You are not logged in.
Trebuchet, Rxye, and the Cobraites looked on in satisfaction at the mass chaos and panic gripping the streets of the city as the dome was instantly plunged into darkness. Save for a few emergency lights and the steady background drone of the air cyclers, the electric grid was down Smoke billowed into the sky, along with a plume of steam and escaping water. Seeing all that precious water escape from the exploded geothermal plant brought a tear to Trebuchet's eye, but that might have just been the Martian dust that got in everything, too.
"Well, that's that. Time to grab a rover and head to Mount Olympus."
"Mount Olympus?" one of the Cobraites hissed. "We have searched the mountain for the Prophet Cobra and searched in vain. He is not on Olympus."
"Then you ain't searched good enough," Treubuchet said, ungrammatically angry. "He's bound to do something dramatic like hide under Olympus Mons... or he might have a secret base in the Mariner Valley, but trust me, the whole Olympus Mons thing is much more Cobra's style. He'll hear about this here disaster and come to investigate on account of the blown power grid."
"But elder Trebuchet, then why did you have us spraypaint 'Clark was here!' across the great monument to the first settlers, Cobra, and distilled liquors?" he asked, confused.
"Eh, dunno. Cobra never could pass up the chance to play 'abandon ship' with Clark. Hey Ryxe, you drive. We'll ride shotgun... and every other kind of gun."
Kerry spoke well about nothing, and Bush spoke poorly about substance. About even. Kerry did manage a few in-debate flipflops, like talking about Iraq being a mistake and then not a mistake, then later with the North Korea (bilateral or multilateral? How can you force me to choose!) He came off looking indecisive. Plus, there was the 'give nuclear fuel to Iran' thing, which was just... WTF.
On the other hand, Bush looked like his normal crappy public speaking self. He hit his points and occasionally tormented Kerry with past positions, but not often, and he mostly mailed in his performance. If Bush were a better public speaker, he'd have eviscerated Kerry, but he's a HORRIBLE public speaker.
So I call it an overall draw.
"Old geezers of Mars unite!" Trebuchet said, as the Belgian - the most famed connoisseur of beer on the planet - rose from his seat in the back. "We just need some dynamite and a rover or two."
"What would we need dynamite for?" one of the three Cobraites said, confused, as the rest of the bar's patrons fled from Ryxe's Exorcist impersonation.
"You said Cobra will come only in Mars's darkest hour, right? We'll blow up the geothermal plant... that'll get things rolling. Hell, Cobra might come out of hiding just for that - he always did hate to miss the party."
"You are wise," another Cobraite said. "I believe we can steal some explosives from the mines nearby. Many followers of the Great Prophet of Mars work there. They should help us."
"Then let's get going!" Trebuchet said, striding out of the bar easily in the low gravity.
Just look at the bright side of the technology: we no longer need to send adult farm animals to Mars. Just send cow embryos and BAM! Martian cowboys.
It was decades after the great Founding Period of Mars, and the ochre flag of the Republic of Mars flew over the historic TempleBar, where an aged Trebuchet served beer and groused about the degenerate nature of today's youth. "I remember the good old days, when men were men, rabbits were mutants, and Yu Knights were dead! What happened?" The assorted younger Martians at the bar, none of whom had made the long journey from the Old Planet themselves, simply stopped and stared at the old-timer. The silence of the bar was only broken by the rasping breath filters of pilgrims paying homage to the statue of Darth Cobra holding a shot of liquor and crushing a Yu Knight beneath his feet.
"Aww, things weren't like that back then, old timer," one of the young 'uns said. He looked barely old enough to shave, nevermind drink alcohol... though Mars didn't have a drinking age. "My parents were always on my case about how lazy I was, and how they walked five miles to get to from their hab to the airlocks in town."
"Your parents DID walk five miles to town, you young punk! I know they did because they knew they couldn't drive back!" The kids laughed, thinking he was just joking, but the angry Trebuchet slammed his fist down, making the whole bar shake.
"You think this is funny? This is your own history you're forgetting!"
"History?" One of the kids pointed a thumb in the direction of Darth Cobra. "It's just tall tales you originals tell everyone."
"How dare you blaspheme the Great Prophet!" one of the Cobraites hissed.
"He looks sort of like a Yu Knight..." one of the other Cobraites said, as everyone tensed for a fight.
"Now, none of that in the bar," Trebuchet said, having pulled a shotgun from beneath the counter. Everyone looked and sat down slowly. "It's no tall tales, now. I knew Cobra back in the day. He'd sit right over there," Trebuchet pointed to where the statue now stood, "and proclaim his message to the masses."
"Cobra is a myth!" one of the young Martians said.
"A myth! Why, I'll find him so you can say that to his face!" Slamming the shotgun back into its spot under the bar (and incidentally shooting out one end of it), the old man got out from behind the counter.
"You intend to find the prophet?" one of the Cobraites said.
"Damn straight," the elderly Trebuchet said.
"But he said he would only return in Mars's darkest hour!" one of the other followers said.
"Well then, I guess I just have to immanentize this eschaton, don't I?" he answered, with a clever look on his face. "Say, you boys mind lending a hand...?"
"Violence begets violence."
and so does nonviolence... humanity being the bastards that we are.
Iraq: part of "axis of evil", not developing WMDs, invaded.
North Korea: part of "axis of evil", has nukes, not invaded.
Iran: Part of axis of evil, does not have nukes, invadeable
Wanting nukes is not having nukes. North Korea is a special case because they already had a pseudo-nuclear threat in the ability to level Seoul with conventional artillery. This allowed them to bridge the gap between wanting and having.
Iran does not have that capability. Ergo, this is suicidal on the mullah's part. Not that that's unusual for Islamic fundies.
Hopefully the Iranians will back down. But are you sure they will?
If not, we need to take out those facilities.
But if we take out those facilities we also need to take out their air force and their missiles to prevent retaliation against US forces in Iraq and against Israel. General war with Iran via pre-emptive US/Israeli strikes.
As I said once before, these clowns couldn't beat Saddam. They have zero chance at even fighting to a draw against us.
Covert support of Iraqi Shia will become overt and if insurgents seize control of Basra, where do we draw our supplies from
The insurgents only have the ability to take what we're willing to let them take. Fallujah was taking a beatdown before someone (Cobra's 'weak Romans') decided it was better to not clear out the town, same with Sadr. They have the strength to push the troops out of places that we want to stay in only in their fevered imaginations.
It's an unreasonable gamble, since they know that Libya wasn't invaded and no noises about invading Libya are being made... look, this isn't difficult to understand: Iraq, crazy dictator, thought to be developing WMD, smashed. Libya, crazy dictator, ostentatious display of abandoning WMD, still in power. Very simple!
Basically, all this proves is that the mullahs are irrational. Which we already knew anyways, to be honest.
AnarCorp, building new worlds
:laugh: AnarCorp, the disorganization organization.
I like this vision of Mars; Utah crossed with Australia. It's also probably going to be true no matter what; the people most likely to want to move to another planet are going to be either desperate to escape Earth, fringy wild eyed dreamers, and religious/political splinter groups. One hell of a party, in other words. The resulting society would be... interesting. Certainly more original and fresh than the tired Earth.
No, from their perspective it means that the US might invade even if Iran is not developing WMDs, but that the US will not invade if they successfully develop nukes. They may see creating nukes as the only way to stop a US invasion.
This would be penny wise but pound foolish: while if you actually have nukes you might be safe, you first have to get nukes, which will guarantee US invasion.
It is much safer to follow the example of Libya.
My worry is what we do with the Islamicsts 30 years from now or 50 years from now if birth rates continue the direction they are heading.
One person, one vote is the American ideal.
I wonder how big an electoral vote prize China and India are...
...wait a minute, they're not US states! </sarcasm>
The fact that there is a population explosion somewhere else is no reason for fearfulness here. As far as immigrants go, you cut the numbers back to where you feel you can assimilate them; it's not like the Middle East is right over the border. No need to bring in Nazi references. They're free to screw up their own lands however badly they want, and their military strength is so pathetic that I'm unworried about them going on a spree of conquests in 30 to 50 years. By that time the US will probably be technologically advanced to the point where they might as well be fighting the Borg ("Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated. Your cultural distinctiveness will be obliterated by an endless sprawl of Wal-Marts and McDonalds...").
Ultimately, Islamic terror loses the War on Terror. The only question is how many people die in the process.
Edit: We have satellites. They have car bombs and a higher birth rate.
This seems more like a stunningly concise statement of the sheer scope of the failure to modernize that Iran has had. One nation has built satellites and advanced the sciences on every front, and the other is poor, overpopulated, and its best military weapon is cobbled-together makeshifts. One has women in its army, and the other has women in the 7th century.
How very frightening. Let's take them seriously!
But what if you believe the guy with the laser pointer is the psycho one?
Then I guess you mostly die, considering he's already got his gun trained on you.
Trebuchet suggests the mullahs lay low and avoid rocking the boat. How? they are already dead-center in our targeting radar. That little laser pointer light is already lighting up Tehran.
The only way to survive once the laser light pointer is shining on you is to do whatever it takes - and I mean whatever it takes, not halfassed stuff - to convince the US that you're not really as psycho and threatening as you seem. Because no matter how scary you are, the US is going to be a lot scarier in terms of knocking your ass down. They have stealth bombers with earth-penetrating bombs to kill your hardened nuclear sites, they're counting the zits on your forehead from orbit, they're listening in on all your phone calls. Realistically, it doesn't matter what you do; the US has proved in the case of Iraq that not only is it willing to beat the hell out of a nation it suspects of pursuing WMD, but that is is extrordinarily paranoid about WMD development and will think you're further along than you really are. That all adds up to the fact that pursuing nuclear weapons guarantees defeat, not safety, because the US will stop negotiating and start shooting when they think you're close. They will not wait until you have them in-hand.
Ghadaffi worked this all out a long time ago, hence, why Libya ostentatiously disarmed. He now has a relatively free hand in north Central Africa for his schemes, without having to worry about US Marines stopping by to chat. The mullahs have thus proven themselves more nutty than Whacky Ghaddafi. Interesting.
Note that North Korea is something of an exception to the rules here. But that is because the Norks have a pseudo-WMD in the sheer numbers of artillery aimed at Seoul, threatening hundreds of thousands of civilians with death. Absent this threat, Kim Il Jong would have been forcibly divested of his nuclear program.
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/internat … .html]Link
I imagine that if it turns out a stronger gravitational field is needed for early development of the embryo/fetus, that putting one of these in a centrifuge is a viable option.
Of course, this also opens up the freakishly Brave New World colonization scenario where you send a few adults and a shitload of frozen embryos and artificial wombs.
"I'm so glad to be a Beta..."
Brr. Though that might be the only reasonable way to colonize other star systems, in the long term.
Seriously, though, if you were a cleric in charge of Iran and wanted to stay that way, what would you do in the face of the United States' current posturing?
Pray for Kerry?
If I were an Iranian cleric, I wouldn't be so crazy as to put my nation in such dicey situations as "annoy the superpower". The United States is too busy playing Global Babysitter to the loud freaks to bother with a nation which isn't a major problem (Afghanistan, North Korea) or trying to look like a major problem (Saddam and his vaporware WMD program). Which means that you sit tight, oppress your people at home, and don't scream from the rooftops about your desire to use nukes once you have them, build your 'peaceful nuclear program' in widely scattered and fortified sites, and parade large missiles around. That looks only slightly suspicious, don't you think?
So assuming I am an Iranian mullah with a desire to keep a hold on my nation, I would not pursue nuclear weapons and be amazingly open about my lack of desire in WMD. I'd spend the cash on conventional weapons in case I need to beat the hell out of one of these obnoxious new democracies next to me. And I'd slip Lil' Kimmy cash from time to time to ensure that there is always someone higher in America's crosshairs.
If I were feeling particularly Machiavellian I might pull a Ghaddafi ("I am your BESTEST BUDDY! Look at the nuclear program I was putting together with help from my strongest neighbor Pakistan and that looney in North Korea! You really ought to do something about them.") then see if I could make my domestic opposition think the US sold them out. Put a split between the US and the domestic revolutionaries and most of my serious problems are over.
Quite right, MR!
But CC has quoted the popular understanding of how that situation came about, rather than the actual truth of the matter. While the reptiloids of Alpha Draconis were certainly involved, it wasn't in the way so many of us believe. No psychic motivator ray was ever used.
As revealed to me via telepathic transfer across interstellar space by the troglodytes of Beta Centauri 2, the Rothschilds actually were reptiloids from Alpha Draconis, bent on invading Earth by first weakening the world's economy.
Churchill was in fact killed in 1900 during the Boer War. His bodily appearance was assumed by an undercover agent of the amphibian cephalopods of Epsilon Eridani 3. The switch was barely noticed and no suspicions were aroused - except on those occasions when he would slump in a chair and begin to resemble a bullfrog.
Ha ha!
Martian Republic is out of his freakin' gourd. :laugh:
Then again, he doesn't realize that I'm your go-between with the Illuminati.
The issue I disagree most with in that article is actually the conclusion that the terrorists might 'win' the war on terror. A significant hardening of opinion is going on in the United States, and also to some degree in Europe, about the Middle East. This would be much more apparent if the invasion of Iraq hadn't occurred, which has largely obscured that shift of opinion. Just as the Middle East has had a swing towards thinking of the US as the big bad enemy, a similar shift has been underway in the United States, Europe, and Russia with every terrorist attack, suicide bomber, and beheading. Islam, as a whole, has a population less than four times that of the US alone, and the qualitative difference between the US and the Islamic world is such that the US would enjoy fairly huge odds in an all-out battle, and it is unlikely that the entire Islamic world would be involved as a monolithic whole. Right now, this is a comparatively nondeadly war. However, the mutual cycle of hate will cause things to escalate for a while, and eventually, the gloves will come completely off.
I fully expect that, before this thing is finally over, at least one Muslim country in the Middle East will be a shattered wreck, having been nuked to a fare-thee-well by somebody. My handicapping on 'somebody' runs Israel-US-Russia-Europe. I'd rather it didn't happen, but I don't think I'm going to get my wish. Decentralized fanatics can't help but keep expanding the number of enemies they have, and they will continue to cause greater and greater revulsion among those that they have with escalating attacks.
If you don't believe me that a fairly substantial number of people have been mentally preparing themselves for that, you should probably casually probe people on whether they think we'll end up nuking someplace over there if things keep going on like this. You'll be surprised. I know I was.
I opened this thread expecting to find some halfbaked, inane theory than blamed the US in a roundabout way, and got a pleasant surprise.
This actually is a large part of my thinking about why Al-Qaeda launched 9/11, and other terrorist attacks. Of course, it is not the only reason, because simply saying "They want to establish a unified 'Ummah (Islamic community)" doesn't address why they decided the best way of accomplishing this was by violently attacking a superpower in a manner which would enrage it to no end. Your link explains what they thought would happen, but not why, and it doesn't address the other factors.
The first thing to remember about our current enemies is that they're not strictly rational. While they plan things out logically enough, they, like some other movements in the past (fascism being an excellent example) have a worldview shaped by their will to believe in certain ideas. In this case, the central dogma that Al-Qaeda unquestioningly accepts includes a view of Islam as being the only pure and proper way, and any culture, nation, or system not based on Islam being decadent and seriously flawed and thus fragile (among other things). Absolutely fixed beliefs of this nature are incredibly dangerous to hold, because reasoning from this false premise leads you to incredibly stupid ideas, like killing thousands of people on network television by suicide attack in the biggest city of a superpower state. In their view, America is a weak, decadent country, distracted by comparatively scantily-clad women, alcohol, and scandal-mongering. Bush was not terribly wrong when he talked about the terrorists hating us because of our freedom. They viewed our freedom as license, which we freely indulged in; hence their contempt. Al-Qaeda expected us to cave like, well, France.
Another reason is also steeped in that unquestioning fanaticism. Al-Qaeda has something of a mystical bent to its pronouncements, and tends to pick 'historical' days to launch attacks when they can. To a degree, the concept of jihad has infused warfare with a magical element, and they view the act of violence as a transformative act, turning what would just be senseless carnage into a sort of perverse morality play, one where they live out a fantasy of being martyrs dying in the service of their god. The fact that this tactic may be suboptimal doesn't really impact them; this would conflict with the drama they have scripted for themselves.
The last reason is, well, sheer freakin' stupidity. No one (other than a large, nuclear power) seriously contemplates kicking the tiger in the butt like that. You simply have to be out of your gourd to provoke a nuclear power in that way, especially with the probability that the fourth plane was aimed at the White House or Congress. The United States did briefly consider, then dismissed, a nuclear strike against the Al-Qaeda camps out in the middle of nowhere.
(Actually, I've since come to the conclusion that such a course might have been wise. We would have:
A) Probably been able to use the temporary goodwill of the world to largely paper over the shock of using nuclear weapons. We could always claim, with a large measure of truth, that we were under extreme stress and confusion.
B) Osama would be unquestionably dead, having been vaporized.
C) Not even people in their wrong minds would seriously allow terrorists in their borders after that sort of spastic US response.)
The American Revolution was justified from the perspective that nothing else seemed to get through the thick skulls of the then leaders of Britain. If a sudden rush of brains had hit London during the period in question, things would be very different in the world.
Two possibilities emerge:
1) The colonies are granted some sort of 'home rule' as an extention of London's previous "benign neglect", and grow to resemble something like Anzacs on steroids internationally but virtually unchanged at home (save for aristocratic nobility nonsense). Such a semi-independent America would be a tremendous military boon to the British Empire, although it would probably greatly increase adventurism because London might get caught up in the occasional Western Hemisphere war. Forget the claims of 'yankee imperialism' now; a semi-independent US would probably devour the whole Carribean and Central America for King/Queen and Country.
2) The colonists are allowed to elect their own PMs. This would greatly change how the colonists develop, because London will have a very strong voice at first in their domestic policies, as New York would be as subject to Parliament in London as Birmingham. However, the sheer size of the US probably means it will surpass England proper eventually... possibly so gradually that it's almost unnoticed. Such a 'United Kingdom' would probably squash any chance of World Wars like ours from developing, because it would be such a hideously imbalancing nation. On the other hand, it would probably cause a lot of the anti-Americanism we see nowadays to be developed earlier and wear an Anti-British face, as the King of the Hill is always the biggest target.
Right now, I'm picturing TR leading the fight against the Boers. Hmmm....
What I would consider 'another Vietnam': Thousands of aging boomers having a flashback to their youth and annoying me ceaselessly with pointless slogans, mindless protests, and the general dung-tossing antics of the extreme leftist drugged by their own rhetoric.
In other words, I believe that this is 'another Vietnam', in the sense that I am severely annoyed by grandstanding leftists. Happily, their time has passed, and the war will be won.
If I were given the choice, I'd pull us out of the UN too. It's become nothing more than a International Procrastinators' Club. The only stuff I'd keep are things like UNICEF and WHO; the General Assembly and Security Council remind me more of a debate between sheep and wolves on what the dinner menu should be.
Because that would ADD complexity and weight?
Something that's always been a big troublesome area in exploring space is the suits - specifically, the joints are a pain in the rear. You need some sort of complex design to allow mobility, while still maintaining pressure.
Or do you?
I was thinking of those flexible drinking straws - you know, the ones with the concertina-like section that allow you to move it around. And I thought - why not?
Naturally, if you use the 'straw' approach straight, with no further work, you have problems: differential pressure will cause the concertina section to extend right out, leaving you right with the same problems as a suit without fancy joints.
But what if you simply prevented the concertina section from extending like that (via cord or a simple external metal 'joint')? The elbow section (or knee, or whatever) would have reasonably good mobility for a fairly simple to make suit.
If you divorce five wives who gets the house?
The lawyers.