You are not logged in.
The Cosmonautics Academy has outlined the general concept for space activities in 2005-2035. The report provides a guideline for reforming the system of planning and regulation of space activities, crucial technologies allowing Russia to preserve its status as the leading space power.
MAIN GOAL OF RUSSIAN COSMONAUTICS - INCREASING NATIONAL DEFENCE CAPACITY
http://en.rian.ru/rian....alert=0
Well congratulation to SpaceShipOne and to Its owners for having achieved the goal. But to all thoses that have partial or nearly complete vehicles keep going.
We all know the direction that SpaceShipOne and the free enterprise industry has in store with the announcement of virgin getting into the space flight game.
Also there is the announcement of the http://www.xpcup.com/ to continue on the excitement of the xprize in the coming year.
In addition we have the Bigelow LEO prize still of which they are ironing out the prize amount and looking for more funds to go with his pridged amount of 25 million.
edit:
http://www.spacedaily.com/
A day after rocketship SpaceShipOne on Monday won a 10-million-dollar prize aimed at kickstarting space tourism, there appears to be no shortage of wealthy adventurers keen to be first to blaze a trail into the galaxy. Around 125 hard-line space junkies have already paid more than 100,000 dollars for tickets for a short trip on the world's first commercial spaceliners, years before the first passengers will be ushered aboard
Alot of the delay will ride on how quickly they can repair the Nasa facilities and to how soon after they can get back to working on the remaining CAIB recommendations before flights can occur.
Here is also a thought for the exploration after sending robotic missions.
How about sending a nuclear submarine and a dome shaped floating habitat once man could go.
On a side note I started a thread on the Earths ocean why have we not colonized them.
I think the two water worlds have much in common in the way that we must go about exploration of each.
Does any one know the light properties if it were used to make panels for a green house with regards to plant growth.
This also was talked about under the glass topic a why back under life support.
Compressed air is used to run a lot of short term use items in many auto repair shops. So why not intergrate it into normal mission use as well a rover sounds very feasable since it has a lot of stop and go motion allowing for it to regenerate the compression needed for using it to propel the vehicle.
Great concept for inventive supplemental financing, with gradual upgrades to the service one could even charge more for what is recieved.
And I have to ask who would live in a rather dark undersea base or a gleaming modern surface town. (apart from me)
I think you hit it with regards to colonizing other worlds. Living in a bubble not able to go out side of it. Makes wanting to do it not so atractive for many. So those that are not die hard fans of space say why bother investing all that money for it, if it has no practical purpose other than to do science.
I guess the point I was trying to make was that even though we have the oceans right here for us to occupy, even though we have the technology and the sciencetific desire to explore ant to learn about them. We chose to not because it is hard to do, it requires great infrastucture to use everday and that what we have are depend on earth resources rather than becoming selfsufficient.
I view any exploration of the moon and even any of the other possible teraforming planets much in the same way. Going for science is only part of the equation to for fill, with colonization the second part. But they need to go hand in hand at the same time or we will never colonize anything permanently. What will be built will be temporary structures to support the science and once the money goes away all will go with it for a time until some one or something happens to change everyones view point on what needs to be achieve by exploring.
The china of imature space seems to be changing everyday, Nasa needs to get closer if it should want to make better use of partners in space exploration.
Not so innocents abroad: China returns to the International Astronautical Congress
http://www.thespacereview.com/article/237/1
As many of the threads for exploration, ship concepts and such have indicated that there is a need for differing vehicles for cargo versus those for man to use for any and all destinations of the future.
Splitting Cargo and Crew
http://www.astrobio.net/news....thold=0
New Horizons Set To Launch With Minimum Amount of Plutonium
The spacecraft will use the plutonium in a radioisotope thermal generator (RTG), a long-lived nuclear battery. RTGs transform heat from decaying plutonium pellets into electricity to power science instruments, computers and other flight systems.
http://space.com/spacenews/businessmonday_041004.html
NASA is still targeting a January 2006 launch of the New Horizons Pluto probe after the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) confirmed it can deliver most of the nuclear fuel the spacecraft will need for its 10-year mission.
In September, Senate appropriators, noting that the paucity of plutonium has jeopardized the Kuiper Belt tour, added $4 million to the NASA budget bill last month to pay for a study of the feasibility and likely cost of launching a so-called New Horizons 2 mission relatively soon.
Time of mission is also a factor when it comes to crew size but also with regards to the time allocated for doing the science per quantity of personnel needed to carry it out and maybe time sensitive to how fast it must be done with said same quantity of crew.
Overlapping missions is a must, which also means that they at least must land at the same site to make the most out of the man power to carry things out.
The unofficial news sources have it delayed until May. Thanks for not hurricane season 2004 but NASA Florida it may not be over just yet. when your winds still blow even though the months of November some years.
Hurricane Damage Delays Shuttle's Return To Flight Until May
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/shuttle-04zi.html
It appears that Da Vinci team has finally made the final hurdles and may actually get to start there rocket but no launch date has been set yet. Transport Canada's Launch Safety Office said it had granted a permit for the team. The application is valid for two launches between October 2, 2004 and November 1, 2004. Last link has the launch safety conditions.
Canada Still Has Eyes on X Prize
http://www.wired.com/news/space/0,2697, … _tophead_3
DA VINCI TEAM APPLICATION APPROVED BY TRANSPORT CANADA
http://www.tc.gc.ca/mediaroom/releases/ … -h054e.htm
I was reading a Community Commentary titled:
Now it is time for us to discover our planet’s oceans
http://www.fosters.com/October_2004/10. … 02_04b.asp
Quote:
The United States has made breathtaking progress in space science and exploration. We landed on the moon and can now claim a much greater understanding of our solar system. We have even detected the presence of water on Mars. Its time we took on the last unexplored frontier: the oceans. Oceans cover some 70 percent of this planet yet vast expanses - almost 90 percent - remain unknown.
end quote:
This made me think about our many threads on teraforming, using celestial bodies from asteriods to comets, moons and much more.
We would mostly like to make bases on some if not all of the above meantioned. We know of some of the hardships and the overall costs to do a little explorations in the name of science. We also have talked about infrastucture needded to pull it off.
Here we have the last explored frontier on Earth and we have barely scratched its surface in the name of science and of exploration.
Nasa has used it for some simulations and for training for missions in space.
Learning how to construct a base in the oceans would be vary simular to having no atmospher or to even one that is toxic to breath. Why not make more use of it also as an Earth bond means to make this planet the next stepping stone to space as well.
We have much more to learn before we can go so lets make the most of what we have.
While much research has and is on going it making Mars more hospitable or at least into how we might survive if we go.
reference site
http://www.marsonearth.org/
The bush kerry view on science.
http://www.nasawatch.com/archives/000245.html#more
ESA presses on with relations with Russia. ESA’s Permanent Mission to Russia was established nine years ago through an agreement, signed on 10 April 1995, between the European Space Agency and the Government of the Russian Federation. The mission, which is located in Moscow, has diplomatic status and is registered with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
ESA’s Permanent Mission in Russia
http://www.esa.int/esaCP/SEMC3NMKPZD_index_0.html
A new site launched today showcases the activities of ESA’s Permanent Mission in Russia. To learn more about it, visit www.esa.int/emo.
While not quite on topic it is however is about the history as told by another of those Nasa insiders.
Exploration and History Come Together on NASA Web Portal
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2004/se … story.html
Essay: The Importance of Exploration
This is the first in a series of essays on exploration by NASA's Chief Historian, Steven J. Dick.
http://www.collectspace.com/news/news-100104a.html
"Bush Wants To Go To Mars"
An ProjectConstellation.US editorial exclusive, wrote to express frustration about the repeated use of this phrase by pundits, politicians, and the public.
No problem it is always good to be reminded anyway
but at the time I was looking at what modules were left to be placed into orbit and of any possible cancellations due to shuttle timeline to retirement. In additions to which ones might be off loaded to alternative launch vehicles.
I too am very surprized by this, since your nation is an allied aurgg... probably misspelled.
Best part of this is:
Aurora is a pan European bid to explore the solar system, bring back rock samples from Mars, and possibly even send a manned mission to the Red planet by 2033.
More on the starting article just another link to info.
UK backs Aurora Euro space programme
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/10/01/space_yes/
What I hope most though for is that all teams that are building rockets to compete in this contest do not stop just because the prize is won but continue on with their designs and push on for the orbital prise that is to come.
When I first posted this topic had opened it with:
In Many of the discusions of topics we come back to what did the president mean by first the Moon and then beyound. To use the moon as a stepping stone to space. To sustain a Moon project does this mean a base, colonization and or can it be one shot after the other with nothing permanent ever built. We can keep looking a startup cost as well as the long term cost but are they really what is important to exploration.
If we go to the moon should we be looking to develope self sufficiency and less dependence on Earths resources. Should the moon be the next Launching pad to beyound? The questions keep coming or going and even Nasa is looking for information as to what is meant in the commissions report.
But since that time I have looked at the only model we have to follow in a word Apollo...
So what science value can we achieve by going back robotically or by manned mission?
How many robotic mission must be sent to the moon to prepare the way for man to practice the skills needed for Mars?
How many times will we go before we have Practiced enough?