Otherwise, we wouldn't be seeing chemical attacks in Syria
Absolute twaddle. Assad isn't the only one in Syria with chemical weapons. Given how many weapons are schedule 3 (dual use technologies), it's pretty much impossible to prevent a group from getting hold of them. Since the attack in question apparently used chlorine, and the jihadis in question are on record as using that... but I suppose we can't trust outlets like the Voice of America and Russia Today, particularly when they're reporting the same thing. Back in April 2016. The rabbit hole goes deeper than we ever imagined...
]]>It's quite clear that Russia always intended to use chemical weapons, and intended its client states to use chemical weapons. Otherwise, we wouldn't be seeing chemical attacks in Syria, or that weird assassination attempt in the UK. You have to look at what they do, not listen to what they say. 90+% of what they say is lies and BS.
Longer-term, Russia may demand its modules back from the ISS, leading to its disassembly and destruction, and with little or no reentry control.
Geopolitics is a bitch, ain't it?
GW
]]>How long until the ISS is mutually destroyed as a means to sanction the other partner?
]]>