New Mars Forums

Official discussion forum of The Mars Society and MarsNews.com

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Announcement: This forum is accepting new registrations by emailing newmarsmember * gmail.com become a registered member. Read the Recruiting expertise for NewMars Forum topic in Meta New Mars for other information for this process.

#1 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Project Orion » 2008-02-14 17:08:14

I was wondering if the Orion spacecraft can be a plausible transporation systems to Mars?

http://www.angelfire.com/stars2/projectorion/

I will definitely research this further.

Without question, many problems would have to be resolved before an ORION craft (nuclear propulsion via explosive nuclear devices) could be launched either from earth's surface or from orbit around earth. However, the technology is much further advanced than posts so far have reflected. The real problem is marshalling political will, not the technical side.

Actually building large numbers of nuclear devices suitable for use in ORION is not a critical issue. We already have tens of thousands of nuclear devices in the world's armories, so the expense of creating a new series of devices to launch ORION could be reduced markedly by recycling old weapons into new peaceful explosives. However, the cost of production for highly enriched fissile material is falling drastically, with new technology from improved centrifuges to atomic vapor enrichment using lasers. There will be plenty of relatively cheap fuel.

The expense or danger of testing new devices has been overstated. Today, accurate computer codes go a long way toward eliminating physical tests of the necessary devices before launch, and any such testing would be conducted in space or deep underground. This portion of the development program is unlikely to be significant. ORION's "fuel" will prove much cleaner than anyone so far has intimated.

Actual damage to the world's environment from launch of an ORION vehicle would be relatively slight. The actual damage done by all the world's atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons from 1945 to today has been negligible (discounting the actual use of nuclear weapons at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, at terrible cost). An ORION launch would be much cleaner than that historical program. Anti-nuclear nut cases have blown the possible environmental effects of all nuclear technology far out of proportion to actual experience.

Some form of nuclear propulsion is certain to prove a necessary component of our interplanetary program in the future. ORION offers the obvious advantage that we already know (essentially) how to do it.

I have no idea how we might contain or eliminate all the Luddites who would react to an ORION program with hysterical phobia. But we need not spend our time discussing the needs for mass public education and psychiatric aid to the distressed idiots who raise these false objections. Effort spent on further development of ORION at this stage yields valuable spin-off technology whether we ever build an ORION vehicle or not. Count on the technology to sell itself if the answers found by the scientists are sufficiently attractive.

#2 Re: Terraformation » Terraforming the Moon - Your opinion, please » 2008-01-01 18:55:48

Much discussion has already taken place on the problem of gas retention in an artificial lunar atmosphere. But has anyone else brought up the possibility of departing substantially from earth's atmosphere to develop a breathable mix from oxygen and noble gases?

Nitrogen has a molecular mass of approximately 28 AMU. Some of the work discussed earlier in this thread points out that an atmosphere of oxygen and nitrogen might last only a few hundred years. The noble gas Xenon has an atomic mass of 131. Mixtures of noble gases and oxygen are used in SCUBA equipment for deeper dives, where nitrogen gas can cause narcolepsy and the "bends".

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB