or would it become an orbiting ghost town or cinders in the ocean?
LONDON (Reuters) - Science fiction's "Jedi" warriors and "Klingon" bad guys have entered the newest edition of the Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, along with "asylum seekers," "asymmetrical warfare" and "spin control."
Speaking of Jedi warriors, I read an article in the paper recently that 70,000 people in Australia claimed to be Jedi on the national census. Hmm, I wonder if Shaun is attuned to the force.
You wrote, "I think we're operating under the assumption that all of the colonies that develop on Mars will be governed by the same body, and I don't think that necessarily will be the case." I disagree with your assumption. I believe that each colony should have its own "local" government and that there should only be regional and/or planetary governmental structures if the colonies join together to form those superior governmental structures.
Scott
I think we're getting into territory where there are too many variables involved to really make a case one way or the other. I think the most important variable that could influence the way government evolves on Mars is how accessible space becomes to people. If we develop the technology where people can just fling themselves to the red planet without a lot of government interference it's perfectly conceivable that a quiltwork of vastly different political systems will form on Mars. But on the other hand, if governments continue to hold a near absolute monopoly on space and dictate who and who may not go to Mars and where on Mars they may go, I think your scenario will be more likely to be played out since in that case Mars colonies will likely spread out from a "mother colony" rather than a lot of little colonies being formed independent of each other. It just depends on how government policy and technology evolves.
I wonder if we could just produce a calendar based on something other than seasons/day cycles that could be used for the entire Solar System. If we develop numerous colonies all through space it's going to get hellish trying to keep track of all of these calendars and making your time correspond to theirs. I already have enough of a headache trying to figure out what the time in X time zone is compared to the time in Y zone. I guess I got horribly off topic, but I don't really like Zubrin's plan for a calendar, I think we should work on something more universal, but perhaps that's impossible.
During the French Revolution, Voltaire's remains were exhumed, as were those of Jean-Jacques Rousseau. They were given elaborate state funerals and laid to rest in the Pantheon. When the French Revolution took a turn for the very worst, the remains of Voltaire and Rousseau were removed from the Pantheon by an angry mob, tossed together [!] into a bag and thrown away. Voltaire is once again enshrined at the Pantheon, but not with any of his remains.
--Cindy
I've definately been filled with urban myths concerning the life of Voltaire. I thought that after he died his body was immediately taken by the authorities and dragged through sewage. Where the hell do I hear these things? Even though I've read my fair share of philosophers I've only had a scant introduction to Voltaire's philosophy and know practically nothing about his personal life.
Yes, you may need to use cleated tires, rather like snow tires in winter on Earth.
Driving on Phobos; now that would be a challenge! The gravity is something like 6/10,000 of Earth.
Ouch! I hope when you go driving all over Phobos you don't do it with cleated tires. Anyhow, it could be scary driving on Phobos. One big bump and Mars might find itself with a new moonlet.
Hidden messages show thyself! (place holder post)
Even though I found the idea of building a space station at the libration points interesting, I wonder how worthwhile that really is. Oh well, if NASA and its political leash holders finally gets the initiative to send people zooming around the Solar System they can build bases at the libration points to their hearts content. One thing I found somewhat disturbing though was how the author indicated that building such a L-base would lead us not to fly just one mission to Mars but two or three! Whatever happened to a sustained effort to keep people there indefinately. I think NASA has tossed the vision of Mars Direct out the window. On the flip side though I got the impression they did want to build something of an indefinately staffed base on the moon, so that's good.
Maybe it's just me, but it seems that everything that would be neccessary to place a human presence on the moon can be translated and used for mars exploration and colonization.
Not necessarily. The environmental conditions on Mars are far different than those on the Moon. Sure, going to the moon is good in its own right, but we dont need to go there in order to pull off a Mars mission. After all we can test the equipment used for a manned Mars mission on Earth the same way we would test equipment used for a manned presence on the Moon (actually a lot of the more experimental technology we'd use for Mars like fuel generators would be absolutely useless on the moon anyhow.) And there's already ample data on the psychological and other human factors concerns that could come into play during a Mars mission. Of course if we decide to go back to the Moon it could make a nice proving ground in some areas, but I don't think we should go to the moon soley to test out methods for living on Mars.
I grew more and more detached from all this, and happened to read a preacher's statements regarding an man from the 18th century named Voltaire. This preacher was commenting negatively on Voltaire, but happened to mention something which caught my eye and stayed in my mind: According to this preacher, Voltaire had been afraid mankind would indeed bring Armageddon upon himself...but only via what would today be termed "self-fulfilling prophecy."
Wow, considering your not-so-favorable opinions on religion I never would have guessed that it was the words of a preacher that sparked your curiosity. Voltaire would probably be impressed by such a story of someone finding the strength to overcome what they've been taught as holy truth and basically reject it because they find it unreasonable. Anyways, is it true that Voltaire's last words were "What, flames already?" when someone lit a candle next to his deathbed? I don't remember where I heard that so it's probably some urban myth but I don't know.
The next time you read the name "Skinner," imagine that you are in a Skinnerbox with a 1 hour timer lock on the exit door. You are trapped for one hour. Also imagine that the box has a lever that you can push down and that a 1-ounce pure gold coin rolls out of a slot each time that you push the lever down. You will want to be wearing clothes that have lots of big pockets. You've got one hour. Good luck!
Scott
LOL, it might change those images in my head but I'm not sure if I could bring myself to step into something called a skinnerbox in the first place! :0