You are not logged in.
The Space Commercial Human Ascent Serving Expeditions Act
AKA the Space CHASE Act
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewsr.html?pid=13632
Snipet:
"The Congress finds that--
(1) the goal of opening space to the American people and their private commercial, scientific, and cultural enterprises should guide Federal space investments, policies, and regulations;
(2) private industry has begun to develop commercial launch vehicles capable of carrying human beings into space, and greater private investment in these efforts will stimulate the Nation's commercial space transportation industry as a whole;
(3) space transportation is inherently risky;
(4) a critical area of responsibility for the Office of the Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation is to regulate the emerging commercial human space flight industry; and
(5) the public interest is served by creating a clear legal and regulatory regime for commercial human space flight.
end snipet:
We are on the verge of allowing for the first time not only governments but the private industry and the people who have the desire to gain access into space. Who knows were we will be in a few years or even a decade or two but the real journey will take a small step forward if it is ever signed into Law in the right direction. To allow more people to become more involved in all facets of the exploration vision. ![]()
Info on ongoing research by nasa on propulsion design.
Redesigning Rockets: NASA Space Propulsion Finds a New Home
http://www.space.com/businesstechnology … 40811.html
FYI for those that have not found it yet.
Android top pick to aid Hubble; Dubbed "Dextre," the Canadian robot would blast off on an Atlas 5 or Delta 4 rocket in late 2007 and then outfit the $3 billion observatory with fresh batteries and gyroscopes as well as two new $100 million science instruments.
http://www.flatoday.com/news....FIX.htm
Lots of details in the article.
Happy reading all.
FYI for those that have not found it yet.
Android top pick to aid Hubble; Dubbed "Dextre," the Canadian robot would blast off on an Atlas 5 or Delta 4 rocket in late 2007 and then outfit the $3 billion observatory with fresh batteries and gyroscopes as well as two new $100 million science instruments.
http://www.flatoday.com/news....FIX.htm
Lots of details in the article.
Happy reading all.
comstar03
I like the thoughts in Example 2 : LEO and Lunar Development
I do feel that we should be doing more than we are with an orbiting platform in the ISS.
Learning how to do all sort of construction techniques in less gravity or in none is important to any base survival on the moon or on Mars.
We must learn how to do things the old fashion way anew in order to keep all the high tech stuff working longer.
I think spacing out the man power of the crew over many years does not help with the base or of science. I would send as you noted all the supplies and the Habitat ahead of the crews but I would have it wait in orbit until the explorers all arrive before landing. Multiple ships seperated by days or a week or two not years.
We would want to maximize the research from differing areas of Mars keep in mind that we should be able to traverse to the others landing sites with in hours as a means for help or assistance.
Here is another though due to the most recent device failure.
Well depending on If it is feasable to do, Bring up Hubble 2 and a deorbit booster stage in a shuttle and be done with the whole issue of repair. Send Hubble to it's demise or leave it for spare parts once the bosster is attached.
The reason for shuttles not being used is lack of Safe Haven. A myth that only will last for the duration of the supplies available for the crew to use. Now if the safe Haven has a spare return capsule then we have something to work from.
Yes, give the shuttle crew the needed time to repair if possible but always give second and third options for getting back safely.
On any rescue mission to save the crew and or a badly damaged shuttle that the current crew could not. The rescue team needs to have someone from Macco to teach them how to do hole repair.
A use cutting tools to remove tiles from around damaged area, lay in and weld new sheet metal to cover hole, cut tile peices to shape, apply adhesive, place tile into location, grind and smoothen tile to flush finish for under body repairs.
Yes, the RCC leading edge panels would be harder since each panel is not assimetrical from right wing location to left at the same point on the wing. Maybe half RCC panels or some other wrap over technique can be applied.
The whole problem of severe damage to the TPS system is not a small hole to be filled with a sealing patch but is one of space required for replacement pieces of tiles and of tools.
Your both talking eons down the road of not exploration but of settlement and until the numbers, race, and cultural difference either brought or developed there occur these things will most likely not come to pass. Unless some hardship or greed is introduced into the equation that would cause civilized people to act irrationally.
Here is a great image of the tracks made by the rovers on Mars.
I do love every bid of those awsome Rovers, more...
I guess the closer that it is to being more human in its abilities. Then the more likely it will be of value for just such repair operations. No space suit required. Otherwise it is just another one of a kind machine.
More news release stuff;
NASA's Solar Sail Propulsion Team and industry partners have successfully deployed two 10-meter solar sails in a vacuum environment — a critical milestone in development of the unique propulsion technology that could enable future deep space missions. Solar sail propulsion uses the Sun's energy to travel through space.
http://www.msfc.nasa.gov/news/news/rele … 4-208.html
Shelved instrument could restore Hubble's UV vision
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99996260
The good news is, An instrument that could replace key functions of a recently failed spectrograph on the Hubble Space Telescope is already built and sitting on the ground.
You might be able to find out the type of sail info on this site.
http://www.ugcs.caltech.edu/~diedrich/solarsails/
or on this one
http://www.solarsails.info/
Well depending on If it is feasible to do, Bring up Hubble 2 and a de orbit booster stage in a shuttle and be done with the whole issue of repair. Send Hubble to it's demise or leave it for spare parts once the booster is attached.
The cost of a Hubble robotic mission looks to be to high in cost and can only grow with the passing day that more devices become inoperative on Hubble.
Here is an article that details the cost of the Robotic mission.
http://www.centredaily.com/mld/centreda … 358626.htm
"The agency chief said the mission would cost roughly about $1 billion to $1.6 billion. But he warned that it was almost impossible to estimate the cost until a plan was developed."
I like the last one on the VSE will be fully funded. I would add that a CEV be designed post haste.
But the first one of Bush will win, by the narrowest of margines.
Some would say he stole this current term though hanging chads, turning away voters and by other means a steal to the right to be in office.
As to the other positions on war on any front here or abroad, I would hope that someday we will all learn how to live together in peace as Earthlings someday wanting to become Martians in the not to far off distant future.
Smile on my face....
There has also been several announcements of methane, ammonia and of other items that would tend to prove that a thin atmosphere is possible.
These are all great probes launched every two years to Mars but until we can get real funding for man to go it will only be just pictures to go ahhh, ouu and lots of other awe vocalizations.
The real pleasure is in being able to not only see it but to touch it as well.
So does anyone know why the Hubble's replacement, the James Webb Space Telescope, scheduled to be launched sometime in 2011 is taking some many years to develope?
I know that there is talk of Hubble 2 also in the works using existing upgrade resources intended for the Hubble but what would that time line for launch be?
The light may be green but the cash is in the red before we can even start?
Peter I need to borrow from you in order to pay pal just will not work when it comes to space.
So what effect will the most recent failure of xprize contestants have with the outcome of those that win?
from the astonotes:Aug. 9, 2004 Catch a falling rocket
complete with video and pictures of it
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3217961/
No matter what type of propellant or the design of the shape takes it still boils down to funding and of the complete rocket plus launch ect.. cost to operate it.
We must keep costs down in the design phase, construction and in its normal use or we will fail.
No matter what type of propellant or the design of the shape takes it still boils down to funding and of the complete rocket plus launch ect.. cost to operate it.
We must keep costs down in the design phase, construction and in its normal use or we will fail.
Cutting back on the ISS is being influenced by these as well as other problems in addition. For one getting the shuttle or some other vehicle designed and rated for manned use.
I knew I had seen another solar sail project called cosmos 1.
http://www.planetary.org/solarsail/index2.html
Even Nasa was into the game on solar sails.
http://solarsail.jpl.nasa.gov/
more history
http://www.space.com/busines....06.html
I did not however find proof of launch or of results with regards to cosmos 1. So they may indeed be the first to do so.
For reference what did the president want from his vision?
Well this is where we started in January of this year with articles of the vision leaked to the press.
Space Plan Envisions Apollo As Model Versatile Craft Is Key to Bush Program
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2....nd=true
Nasa returns to Apollo in quest for the perfect craft
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/interna....00.html
Whitehouse announcement
http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/space/
http://www.whitehouse.gov/space/toc.html
http://www.whitehouse.gov/space/renewed_spirit.html
http://www.projectconstellation.us/arti … o-cev.html
And many more links followed by the commission Hearing and there final report handed out after a slight delay in June.
http://www.projectconstellation.us/news … sions.html
Where are we now? Well after a little hedging on the direction of change, a little restructuring internally and a lot of haggling over the Budget not being passed by congress for the vision. We are still stuck in LEO with no way to get there and looks like Nasa is reverting back to its old self.
Where will we be in the near future? Well with continued under funding of Nasa projects, I forsee that more Items will be cancelled before they can be stated, Less will be done with the ISS and that we will be stuck in LEO for a lot longer than we all want to be after hearing the vision announcement earlier this year.
Hi GraemeSkinner,
Hubble has no ability to boost its orbit, that is why the Robotic mission is to attach a deorbit stage. Here is a couple of articles that detail the cost of the Robotic mission.
http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=200 … 5953-9102r
http://www.centredaily.com/mld/centreda … 358626.htm
"The agency chief said the mission would cost roughly about $1 billion to $1.6 billion. But he warned that it was almost impossible to estimate the cost until a plan was developed."
How about solar energy cost?
Every highway has section that could have over head collectors that track the sun. These if wide enough and properly spaced could also act as solar blinds to reduce car accidents on the east- west aligned roads. Store the energy during the day and use it during the night for highway lighting or for other reasons.