How China’s space station could help power astronauts to Mars
https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science … nauts-mars
European Space Agency plans to bring GPS and Skype to the moon with satellites
https://www.independent.co.uk/life-styl … 52946.html
LUNAR OUTPOST
https://fortmyers.floridaweekly.com/art … r-outpost/
Snag is NASA, ESA, Russia etc-- D'uh, we ALL believed NASA's forecasts for Shuttle costs & schedules. Big Expendable launchers had no place in the grand plan.
I've seen the arguments about Saturn5 being 'old tech'. but it worked *just fine*, would have done nicely to loft modules, capsules, even a lifting-body or two. Didn't happen. The Shuttle was expected to under-cut expendables' costs, turn-around in less time than it took to build and test an expendable...
The only realistic jobs for expendables beyond 'national pride' were polar orbit and other 'out of plane' paths. Even interplanetary probes would ride Shuttle to low-orbit, courtesy of 'Inertial Upper Stage'.
So, ESA put their money into building modules to suit a Shuttle lift. And, lo, NASA screwed up. And the ISS was scaled back, down-sized, down-sized twice more, deferred, delayed, crewed to a bare minimum. And, lo, NASA screwed up again.
( Analogy is building a range of custom cab-overs for the pick-up trucks you've seen in the new brochure, then learning the trucks will be a year late, twice the price and a five-star lemon with-all... )
Now, ESA, Japan, China, Russia, Brazil, SeaLaunch etc etc are re-learning the Saturn5 skills, building bigger and bigger expendable launchers.
Surprise, surprise, NASA's official shuttle-replacement Orion rides a Big Expendable launcher.
By the time Orion flies, three or four other groups will have similar lift capacity, several private 'reusable' launchers will be prototyped, and 'fly to orbit' tech may be pushing them hard...
Did you check the SABRE links ? That improbable heat-exchanger *works* and, IMHO, is as significant a development as 'Lancashire' tubed boilers...
]]>There would have been more, but NASA kept scaling back, delaying, re-designing etc. Losing a couple of shuttles didn't help...
FWIW, check out Alan Bond's SABRE engine...
http://www.aau.ac.uk/rel.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SABRE
http://www.reactionengines.co.uk/index.html
Look under current projects...
When we got something setup on the Moon the possibility will come for something stationed at L5 and L4...I'd even encourage it. However until scramjet and/or space elevator technology matures enough don't hold your breath.
]]>We could even build wondrous space stations at L4 & L5 using material rail-gunned from Moon !! Perhaps even a Bernal Sphere or two !!
Unfortunately, we're still at the 'Coracles, Sewn-Plank & Clinker-Built' stage of space-ship building. Alas & Alack, the 'Great Endeavour' is currently careened whilst that sprung plank is laboriously repaired...
FWIW, I've been in British Interplanetary Society long enough to want to weep over NASA's decades of bumbling...
]]>